Tom
I am a FH squatter
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 17,355
Where do you stand on boffins designing expensive bits of kit that let cyclists / rowers / swimmers go faster? Not exactly a level playing field if one country uses space-age super-bikes or symbiotic dolphin-skin swimsuits that cost £1million to develop and another gets their gear from Decathlon.
The gains are marginal. You could have a bike with an aero package that allows you to maintain a certain speed using a fraction of a watt less, but that has to be tested in a wind tunnel. So you ban aero bikes and wind tunnels, and a team simply moves their testing into a velodrome and uses averages to decide which bike is better. You can't ban that kind of testing since speed and time are integral to the sport. A lot of gains are made from rider position, training schedules, etc. It all comes down to money - find the most promising athletes, pay them a wage and train them to be the best they can. All you can do to level the playing field is insist that no performance enhancing drugs are used and the equipment conforms to minimum standards. The Olympic ideal is to be the best you can possibly be, so you can't place any constraints on personal training.
At the end of the day, money is very important. And it isn't a waste either, since these gains filter down to anyone interested in sport.