- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 36,690
1) Posting the Fail on here used to be a hangable offence. But not when it comes to this sort of shit I see. You've both given Job an out for his idiocy. If there are multiple sources then why the hell not post *anything* other than the fail?A two second google shows that story is on multiple sites, of all political persuasions. And you're being a bit of a tool; the two issues are related
2) They don't *have* to be. I've been pretty fucking clear where I lie on surgical intervention, on multiple occasions. How many times should I post that when @Wij keeps on posting the same thing? His argument clearly changed yesterday, so I'd say Wij is being the tool - because, as I went to great pains to point out - I've addressed the surgical intervention thing loads so lets have a talk about where we disagree?
I'm bored of the surgery angle. Separate them out. Wij is going to great lengths to avoid that, because if you separate them out, and it works how I described yesterday, then there's nothing to see here.
Well done. I don't think anyone, at all, has argued against this. Even once.This. There is a long and ignominious history of medics exercising pet theories as fact. As I've said on this thread before, some of the worst have been the advocacy of surgical interventions for psychological issues. Its never gone well.
The only reason it's the focus of the argument is because if you separate this out then there's no fucking problem for people to get their knickers in a twist with, is there?
But, you know, parental terror and suddenly the Daily Mail is an acceptable news source around here...
Last edited: