censi said:Compared to Infs and even nightshades, shadowblades are completly outperformed.
The question is should infs and nightshades (to a lesser extent) be aligned (NB'd) or should shadowblades get some love?
:eek2:Tualatin said:Prefer NS.. cuz they are the real OP
Tualatin said:Sb's can still hit damn hard =P
I don't know what point u mean exactly, but if any.. no more love.. just a nerf for infil / ns. Prefer NS.. cuz they are the real OP
waok`whips said:SB's are below par when they solo, which they often don't so therefore grounds for giving them love isnt warrented in this case.
waok`whips said:SB's are below par when they solo, which they often don't so therefore grounds for giving them love isnt warrented in this case.
waok`whips said:SB's are below par when they solo, which they often don't so therefore grounds for giving them love isnt warrented in this case.
Aussie said:it's not the class which is crap, it's the players.
Raven said:i actually think SBs are about right but infils and shades are a bit to much, there is no way an assasin should be able to beat a heavy tank, saying that though in my experiance the only reason assasins can beat heavy tanks is debuffs.
lathoniel said:1800hp, con debuff = 1500hp, malice debuff = 1200hp, malice /use2 = fuk me 900hp, good viper poison for -500hp = 400hp. sb dont need loving. they need to ask paradox and samal how to play ffs.
Trylle^nzi said:Said the scout with zephyr, best bow damage/range, slam and possibility to spec IP.
[HB]Jpeg said:agreed . i dont consider myself to be a bad player at all. i have a fuly toa'd sc'd rr5+ friar and i get beat 1v1 v sb's quiet often.