Question Do you honestly believe 9/11 was a US government conspiracy?

Do you honestly believe 9/11 was a US government conspiracy?


  • Total voters
    70

Ceixah

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
1,444
All I'm curious about is why people keep bringing up jet fuel?


WTC7 just spontaneously combusted - hence why people are questioning its destruction.


I am curious to know the exact mechanics of how the fire started in WTC7.

One thing I laughed about was - "Unlike that of the Twin Towers, the collapse of 7 WTC had been anticipated for several hours and the building had been evacuated."


From what I could gather though the collapse was due to fire?

if a fire was raging for "several hours" surely that'd be enough time to put it out?

yes obviously fire services etc would have been concerned with the twin towers... .but I'm fairly confident they'd have been part of the evacuation no?


I don't really care about 9/11 personally extremely sad that some 3,000 people died yes, but then came the "war on terror" which by definition will never end :|
 

Gumbo

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
2,361
They couldn't put it out because they had no water pressure.

One thing is very clear though.

The conspiracy nuts have never played Jenga.
 

Ceixah

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
1,444
That would make sense I guess :>


why didn't they just use 1 very large fire blanket ;)


FEAR NOT MATES I HAVE A BLANKET!
 

old.user4556

Has a sexy sister. I am also a Bodhi wannabee.
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
16,163
Yeah great, now answer my question without linking to random Wiki pages.

WTC 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 have all had to be rebuilt as a result of the attacks, what makes 7 so special to the conspiracy nuts when 3, 4 and 5 were demolished anyway.

I'm typing this off the top of my head, but IIRC there was something housed / stored / based at the bottom of WTC7 that was of conspiracy importance.

Edit, here it is from the beeb.

As well as housing offices of leading financial companies, Tower 7 also had some unusual tenants: the Secret Service, the CIA, the Department of Defence and the Office of Emergency Management, which would coordinate any response to a disaster or a terrorist attack.

Dylan Avery, the writer and director of the internet film Loose Change, thinks the building was suspicious:

"You have to look at what was inside Building 7. You had the largest CIA field office ... you had a number of government agencies inside the building.

"So automatically, for a number of people, myself included, that is enough to at least raise an eyebrow."

Some people argue that the US government had to demolish Tower 7 because it is where plans were hatched for a massive conspiracy on 9/11 and even that the hijacked planes were guided to their targets from Tower 7. Others believe the government also wanted to destroy key files held there about corporate fraud.
 

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,517
All I'm curious about is why people keep bringing up jet fuel?


WTC7 just spontaneously combusted - hence why people are questioning its destruction.


I am curious to know the exact mechanics of how the fire started in WTC7.

One thing I laughed about was - "Unlike that of the Twin Towers, the collapse of 7 WTC had been anticipated for several hours and the building had been evacuated."


From what I could gather though the collapse was due to fire?

if a fire was raging for "several hours" surely that'd be enough time to put it out?

yes obviously fire services etc would have been concerned with the twin towers... .but I'm fairly confident they'd have been part of the evacuation no?


I don't really care about 9/11 personally extremely sad that some 3,000 people died yes, but then came the "war on terror" which by definition will never end :|

Big chunks of the North Tower fell on WTC7, leaving a 10 story gash down the south face of the building and hole in the middle. Fires (understandably) started because of this, that the fire dept. couldn't put out because there was no water pressure in the area, so with everything else going on, they left it to burn. Eventually the fire ripped out the core of the building and destroyed a key support beam and the building came down. The end.
 

Ctuchik

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
10,467
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.com/2011/08/911-part-5-wtc-7.html

The significance of this particular building is not lost on some people. Despite the building being pretty much empty, some have claimed that Mayor Rudy Guiliani’s command centre (which allegedly orchestrated the events in WTC Plaza) was based in WTC 7. Whilst it is hard to prove this, it would be convenient to destroy evidence of said operation in the collapse. It has also been widely recorded that the CIA’s undercover “New York Station” was housed in WTC 7. Whilst it has been documented that over a billion dollars of gold were stored in WTC 4, it is also claimed that Gold Bullion was stored in WTC 7 too. This may be corroborated by eyewitness accounts of Gold Bullion being found in tunnels under WTC 5, when the site was being cleared.

So another primarily guesswork theory.
 

old.user4556

Has a sexy sister. I am also a Bodhi wannabee.
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
16,163
I rememeber quite clearly from the day that WTC 7 wasn't the only building that was feared to collapse. There was a concern about the World Financial Centre over the road, but that could have just been the beeb talking mince.
 

Tuthmes

FH is my second home
Joined
Jun 18, 2004
Messages
5,495
Yeah great, now answer my question without linking to random Wiki pages.

WTC 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 have all had to be rebuilt as a result of the attacks, what makes 7 so special to the conspiracy nuts when 3, 4 and 5 were demolished anyway.

If you hade clicked the link you would have seen it led to the tenants of that building. Arguing with someone but not taking time to listen/look at someone's opinion/message. Well done.
 

Tuthmes

FH is my second home
Joined
Jun 18, 2004
Messages
5,495
From what I could gather though the collapse was due to fire?

if a fire was raging for "several hours" surely that'd be enough time to put it out?

Correct. The problem was that a lot of fireman died when the 2 towers collapsed (i'd asume a lot of equipment, etc aswell). They didnt have the resources and or time to take care of tower 7.
 

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,517
conspiracy loonies said:
Some people argue that the US government had to demolish Tower 7 because it is where plans were hatched for a massive conspiracy on 9/11 and even that the hijacked planes were guided to their targets from Tower 7. Others believe the government also wanted to destroy key files held there about corporate fraud.

The phrase "really fucking MASSIVE sledgehammer to crack a nut" springs to mind here. Are people really claiming that the best way to destroy conspiracy files in a building you already have access to, is to fly planes into the buildings next door and blow up your building in the confusion? Really? So what if the twin towers hadn't set WTC7 on fire? Then dropping WTC7 independently wouldn't have worked would it? The "conspiracy" relies on so many sequential events happening exactly as required with no margin for error in order to work. I think a few of these nutcases need to read their Von Clausewitz and have a serious think about the odds of achieving such a complex sequence of objectives.
 

Gumbo

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
2,361
If you hade clicked the link you would have seen it led to the tenants of that building. Arguing with someone but not taking time to listen/look at someone's opinion/message. Well done.

I looked, but the thing is, there's hundreds of office buildings in the states within which the CIA rent some space.

They hardly ever fall down.
 

Tuthmes

FH is my second home
Joined
Jun 18, 2004
Messages
5,495
I looked, but the thing is, there's hundreds of office buildings in the states within which the CIA rent some space.

They hardly ever fall down.

Well I'd agree, but I can think of a couple of reasons why you wouldnt want anyone to see whats in there. It's not just the CIA that whas in there but also:

United States Secret Service
Internal Revenue Service
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

And quite a few banks/insurance companies.
 

n00b

Loyal Freddie
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
109
You call ~90.000 liters (per plane!) of burning jet fuel "a little fire"?

Are you actually looking things up before you post or are you just making stuff up like most other conspiracy theorists? This is exactly what i talked about earlier.

Jet fuel fires can be as hot at 1200 degrees, steel melts at 800. The air itself rarely becomes hotter then 900 degrees, but that alone would still make steel melt.

And at that heat, even concrete will start to weaken and lose it's strength.

You understand i was talking about WTC 7 right?
Did you see any airplanes hit that building, or did you see any kind of structural damage from all the pictures you can see of that building?

And for the love of god, i am talking about WTC7 so stop trying to explain WTC 1-2 to me.
 

Zarjazz

Identifies as a horologist.
Joined
Dec 11, 2003
Messages
2,417
thread tl;dr but let me get this right ... the 9/11 conspiracy hatched at WTC7 was to crash two jets next door ? sounds logical to me.
 

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,517
You understand i was talking about WTC 7 right?
Did you see any airplanes hit that building, or did you see any kind of structural damage from all the pictures you can see of that building?

And for the love of god, i am talking about WTC7 so stop trying to explain WTC 1-2 to me.

Yes. A ten-story gash caused by the collapsing North Tower. Again.
 

Gumbo

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
2,361
You understand i was talking about WTC 7 right?
Did you see any airplanes hit that building, or did you see any kind of structural damage from all the pictures you can see of that building?

And for the love of god, i am talking about WTC7 so stop trying to explain WTC 1-2 to me.


wtc7swd.jpg


Nope, no structural damage there at all.
 

Ceixah

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
1,444
Looks like godzilla damage that....


Enter the Godzilla conspiracy - The japanese finally tamed the beast. sent him to the states as revenge for the revenge attack after pearl harbour....


US Blamed Al-Qaeda because they were too stubborn to give the japs credit for such a powerful attack...


few years later a mysterious tsunami destroys a large portion of japan...


INTERESTING!


(an example of how easy it is to make something out of nothing)


that dmg on the corner looks pretty nasty though it has to be said :>
 

Tom

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
17,361
You understand i was talking about WTC 7 right?
Did you see any airplanes hit that building, or did you see any kind of structural damage from all the pictures you can see of that building?

And for the love of god, i am talking about WTC7 so stop trying to explain WTC 1-2 to me.

Do you see any explosives within WTC7? Do you see any wiring, cutting or preparation for a controlled demolition?

Jesus. Some people.
 

BloodOmen

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
18,166
looks like godzilla damage that....


Enter the godzilla conspiracy - the japanese finally tamed the beast. Sent him to the states as revenge for the revenge attack after pearl harbour....


Us blamed al-qaeda because they were too stubborn to give the japs credit for such a powerful attack...


Few years later a mysterious tsunami destroys a large portion of japan...


Interesting!


(an example of how easy it is to make something out of nothing)


that dmg on the corner looks pretty nasty though it has to be said :>

GODZILLAS ROAR - YouTube

roughly translated: don't blame it on me you bastard.
 

Keitanz

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
2,760
Please stop the insults at others just because they believe differently, this is not the 1970's any more, sorry.

People can believe what they want, right or wrong.

I know that most people in here are being brainwashed by the govermnent but still.
 

Krazeh

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 30, 2003
Messages
950
Please stop the insults at others just because they believe differently, this is not the 1970's any more, sorry.

People can believe what they want, right or wrong.

I know that most people in here are being brainwashed by the govermnent but still.

You're right, people can believe what they want but believing in something doesn't mean that it's not open to ridicule, especially when it's crackpot bullshit.
 

Fafnir

Resident Freddy
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
3,024
Please stop the insults at others just because they believe differently, this is not the 1970's any more, sorry.

People can believe what they want, right or wrong.

I know that most people in here are being brainwashed by the govermnent but still.
Uhm you asking people to stop insulting, still you end it with and insult?
 

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,517
Please stop the insults at others just because they believe differently, this is not the 1970's any more, sorry.

People can believe what they want, right or wrong.

I know that most people in here are being brainwashed by the govermnent but still.

Nope, don't think I will, if you insist on behaving like a retard, you're a retard. I'm all for healthy scepticism, its the foundation of the scientific method, but truthers have something seriously wrong with them.
 

Marc

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 28, 2003
Messages
11,094
Please stop the insults at others just because they believe differently, this is not the 1970's any more, sorry.

People can believe what they want, right or wrong.

I know that most people in here are being brainwashed by the govermnent but still.

You're an idiot. Not because you believe differently, but because, you are
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom