Bodhi
Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 9,346
...so...anyway...
Oscars board expels Harvey Weinstein
That's him done for in the films and shizzle.
Yet Roman Polanski is still a member.
...so...anyway...
Oscars board expels Harvey Weinstein
That's him done for in the films and shizzle.
Just checking.
Are we boycotting all films he has been involved in?
Jesus fuck..Weindtein is one fucked up individual, using your position and power to seduce women is one thing, this guy raped women who were too scared to report it because it would ruin their careers and define them as victims.
The fucket should be shot.
Great news if you want to buy someone the House of Cards DVD box set for Xmas.
It's only come out because of the Weinstein stuff. There have been rumours flying around about Spacey for years but his response to this is pretty pathetic (and a transparent attempt at deflection by coming out for the first time in the second paragraph). "Sorry if I tried to rape you but I'm gay now, isn't that cool?"
The problem with allegations in public is that they require a public response, regardless of their veracity.I also have a bit of a problem with him saying, "I don't remember that happening but sorry anyway"
Like sorry is just a response that makes it all better...if it did indeed happen, could be a chancer for all we know, making sorry even emptier.
I can't see a solution tbh.
So, he's scum. She settled, which is a shame, probably because of the fact that she thought there'd be no legal redress. Totally OK with this.The actor allegedly had previously signed a $100,000 settlement with Weinstein in 1997 over the incident, but says that she discovered this summer that the agreement did not include a confidentiality clause
So, there's been an initial approach by someone (my only thought was that McGowan found it out and went - your contract was shit - give me more money) - and an offer of $1m was made - probably stipulating a redo the original contract with a confidentiality clause.The actor says that she initially responded to Weinstein’s offer with her own counter-offer of $6m, partly as a way of raising money towards paying for her career as a multimedia artist and partly as a means of torturing the producer. However, one day after the New York Times published an explosive investigation detailing decades of alleged abuse by Weinstein, she decided to reject the offer outright. “I was like – ew, gross, you’re disgusting, I don’t want your money, that would make me feel disgusting,” she said.
Seems Corey Feldman is going to out the pedo ring in Hollywood - inb4 he's found dead, that's a lot of powerful people that will likely want him to remain quiet.
I was with him until he started asking for cash at 5 min. If he has this info just make it public, don't beg for cash to relaunch a flagging career ffs.
Right, so everyone has basically presumed his guilt because a guy said it happened all those years, despite there being zero evidence, zero witnesses, no trial and the alleged perp saying that he didn't remember it happening. It's starting to get very murky indeed. Guilt presumed.
Ok, next question then. If it was such an open secret in the industry, why the fuck give such a cunt a special emmy.