N
Novamir
Guest
- Thread starter
- #31
lol Karam
how me where you outdamaged me? you hit for less than a normal mage DD ! Your damage aint scary, and it's less than mine !
secondly, you have proved yourself without understanding of the way the game works. a firby with max spec spear, or a troll with max spec hammer will both have higher DPs per swing than you, because of their lower QUI. if you both used the same weapons they will do more damage per swing.
I find it quite funny that a polearms dude has to train polarms to full, AND another whole damage line to full in order to get the same as just one spec line for us.
max damage on firby spear hero (~650 dps cap) = 50 spear needed.
max damage on highlander polarms (~650 dps cap) = 50 polearms + 50 dmgtype
can you see the problem there ^_^
this allows heros to have 42 shield for slam, 45+ spec in either LW or spear, some minimal 1H weapon spec to get taunt, and 40+ parry. Instead poor mister ub3r armsman d3wd has to max out two spec lines where we have only one. I've yet to see a polearms with slam, which I believe is the only reason for having shield. I can't imagine RvR without slam O_O
about my specific damage, I have effectively gimped myself ;/ I didn't decide to go with a 2H weapon until level 43, so, my actual spec is 41 Blades, 43 shield, 39 spear, 27 parry. If we ever get a fookin respec I will lower blades to 39 and maybe change it to blunt, lower shield to 42, and put those spec points into spear to do some better damage. so matinex, cadwyr, other celts using spear will outdamage me because i dont have a good spec.
and btw don't flatter yourself, you're not annoying me, I enjoy showing you how you are wrong too much ;D
how me where you outdamaged me? you hit for less than a normal mage DD ! Your damage aint scary, and it's less than mine !
secondly, you have proved yourself without understanding of the way the game works. a firby with max spec spear, or a troll with max spec hammer will both have higher DPs per swing than you, because of their lower QUI. if you both used the same weapons they will do more damage per swing.
I find it quite funny that a polearms dude has to train polarms to full, AND another whole damage line to full in order to get the same as just one spec line for us.
max damage on firby spear hero (~650 dps cap) = 50 spear needed.
max damage on highlander polarms (~650 dps cap) = 50 polearms + 50 dmgtype
can you see the problem there ^_^
this allows heros to have 42 shield for slam, 45+ spec in either LW or spear, some minimal 1H weapon spec to get taunt, and 40+ parry. Instead poor mister ub3r armsman d3wd has to max out two spec lines where we have only one. I've yet to see a polearms with slam, which I believe is the only reason for having shield. I can't imagine RvR without slam O_O
about my specific damage, I have effectively gimped myself ;/ I didn't decide to go with a 2H weapon until level 43, so, my actual spec is 41 Blades, 43 shield, 39 spear, 27 parry. If we ever get a fookin respec I will lower blades to 39 and maybe change it to blunt, lower shield to 42, and put those spec points into spear to do some better damage. so matinex, cadwyr, other celts using spear will outdamage me because i dont have a good spec.
and btw don't flatter yourself, you're not annoying me, I enjoy showing you how you are wrong too much ;D