Cromcruaich
Can't get enough of FH
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2004
- Messages
- 2,767
Sharkith said:Once more respect to you for being so helpful and open. I also appreciate the purging of the thread it is simply an important issue that we need addressed and Mythic need to know about pure and simple.
I accept what you say above and I kind of anticipated your response to this because we had run through it. Now you have said it you have to admit that in fact you agree with the definition I gave you that it is the intent of the player that matters.
The question we should now consider is just how practical the definition is and then we then get to see just how hard your position is over this.
On the notion of grief play you agree with me that you have to be able to read intention and that is obviously going to be very difficult for you to enforce because it opens all sorts of issues up. We had evidence right here in the thread when Manisch and Fatload went at each other of the kind of can of worms this could open up. Would adding or ganking soloers be seen as griefing for example? I think we all know how stupid that debate has been. This is almost the same.
Where you critically miss the point however is that I felt that if a persistent pattern of behaviour existed as your player base perceived there to be that you should immediately try to do something to a) either quell the rumors or b) warn those doing it that their actions because they were repetitive risked being seen as intentially attempting to grief the server.
Showing that you cared and letting people know that the situation was being monitored would have been enough for many people. However having said this I fully appreciate Requiel that you cannot babysit a community and this then brings me to the crux of the issue and the possibility of the solution.
Clearly this is a problem within the community. As part of that community we are all responsible for what happens. Asking for the hosts of the game to arbitrate is impractical. This should have been solved by the community for the community. It could even have been done through roleplay.
What if we had a voluntary charter call it 'sportsmanlike conduct' or something that people could sign up to? That a series of agreed actions following such a raid could be undertaken to avoid such conflict in future. One such action would be lowering the relic keep and all towers - where guilds had agreed to sign up to the charter. The charter could even allow people to defend under the conditions of the lowered keep so that there is still a defence albiet a more sportsmanlike one.
A charter could specify the right procedure to follow that such action could only be taken if the majority of Guild masters had agreed. Clearly then when lowering the keep the intention is not to grief others but to promote fair and decent play on the server. People could even agree to stand aside and publicly state that they will simply not condone attacks like this on the community. That they are signed up to the charter and this outlines their beliefs.
This is within the spirit of the game and what is more it is positive because it is the community trying to work out its own problems with out putting you and GOA in a silly position.
What I was completely surprised by was the honesty of Kagato, Kinetix and Blow. Respect to them for their honestly in this situation because it allows us to try and bring more of this out than we could have otherwise. What I noticed them all saying was that there should be more deliberation and more discussion by TT and I know some TT members could agree now that maybe more discussion would have helped. How do they see what I am suggesting for example?
Clearly there is potential here for a unique solution.
Not the creation of yet more rules but the generation of a way to come together and discuss how to deal with these incidents. Thats all.
If the community could solve it it would speak volumes of that community. You told me that this was unworkable and I actually still believe it is possible. A community problem should be allowed to be sorted out by the community and you should do exactly what your doing now - try to get people to dicuss it meaningfully.
You should also encourage them to reach a meaningful solution. One possible answer was the charter. I am willing to see if others can be developed. I would even help such solutions if people could agree to do it positively.
All servers have their rules and guidelines why we never developed any escapes me.
edited for crappy English (this is what happens when I don't drink!).
I think your breaking your balls over a completely lost cause. Interesting discussion to have, though overall, from the Requeils responses, absolutely nothing will come out of it, GoAs hands are tied apparently, they cant enforce anything, they cant make any changes, people will not sign up to any charter and there are hardly enough people to make it pratical anyway. Just a PR exercise in my view.
Ive grown very weary of the whole thing, especially telling is the reluctance to accept in any way that the actions against TT were totally out of proportion and unjustified within the CoC as it stood at the time against some of the arguments here indicating that they are unable to take any actions against persistant AC raiders.