really bad wording there - i hope you mean that you have no qualms with voting against aph3x, rather than 'even though i dont think hes a bad guy im voting against him to save my own skin'
Rly. Discuss about what? About ppl posting more often than others?
None here has claimed their roles (honest or false) thats why I said its hard to start discussing about things "i vote this one for inactivity" "you vote him because you are evil" "and you support him becaseu you are evil too"
I am the batman!
No I am the batman!
I am Spartacus!
No I am Spartacus!
Ch3tan with regard to my vote shifting, its not really moving all that much, I'm consistent with who I'm voting for, its not like I randomly throw votes at as many people as I can then run off s******ing.
I've got strong feelings for voting for Vasc but as people have said voting for a guy because he is in-active isnt really good enough. Which is why I recently retracted my vote.
There are others amongst us who I feel could be baddies, I have no proof and (you saw this one coming) I think you could well be in league with Vasc as when I have voted for him you've came out quite aggresively in his defence, Fl3a has also done this but to a lesser extent, you're also pointing at Cal who has voted for Vasc and is currently voting for him.
Cal with your very quick switch of vote to me when Ch3tan said he thought either me or you was the bad guy was in my eyes a rather rash decision, save yourself by getting rid of the other person fingered, you then may have realised your decision was a mistake and switched your vote to Vasc again.
a mass roleclaim at this point is not a good idea. can you see why?
wow the swear filter is stupid sometimes!Aph3x said:Ch3tan with regard to my vote shifting, its not really moving all that much, I'm consistent with who I'm voting for, its not like I randomly throw votes at as many people as I can then run off s******ing.
I agree with this, it always seems a bit suspicious if someone makes a rather large amount of noise when someone puts a vote down on another. Could be a sign of people in league.Aph3x said:There are others amongst us who I feel could be baddies, I have no proof and (you saw this one coming) I think you could well be in league with Vasc as when I have voted for him you've came out quite aggresively in his defence, Fl3a has also done this but to a lesser extent, you're also pointing at Cal who has voted for Vasc and is currently voting for him.
I'm starting to think along these lines. As others have said you can't burn someone for inactivity. But theres a line to be drawn and you reach a stage where you begin to think there may be an ulterior motive to it.Cerb said:vasc i think you intended to keep quiet, go under the radar if you will and its backfired because you did it a little too much in my opinion so for that reason
Funny how you only speak when I vote for Vasc.
Hopefully after today's lynch things will get a lot more clearer
what tris- said really. I mean yes a lynch will bring some clarity onto the situation. but you must have some thoughts on everything. A bad feeling that you have about anyone. Anything you notice which isn't right?
Just 1 comment, even with low contribution Im following the whole game. And honestly, voting basing on activity is a nono.
Untill ppl start putting off their maskes I dont have any hooks to grab in regards of accusing one or another.
Being said that, here I come:
- I'm a vanila townee (once more, curse you Gamemaster!!) and my only notable event is Levin bitting me and spreading the "inactivity" infection for a couple of hours, which was promptly cured after saying "hello Im still here" some pages ago.
*opens fire*