News War with Russia

BloodOmen

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
18,132
USA reckons Putin's inner circle is starting to show major cracks. He's being confronted on a daily basis by his closest inner allies now over the war.

Only a matter of time before him or them fall out of windows mysteriously I reckon.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
36,725
A full on conventional conflict with NATO would see Russia destroyed in a matter of days.
Yep, if you discount the fact that they're a nuclear state so there's zero - literally zero - point in ever thinking in those terms again.

A lot of the current situation is predicated by decisions taken by the US at the end of the second world war, as Albert wrote...


Everything about this is just such a massive pile of lose-lose-lose :(
 

dysfunction

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,709
Yep, if you discount the fact that they're a nuclear state so there's zero - literally zero - point in ever thinking in those terms again.

A lot of the current situation is predicated by decisions taken by the US at the end of the second world war, as Albert wrote...


Everything about this is just such a massive pile of lose-lose-lose :(

My thinking is that the rest of the Russian government is a lot more sensible and would not start a nuclear war. I don't think anyone has an appetite for that.

But then nothing is certain so obviously everyone has to be cautious.

I'm counting on when things go from bad to worse for Russia Putin will be removed or assassinated
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
36,725
My thinking is that the rest of the Russian government is a lot more sensible and would not start a nuclear war. I don't think anyone has an appetite for that.
Whilst my hopes and aspirations lie along the same lines as you, hundreds of thousands of years of human history shows we're all as bad as each other.
 

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,834
My thinking is that the rest of the Russian government is a lot more sensible and would not start a nuclear war. I don't think anyone has an appetite for that.

But then nothing is certain so obviously everyone has to be cautious.

I'm counting on when things go from bad to worse for Russia Putin will be removed or assassinated

I wouldn't be so sure, Putin is all about the money and power, he literally cannot take criticism, or guidance (see his laughable, embarrassing war), the rest of them are still stuck in the USSR, with some weird idea that Russia is some sort of global power. Someone will put a bullet in the back of his head, but it won't stop the war. The danger is a real imperialist (any other Russian) will take charge and still think it's the 1880s, funnily enough, about the age of their military doctrine, but with more embezzlement.
 
Last edited:

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
19,917
My thinking is that the rest of the Russian government is a lot more sensible and would not start a nuclear war. I don't think anyone has an appetite for that.

But then nothing is certain so obviously everyone has to be cautious.

I'm counting on when things go from bad to worse for Russia Putin will be removed or assassinated

I don't think this is likely, there needs to be like an *immediate* revolution from within the military so that Putin can't suddenly let off nukes as a last ditch resort.

I think Gaffer posted it, but I think he will detonate a nuke in the black sea, and see what NATO does in response, then move onto military targets and then civilian targets, and it'd only be a matter of time before we respond.

I think the hope is in Russia's nukes being old and shit & NATO/US having intel on their locations and able to pre-emptively stop them some how.
 

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,834
I don't think this is likely, there needs to be like an *immediate* revolution from within the military so that Putin can't suddenly let off nukes as a last ditch resort.

I think Gaffer posted it, but I think he will detonate a nuke in the black sea, and see what NATO does in response, then move onto military targets and then civilian targets, and it'd only be a matter of time before we respond.

I think the hope is in Russia's nukes being old and shit & NATO/US having intel on their locations and able to pre-emptively stop them some how.

Russian nukes aren't old and shit. It's probably the only thing that is ring-fenced from Russian corruption. If Russia is to launch a nuke, it won't be into the black sea. I know, launching a nuke is basically the last straw, but it won't be anywhere near a (despite recent dickory) ally (Turkey) Maaaybe in the Sea of Azov, if they lose Crimea. But anything else is a "right fuck it, we all die" moment.

Edit, realistically, we are looking at Ukraine taking back territory up to the Dnieper (including Kherson) and then stalemate until spring, then it's a whole fresh board.
 
Last edited:

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,834
Too late for edit, I reckon the Ukrainians will clear the Russians out up to the Dnieper until winter, hold the line and then pummel Crimea, first the bridge from mainland Russia will be HIMAR'd then they will just ravage it. The Russian Black Sea fleet has already retreated (into the Sea of Azov) it is indefensible.

I should add, that all this delay will increase civil unrest in Russia and resistance in their client states.
 
Last edited:

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,834
Also, fuck China, the arse is about to fall out of their entire economy. You can only mortgage so many unbuilt flats until something goes wrong, they are balls deep into nothing. Civil unrest is building.

India...lol, what. who cares.

Iran, about to hit revolution.

(all of) Africa, who fucking cares, they can pin their flags all they like, they need to pick the winning side or fuck off, they really have no horse in the race, despite playing "Neutral" they need to be very careful here. Russian has no international aid program.

Russia has no friends.
 
Last edited:

caLLous

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
18,520
It's not looking clever... the road bridge is now totally unpassable (most of a bit of it is in the water) and the rail bridge is surely damaged beyond repair by the fire if it doesn't outright collapse as well.





 
Last edited:

Embattle

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
13,505
The road bridge part wouldn't be too hard to fix as it is more the approach causeway to the main bridge, which is a more valuable target.
 

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,834
Some of the memes... complete humiliation for Russia.
 

Ormorof

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,887
Christ that video is a real Hollywood style explosion, guess all that fuel makes it look extra dramatic
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
19,917
I'm not sure it's a strategic good move though - it'll just make Russia ramp up the defence for the bridge with the navy which really isn't doing much ATM.

Unless Ukraine are conducting unprecedented offensives right now, of course.
 

Zarjazz

Identifies as a horologist.
Joined
Dec 11, 2003
Messages
2,417
I'm not sure it's a strategic good move though - it'll just make Russia ramp up the defence for the bridge with the navy which really isn't doing much ATM.

Unless Ukraine are conducting unprecedented offensives right now, of course.

So destroying the only land bridge between Russia and Crimea isn't a good strategic move during a time of war? I think I need a new dictionary because obviously mine is telling lies.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
19,917
So destroying the only land bridge between Russia and Crimea isn't a good strategic move during a time of war? I think I need a new dictionary because obviously mine is telling lies.

Kinda depends what the Russian response is - as I say, if they beef up defences and get it repaired pretty quickly, it would also boost Russian morale.

Your dictionary should probably point out that destroying bridges in combat zones is effective, but not away where it can be quickly repaired.
 

SilverHood

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
2,302
If they have to beef up defenses, that's resources and war material not used elsewhere. It ties it them up nicely, far enough away from front line that they're not a threat, close enough to strike if they get complacent.

For a modern country, rebuilding a bridge like that shouldn't pose much of a problem. But a sanctioned one like Russia? Where are they going to get engineers to assess the damage, architects to come up with a rebuilding plan? Skilled construction workers to do the rebuilding? Materiel, tools and equipment? Anyone involved knows they'll have a target on their heads during their time there. Plus, any funds allocated to rebuilding will evaporate into the Russian corruption sponge.
 

Embattle

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
13,505
They already made massive claims of a 10 point defense around the bridge before this attack, didn't exactly mean much it seems.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
19,917
They already made massive claims of a 10 point defense around the bridge before this attack, didn't exactly mean much it seems.

How do you know it's the first attempt by Ukraine? could have been the 1st, 10th or 100th or 1000th.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
36,725
It was a good move by Ukraine, a morale coup and effectively cuts off an important supply line (for a short period of time - Russia will have army engineers and bridge repairs for logistics isn't that hard to do).

Definite win though.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom