old.windforce said:And there is where it ends
Someone who camps an artifact for 10 hours is in what way a asset to the midgard community? In what way he tributes?
What is greed? camping an arti for cash? and who are you? the elected president of DAOC who can make new rules without parlement etc?
I thought GOA created this world and therefor entitled to make the rules
regards
JW
charmangle said:Sadly this post is a classic example of a person who has obvious problems understanding simple concepts.
You say: Im allowed to do what ever I want as long as it doesnt go against the CoC. But you cant grasp that other people will, if you choose to abuse other people as long as it is within the CoC, return the favour. And often 10 fold. Banning you from raids are withion the CoC, add on your fights are within the CoC, basically removing you from the part of the game that I like to play is within the CoC. Meaning that I just argue as you do...if you choose to treat others badly you will be treated badly back 10 fold.
This is not a hard concept to understand. So dont come complaining about the concequenses of your own actions vs others.
/Charmangle
ps. Your type of mudslinging/name calling way of arguing is just your ignorance shining through...ds.
charmangle said:Sadly this post is a classic example of a person who has obvious problems understanding simple concepts.
You say: Im allowed to do what ever I want as long as it doesnt go against the CoC. But you cant grasp that other people will, if you choose to abuse other people as long as it is within the CoC, return the favour. And often 10 fold. Banning you from raids are withion the CoC, add on your fights are within the CoC, basically removing you from the part of the game that I like to play is within the CoC. Meaning that I just argue as you do...if you choose to treat others badly you will be treated badly back 10 fold.
This is not a hard concept to understand. So dont come complaining about the concequenses of your own actions vs others.
/Charmangle
ps. Your type of mudslinging/name calling way of arguing is just your ignorance shining through...ds.
charmangle said:you are dealing with real life people here and they and their friends and their friends in turn will dispise your behaviour if you just run in and kill a mob they have been waiting for for 10 hours or so...
charmangle said:Sadly this post is a classic example of a person who has obvious problems understanding simple concepts.
You say: Im allowed to do what ever I want as long as it doesnt go against the CoC. But you cant grasp that other people will, if you choose to abuse other people as long as it is within the CoC, return the favour. And often 10 fold. Banning you from raids are withion the CoC, add on your fights are within the CoC, basically removing you from the part of the game that I like to play is within the CoC. Meaning that I just argue as you do...if you choose to treat others badly you will be treated badly back 10 fold.
This is not a hard concept to understand. So dont come complaining about the concequenses of your own actions vs others.
/Charmangle
ps. Your type of mudslinging/name calling way of arguing is just your ignorance shining through...ds.
ViPeOuT said:It's difference between someone actually being there waiting for the encounter to pop for 10 hours or if someone left a bot there while being AFK.
With this "rule" it's in theory possible to enforce it so that you can claim an artifact 24/7 if you can keep a character logged in at the encounter at all times. Now tell me in what way that is respect for your fellow players...
This rule of yours benefits those with too much time on their hands and/or the posibility logging a bot even if they're doing something else.
Sure if there is a group gathering at the encounter you can be nice enough to let them do it or even help for the chance to roll or just to get the encounter... but letting 100 "CampBotThirtyseven" lock all the encounters just because they have the means AFK-camp all day is just plain silly.
`charmangle said:Sadly this post is a classic example of a person who has obvious problems understanding simple concepts.
You say: Im allowed to do what ever I want as long as it doesnt go against the CoC. But you cant grasp that other people will, if you choose to abuse other people as long as it is within the CoC, return the favour. And often 10 fold. Banning you from raids are withion the CoC, add on your fights are within the CoC, basically removing you from the part of the game that I like to play is within the CoC. Meaning that I just argue as you do...if you choose to treat others badly you will be treated badly back 10 fold.
This is not a hard concept to understand. So dont come complaining about the concequenses of your own actions vs others.
/Charmangle
ps. Your type of mudslinging/name calling way of arguing is just your ignorance shining through...ds.
Calo said:So.. we have to be scared of you because you will add on us(oh no,the horror) and you will ban us from raids(while there are 10others where we are more then welcome on)?
yep, good way to scare people away.
Calo said:So.. we have to be scared of you because you will add on us(oh no,the horror) and you will ban us from raids(while there are 10others where we are more then welcome on)?
yep, good way to scare people away.
old.windforce said:`
Lets put this in perspective: I don't agree with you and i therefore fail to grasp simple concepts. translated that means you are simple? or i don't agree with simple?
Anyway enough putting words in my mouth. As Vippe says camping artifacts with articampbot39kkthxbbunQQb is perfectly fine with me. I will respect that since that is the local folklore of good manners (as i said before, how is that for grasping simple concepts?)
I didn't see any mudslinging by the way, i just ask the basic questions everyone should do against self proclaimed autority.
Bahumat said:This post is interesting, if you think "fuck vavi i'll do what i want when i want" he can stop people from doing raids, i have never heard of you or bluesky so i dont know how much potential power you have. Could you make their lives harder? do you get involved with alot of ml raids/cata raids thus the ability of preventing people from coming?
Then their's the flip side, if someone is camping an arte i think its fair to ask them about it, do they have ppl inc, are they afk. To be fair the 10 minute rule is a bit long, i think you should give someone 5 minutes, if they reply they have a further 15 minutes to get people there for the encounter. If they dont appear to have anyone inc you can claim the arte and he can leech credit.
