The question which the House asked the Committee is whether the House had been misled by Mr Johnson and, if so, whether that conduct amounted to contempt. It is for the House to decide whether it agrees with the Committee. The House as a whole makes that decision. Motions arising from reports from this Committee are debatable and amendable. The Committee had provisionally concluded that Mr Johnson deliberately misled the House and should be sanctioned for it by being suspended for a period that would trigger the provisions of the Recall of MPs Act 2015. In light of Mr Johnson’s conduct in committing a further contempt on 9 June 2023, the Committee now considers that if Mr Johnson were still a Member he should be suspended from the service of the House for 90 days for repeated contempts and for seeking to undermine the parliamentary process, by:
a) Deliberately misleading the House
b) Deliberately misleading the Committee
c) Breaching confidence
d) Impugning the Committee and thereby undermining the democratic process of the House
e) Being complicit in the campaign of abuse and attempted intimidation of the Committee.
We recommend that he should not be entitled to a former Member’s pass.
He's a total cunt. Still claiming a Kangaroo court is sanctioning over a cake rather than the fact that he deliberately lied to parliament, repeatedly.Result....even more Trumpian sounding clap trap from Boris.
He's a total cunt. Still claiming a Kangaroo court is sanctioning over a cake rather than the fact that he deliberately lied to parliament, repeatedly.
Scumball shouldn't be allowed near parliament he deliberately undermines at every opportunity.
LolBoris Johnson breaks ministerial code with new Daily Mail job
Vetting committee say the former prime minister should have cleared his new column with them first.www.bbc.co.uk
Not first time he did it for the exact same thing.
We will pay. The owners profits must not be stopped.Welcome to the future for all water companies in the UK:
Thames Water in urgent funding talks amid fears of collapse
Whatever happens to firm, which serves a quarter of the UK population, water supplies will continue as normal.www.bbc.co.uk
And nothing will happen anyway.We will pay. The owners profits must not be stopped.
Different reasons though. China, despite current allegiances, doesn't want to be reliant on Russia and Saudi etc in the long term. I suspect they also don't want too much climate change but it's probably a secondary driver.This is so dangerous:
China on course to hit wind and solar power target five years ahead of time
Beijing bolstering position as global renewables leader with solar capacity more than rest of world combinedwww.theguardian.com
We really need to demostrate that liberal democracies can organise better than oppressive cuntland.
By the knackers!Nadine Dorries and Jacob Rees-Mogg accused of interfering with Partygate probe
Nadine Dorries and Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg are among MPs criticised for attacking investigation into ex-PM.www.bbc.co.uk
Really, every last one of them needs suspending for at least 10 days.
UKIP / Trumpists.Yes, he is very Tory, the Tory party...aren't. They evolved out of the Tory movement. I don't even know what you would call them now.
UKIP / Trumpists.
Aaaand, nope:That's certainly a view you can hold, especially if you're a bit of a mental, but it doesn't really reflect reality in any way. The current "Tories" seem to have lurched massively left in actions, if not rhetoric - highest taxes is god know how many years, immigration at record levels and people being asked to bank elsewhere if someone doesn't like their views.
A load of hand wringing about us copying one of the EU migration policies by sending people to Rwanda doesn't really change the fact we're not far away from the dreaded uniparty situation, where the only choice is what flavour you want your incompetence.
Aaaand, nope:
Do any European countries send asylum seekers to Rwanda? - Full Fact
Claims that Denmark and other EU countries do so are missing context.fullfact.org
Different schemes that do not break the Refugee Convention because they have either not yet applied for asylum in the EU country or they were being proposed for processing in Rwanda, not asylum.
As to Trumpists, their new candidate for London Mayor loves Donald.
They didn't send migrants to Rwanda who'd already applied for asylum in the EU since that's illegal under international law.That seems to be saying that the EU sent migrants to Rwanda as it's a safe country?
Anyway I'll soon be able to give you a first hand account of how the Government are handling the migrant crisis, as we've just heard the student accommodation about a mile up the road is being converted to house asylum seekers, which is nice. Not sure where the remaining students are going to go, but nay mind.
Not sure what I'm looking forward to more, lots of bored people hanging around or the inevitable placard carrying nutters blocking the road.