ECA
I am a FH squatter
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2003
- Messages
- 9,466
Ok let's do some deconstruction.
Aph3x claims ch3tan is correct and I'm the head vampire: Why is he voting for the leader of his own faction to get lynched?
Aph3x is a confirmed vampire yet somehow he is following ch3tans version that I'm the head vampire? ( he might say he isnt following ch3tans version BUT in his vote post for me he quotes ch3tans mass quotage.... so he really is ).
Aph3x only informed us he roleblocked ch3tan after ch3tan asked him who he roleblocked on night 1.
Yet Ch3tan hasn't pointed out how terrible this logic is - which is damn obvious and too obvious for ch3t to not see.
In addition - As stated several times - if there are three vampires and 5 non-vampires the only way we can win is if we lynch a vampire tonight
- would Aph3x really vote for another vampire, when he knows he is likely to die overnight ( if Fl3a wants the village to win rather than the vampires , or we have a vigilante ).
If the vampires can sucker people into following bad logic and you lynch me today then the village loses.
------
Now lets say ch3tan claims I could be a wolf.
Well the result is the same as lynching fl3a.
The vampires get another convert tonight and have 4 vampires in a village of 7.
Even if fl3a kills a vampire, and the vampires kill flea they would then have 2 vampires in a village of 5, needing only one misvote by a villager to win them the game.
Simply put - if ch3tan were a villager he would be advocating lynching Aph3x as it's a positive result for the village and increases our chances compared to
A: Voting fl3a and causing a vampire win if successful.
B: Claim I am a wolf and thus cause the village to lose if they lynched me and giving the vampires a win.
C: Falsely lynching a villager trying to help the village and killing me which lets the vampires get a majority thus winning the game.
Ch3t isnt going with any of the logical options if he were a villager, and hasnt challenged Aph3xs logic - and it is too late to try and clear his name by doing it now.
The only exception to this would be if ch3tan were a wolf, but then if that were the case fl3a wouldn't have taken a counterstance he could have just added on me and it would be 4 votes on me just needing one more to carry the day and give the wolves some shot of success with ch3tan as the lonewolf.
----------------------------
Anyway long multiquotes and stuff like this is only going to confuse those with less time and make them more prone to making a bad decision.
I've said everything that can be said and explained why with imo good logic.
I will make any future posts to this as short as possible to prevent the thread becoming unreadable and obfuscated.
My only question now is Thadius... is he a vampire, or an idiot? If the vamps have three, he's probably a vampire, which means Olgaline, Vasc and Uara are innocent ( or have a wolf among them ), If there are only two vampires then he could just be an idiot.
Aph3x claims ch3tan is correct and I'm the head vampire: Why is he voting for the leader of his own faction to get lynched?
Aph3x is a confirmed vampire yet somehow he is following ch3tans version that I'm the head vampire? ( he might say he isnt following ch3tans version BUT in his vote post for me he quotes ch3tans mass quotage.... so he really is ).
Aph3x only informed us he roleblocked ch3tan after ch3tan asked him who he roleblocked on night 1.
Yet Ch3tan hasn't pointed out how terrible this logic is - which is damn obvious and too obvious for ch3t to not see.
In addition - As stated several times - if there are three vampires and 5 non-vampires the only way we can win is if we lynch a vampire tonight
- would Aph3x really vote for another vampire, when he knows he is likely to die overnight ( if Fl3a wants the village to win rather than the vampires , or we have a vigilante ).
If the vampires can sucker people into following bad logic and you lynch me today then the village loses.
------
Now lets say ch3tan claims I could be a wolf.
Well the result is the same as lynching fl3a.
The vampires get another convert tonight and have 4 vampires in a village of 7.
Even if fl3a kills a vampire, and the vampires kill flea they would then have 2 vampires in a village of 5, needing only one misvote by a villager to win them the game.
Simply put - if ch3tan were a villager he would be advocating lynching Aph3x as it's a positive result for the village and increases our chances compared to
A: Voting fl3a and causing a vampire win if successful.
B: Claim I am a wolf and thus cause the village to lose if they lynched me and giving the vampires a win.
C: Falsely lynching a villager trying to help the village and killing me which lets the vampires get a majority thus winning the game.
Ch3t isnt going with any of the logical options if he were a villager, and hasnt challenged Aph3xs logic - and it is too late to try and clear his name by doing it now.
The only exception to this would be if ch3tan were a wolf, but then if that were the case fl3a wouldn't have taken a counterstance he could have just added on me and it would be 4 votes on me just needing one more to carry the day and give the wolves some shot of success with ch3tan as the lonewolf.
----------------------------
Anyway long multiquotes and stuff like this is only going to confuse those with less time and make them more prone to making a bad decision.
I've said everything that can be said and explained why with imo good logic.
I will make any future posts to this as short as possible to prevent the thread becoming unreadable and obfuscated.
My only question now is Thadius... is he a vampire, or an idiot? If the vamps have three, he's probably a vampire, which means Olgaline, Vasc and Uara are innocent ( or have a wolf among them ), If there are only two vampires then he could just be an idiot.
