Wij
I am a FH squatter
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2003
- Messages
- 18,404
They lost when one side broke the law repeatedly and had the advantage of being able to lie through their teeth about what leaving the EU could be like.
Stupid idea to have a referendum in the first place. Ruling party is happy with the status quo but offers to have a referendum on it anyway?!? Cameron should just have told his lunatic wing to shut up or fuck off. UKIP were never going to win seats in a general election anyway.
To be fair to Banks, his banter is several levels above any of the dreary Remoaners always in the news.
View: https://twitter.com/Arron_banks/status/1058005163301056512?s=19
Anyway smells like a political witch hunt to me, and I suspect a couple of the fabled EU brown envelopes have changed hands, but let's see where it goes eh?
Vote Leave and Leave.EU have both been found to have broken the law by the electoral commission. Where did the Remain campaign break the law? Which body has reached this verdict?The fact that we voted out shows the referendum had to be had in the first place - Major not giving us a vote on Maastricht was a massive miscalculation.
However both sides have been proven to break the law (even if Vote Leaves was an admin error made on the advice of the Electoral Commission), and much rubbish was talked on both sides. However the leaflet mentioned by Job said the Government would implement the result, so let's get on with it shall we?
Everyone breaks the electioneering 'laws', Obamas team did it to the tune of 400K.
I dont know the process, but its a pointless investigation unless its utterly outrageous, what they gonna do rerun the referendum..or Obamas and Trumps vote?
Not even similar.Everyone breaks the electioneering 'laws', Obamas team did it to the tune of 400K.
I dont know the process, but its a pointless investigation unless its utterly outrageous, what they gonna do rerun the referendum..or Obamas and Trumps vote?
And the Russians buying referendums to suit their political agenda isn't utterly outrageous?
It's evident that anti-EU sentiment wasn't around 10 years ago, the economic crash and a need for a scape goat brought it about, and somehow the popularity of Brexit boomed when there was a bunch of charismatic politicians spouting lots of lies whilst there was a muted defence from a bunch of wet flannels.
As for the US, 400k 'overspending' is probably an financial oversight/risk more than anything, considering it's peanuts in the sea of cash that the Americans use.
I regardless of the outcome of these investigations, both Remain and Leave should be looking into this, unless we're putting Brexit above our security?
ECHR is not an EU institution.Anti EU sentiment started with the European court, then mass immigration from NA and ME into the free movement zone, then pretty well hit the stratosphere when they sent Cameron home with 5% off tampons.
The working classes lost most of the people in the war and seeing a German chancellor pretty well running the club, would account for 50% of the leave votes.
Anti EU sentiment started with the European court, then mass immigration from NA and ME into the free movement zone, then pretty well hit the stratosphere when they sent Cameron home with 5% off tampons.
The working classes lost most of the people in the war and seeing a German chancellor pretty well running the club, would account for 50% of the leave votes.
I can't be arsed to look it up but I'm sure you've been pulled up before for saying that we're "leaving Europe".Well remoaners treat Europe and the EU as the same thing when it suits them.
And there we go again...I like it how you say you're not xenophobic, but the only two reasons you listed for Brexit are;
A. Muslim migration (which we will see more post brexit)
B. Being 'led by a German because WW2'
This is why everyone laughs at you and you have no credibility, you're making dangerous choices based on where people are from in the world.
Anti EU sentiment started with the European court, then mass immigration from NA and ME into the free movement zone, then pretty well hit the stratosphere when they sent Cameron home with 5% off tampons.
The working classes lost most of the people in the war and seeing a German chancellor pretty well running the club, would account for 50% of the leave votes.
Retarded arseholes in Grimsby.
Just feeding the stereotype eh.
Northern towns full of cretins who need saving by immigrants.
Northern England built the wealth of the empire, now its all in London..the great service industry and casino of Europe.
I dont think you can blame tories for the Norths decline
The very description if the self hating remainer, the guard , seriously Im starting to think its a Russian bot.
British icons to throw off the white cliffs: what’s on your list? | Ian Jack
Retarded arseholes in Grimsby.
Just feeding the stereotype eh.
Northern towns full of cretins who need saving by immigrants.
Northern England built the wealth of the empire, now its all in London..the great service industry and casino of Europe.
As I said, just a new world order, we cant compete on large scale manufacturing so have moved to the service sector which is based in London mostly.He's right though, we need to progress, not look in the past for our guidance for the future, which we always do.
Which you want to do.
So @Job if you don't blame the Tories for the decline of the North, who do you blame? Migrants?
Its not a dead town though is it, it can be turned around, I'm just not sure that turning it into bombay by the sea is required.I came from that northern town full of cretins, and they don’t need saving by immigrants they need to fuck off out of their dead towns and find a job. Just because a stereotype exists doesn’t mean it’s wrong. I have a million times more respect for an immigrant than I do for any of that lot. At least they’re trying to make a better life for themselves.