J
Jenk
Guest
Will cost you 120 gold.
I see plenty of sorcs every time I play.Of course, destruction has just as high a percentage of sorcs playing as there are BWs. Oh wait, they don't.
Follow your own advice.
Of course, destruction has just as high a percentage of sorcs playing as there are BWs. Oh wait, they don't.
Follow your own advice.
lol that was funny, even MORE sorcs then BW
I think for every Order archetype there are more of the corresponding Destro mirror classes
Percentages mean diddly squat if the two sides don't have equal numbers
Well the Destro class with the highest percentage is ........ Sorc or?
Percentages mean diddly squat if the two sides don't have equal numbers
Percentages mean diddly squat if the two sides don't have equal numbers
Actually - thats totally untrue
google "percentage" to see what it means
I know what it means
But talking of percentages is a straw man arguement if both sets are not equal
You can do so many fun things with statistics, if we look at t4 and t3 BWs are not only a higher concentration than Sorcs they also out number them.
I guess then that very many many many Sorcs sees many many Brightwizzards in game and complain about how OP they are.
That is what I find so amusing! It's really funny if you read through this thread.
I know what it means
But talking of percentages is a straw man arguement if both sets are not equal
But the fact remains that based on the data collected for that site there are more sorcs in the game than bright wizards.
It means if you take a random order character and a random destruction character you're more likely to get a BW than a Sorc...
So if you take a random sample of 12 order characters and 12 destruction characters you'll get more BWs than Sorcs...
Sorry
But again thats a straw man arguement unless you do nothing but play scenarios with equal numbers on both sides and each sides makeup always reflects the percentage popularity of the archetypes within the realm.
Tbh, I couldn't care less if they nerfed BW's
But the idea that Destro players are facing hordes of BW's that gets thrown out on every forum from here to WHA with a shortcut via VN does not reflect the simple fact that Order players as a whole are facing greater numbers of Sorcs.
Read it yourself
There are comparatively more destro than order
Therefore there are more sorcs than bw's
What's so hard to grasp?
If you want to pull the percentages game
Don't neglect to mention that there are a bigger percentage of WaR characters who are sorcs than BW's
Thats the problem with straw man arguements
They get blown over too easily
and they would have been quite right too
The War Journal Blog Archive Bright Wizard and Sorceress; One Way Mirror?
please shut up until you read it
Read it yourself
There are comparatively more destro than order
Therefore there are more sorcs than bw's
What's so hard to grasp?
If you want to pull the percentages game
Don't neglect to mention that there are a bigger percentage of WaR characters who are sorcs than BW's
Thats the problem with straw man arguements
They get blown over too easily
A very poor comparison of the two classes. It highlights all the BWs strongest points against all the Sorcs weakest. It completely misses the AoE line out which are at least as different as the other lines and in the Sorcs favour.
They talk about added utility but fail to mention that sorcs have a 1 second cast 5 second disarm and BW has nothing comparable.
There are some good points in there but some points are obviously the writer just wanting to bash BWs by comparing a powerful ability with a weak one for sorcs. In some arguments he complains how the sorc has to do something before they can use a certain spell, such as with arctic blast but negates to inform you that is what is needed for Stop, Drop and roll too (needing a curse and ignite respectively). Stop, Drop and roll is also a 13 ability in a mastery line where as arctic blast is a core ability.
Its also now outdated.
I dont think it was a poor comparison at all. I realise its out dated now, but in the context of the person I quoted it was completely relevant, if your going to argue a point atleast build it on facts.
Care to tell me which is so much better in the sorc AoE line? I had a quick browse down the destruction and conflagaration lines, pretty much everything has the same cast times and delve damage value.
I'll give you your point on the disarm, but lets be honest, who would take the disarm over playing with fire, boiling blood etc.
He's compared pretty much like for like on each spell, if you can point out an ability they he has compared incorrectly please do so.
He says that stop drop and roll consumes an ignite on the target? He's either written it badly by accident or intentionally. Lets face it, instant dot then instant knockdown is much easier and much more useful than instant dot, 2 sec cast for a 5 sec 40% snare. Yes its understood by everyone that SDaR is high in a mastery line, but its not like anything has to be sacrificed to get it as that line will be packed to the hilt because of all the other goodies in it. This is afterall why he compared to the same spell in the sorc's line (not arctic blast).