Wrong... My world is better for you being in it @Trem
Not in this house either!Please get a room ffs.
Last time you said that you wanted in on the daisy chainPlease get a room ffs.
Source?Back to Clarkson, looks like they are bringing an old school chum producer to keep a check on him...which basically means he is back.
Source?
Based on the fanbase it's more of a cry-engine.
Source?Looks like the BBC have jumped off a cliff and are going to sack him, it was nice while it lasted BBC, what a sad end for the greatest TV corporation on the planet.
Seriously, they are talking about continuing it without him.
Looks like the BBC have jumped off a cliff and are going to sack him
The punching thing was said originally but there have been just as many stories saying there wasn't punching.If he's assaulted someone he *has* to be sacked.
Presuming that's the case then BBC is stuck in a lose-lose here - either sack someone who's assaulted another staff member and be condemned by a million idiot fanb0is (and lose 50m cash for the "pleasure" of doing so), or don't sack someone guilty of assault.
I don't care what walk of life you come from or how much you're worth - if you punch someone at work then you get punted out of the door.
I'm gutted 'cause I really enjoy Top Gear - but if it happens then it's nobodies fault but Clarkson's.
That's why my first sentence started with "if" and my second sentence "presuming".The punching thing was said originally but there have been just as many stories saying there wasn't punching.
I think if any famous person allegedly punched someone else at work then the media would follow it.Just getting a little tired of all these media generated witch hunts that are created just to fill news time.
I think if any famous person allegedly punched someone else at work then the media would follow it.
It's overblown, yes, but not a witch hunt. A witch hunt is the unjust victimisation of someone/a group of people for differing views (like the persecution of communists in 1950's America).
Clarkson's being hounded because he was involved in a bust up of some kind. Not because he represents an imaginary threat to society.
Assuming it was an actual physical assault, then no I don't think the incident in isolation should go either way - assault should be a sacking, period.Hmm, not so sure. This incident in isolation could have gone either way if it hadn't been for all the other media-generated faux outrage that had come before; most of the earlier stuff really was a witch-hunt.