Now here's the rub, Does Bluesky and Vavi have enough manpower to make your lives harder? if yes then im afraid we have to bite the bullet and follow his rules, if he's a random guy, one of many who can lead big raids you can say "go fuck yourself".
This whole post basically lies on the above statement (untill the patch), im keen to see if they have enough power to make people follow their idea.
p.s. dont use my thread to insult me or my thoughts, its merely an observation and i have in NO WAY told you what choice i would make.
Bahumat said:Now here's the rub, Does Bluesky and Vavi have enough manpower to make your lives harder? if yes then im afraid we have to bite the bullet and follow his rules, if he's a random guy, one of many who can lead big raids you can say "go fuck yourself".
Ingafgrinn Macabre said:Gotta stand with Vav and Blue here.
and banning a whole guild for arti-stealing is in my opinion not harsh. If someone in reduco were an arti-stealer and I got confronted by the person who got the arti stolen from, or by his GM (with screenshots) I would have a very good talk with the person and possibly even boot him if it's a hopeless case. The name and reputation of the guild gets damaged by those kinds of persons and I don't want them in.
vavires said:Its not that simple, as he sais His friend, his friends friends ect...
Well to be childish, hes my friend, Bluesky ismy friend and supports me fully state din his message. Bluesky has a lot of friends... maybe u should be.
charmangle said:So as you see its not 1 or 3 people we are talking about here...its a community...so discussing the power of a singular individual becomes irrelevent.
Calo said:So it is true that you guys try to scare off ppl with banning them from raids?
And where did charmangel think all excal ppl think like that? the majority of our server is very kind. I'v done many arti's and tbh, iv never had anyone stealing anything from me, so where did you get the idea of that?
And sure, if someone is camping an arti with his main, its fine, but putting a fucking bot next to it... nope.
Calo said:So it is true that you guys try to scare off ppl with banning them from raids?
And where did charmangel think all excal ppl think like that? the majority of our server is very kind. I'v done many arti's and tbh, iv never had anyone stealing anything from me, so where did you get the idea of that?
And sure, if someone is camping an arti with his main, its fine, but putting a fucking bot next to it... nope.
Bahumat said:sorry maybe i never explained it well enough, alot of people can simply laugh at what your trying to achieve and carry on as they normally would. If some of the more PVE mass raid organised players start shutting doors on people, it will make them listen.
sometimes for people to listen they need to know the consequences of their actions...Can vavi and bluesky really cause enough ppl to listen? if they could stop you coming on their raids then is that a problem? do those 2 players organise most of the server stuff?
its all about power and i disagree about "a singular individual becomes irrelevent" if i said to you "log out daoc or i'll swear at you" you would laugh. However if i held a gun to you head and asked you to log out....you would.
its one extreme to another but the fact is for someone to listen their has to be consequences, the gun is simply a demonstration of the power.
I suppose my main question is. 'Does those 2 players have enough fingers in enough pies to cause one a problem'
Bahumat said:I have to agree with you here, a bot who cant use the item (usual /20 char called (artewatcher e.g.) should not be able to claim they are camping it.
If you want something and you're prepared to camp it, then you should do so with your main, or at least the character that needs it.
Someone mentioned RL queues earlier, imagine if you saw some random guy come up and queue for concert tickets, then he puts a cardboard cutout of himself in the queue, walks off into the local pub and an hour later returns, then stands where the cutout is...ofc in this example some poor sod has kept moving it forward for him.
ViPeOuT said:but letting 100 "CampBotThirtyseven" lock all the encounters just because they have the means AFK-camp all day is just plain silly.
Herjulf said:Yup, silly.
Also is the flaw in the nazi ruleset trying to be forced on the community.
Dont camp an encounter unless able to do it.
Its up to the one camping the encounter to have the ppl needed if it pops.
If i run around checking ancounters and my posse are able to relog+run from wherever they are. And we finish enc. We deserve it more.
I never seen danos walk around with a
"dont hit me,
i am owned by mr/mrs"
icampdayandnight giveme1hourtogetmypeoplehere" sign.
Its as easy as that.
There is no justice in the nazi ruleset trying to be forced here.
If it means me or any1 else being banned, we simply make our own raids. Since 90% prolly dont support that crap it shouldnt be any probs.
There should ofc be some kind of flexibility and co respect as with everything.
I wont hesitate one second if i see a campbot or solo char camping an artifact.
However, if i am at danos for example. That person have some ppl there and have started peeling the adds. Then they have started.
And ofc should be able if the right ppl to complete the encounter.
Its a matter of common sence to me where the line is drawn.
Blue and vav should see the immense stupidity in campbots/solo ppl camping having priority over ppl actually being able to complete an encounter.
If mr campalot idles there... no.
The needs of the many...
Im overstating things to make them more clear. Ofc not all are the same there might not even be a majority etc
vavires said:Have u read my intial post?
vavires said:Its also up to the player camping to respond to the player asking the questions.
There are cases where ppl do AFK-camping. If the person doesnt reply u in the next 10 minutes hes presumed as a AFK-camper. So at that time U can take the right upon u to claim the mob.
ViPeOuT said:With this "rule" it's in theory possible to enforce it so that you can claim an artifact 24/7 if you can keep a character logged in at the encounter at all times. Now tell me in what way that is respect for your fellow players...