That would be hilarious, Unlucky Salmond, but we're off, now you have to carry Northern Ireland and Wales, good luckI want an English referendum now.
I am curious what happens to the SNP now since it's almost like the entire reason their party existed is now void.
But they discounted another vote for a generation. So they become irrelevant till thenNot really Scotland still isn't independent so their goal continues, if Scotland did become independent then they might have to reassess their stated goals
Anyone fancy making a tl;dr version of this thread? I cba to read it all and I'm not interested in the topic in all honesty, but it's just about the only active thread on the forum these days.
Now that this is over.
Isn't a 50% target a really bad idea? Winning by one vote would mean that 1.8 Million people live under a rule they didn't want, and 1.8 dont?
Surly it should have been set at 60 or 70% ?
I'm still amazed by the turnout - when was a 75% turnout (Glasgow) last considered to be low? Normal service will undoubtedly be resumed in May, when the only question in (far too) many areas of Scotland is the size of the labour majority.
I've always felt like this about it, simply because if Yes got 51% of the vote, that would still be under half of the total people eligible to vote. Although Yes got 45% of the vote, it was only ~37% of the actual registered voters.
Interesting, at a glance map of where voted how and by how much...
Why did the ones near the border vote so strongly in the No? Simply because they feel more united because they're closer to the rest of the UK?I think that can be summed up as:
- Yes voters are in areas with most poverty.
- The more well off areas were No.
In general:
- Look at the striking difference between East Renfrewshire (7) and Glasgow City (8). East Renfrewshire is a) a Scottish Tory heartland b) mahoosive houses c) rich Jews.
- In addition, the commuters that earn all the money in Glasgow live outside the city centre in (7) and (3).
- Land owners and farmers close to England rejected a Yes vote.
- Orkney and Sheltand don't like Salmond or the SNP. They're sitting on a shitload of untapped black gold, and they don't want that fat pie taking their oil revenues and spending it on lazy bastards in Glasgow.
- Edinburgh was a strong No, to be expected since it's the financial capital (see above about wealth and No).
- Aberdeen also a strong No for the same reasons.
Interesting, at a glance map of where voted how and by how much...
Salmond throws hands in air and storms off.....or knowing that hes done his thing hes no longer effective.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-29277527
Why did the ones near the border vote so strongly in the No? Simply because they feel more united because they're closer to the rest of the UK?
The only minor downside to this being his current deputy is possibly the only Scottish politician even more annoying than he is.Alex Salmond has resigned!
The only minor downside to this being his current deputy is possibly the only Scottish politician even more annoying than he is.
If the SNP decide to have her take over the leadership they'll be in real trouble.