Sharkith
Can't get enough of FH
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2005
- Messages
- 2,798
Manisch Depressiv said:I think this discussion is a dead horse. There are a lot of lame things you can do in this game Requiel, walk-trough, strafe, relic raids with little defense if you want, RR11 vs RR3 group, 8 vs 1, certain classes and so on. It is all by design, if it upsets players when it's repeated often and when it's hurting the playerbase, change the design. Change the design of how relics are taken, voila. Mythic did start a good way with the class changes, so this could be possible.
The second thing is the human nature, some people will just whine because of a lost relic like a lost toy but you will often find them in a category that is definatly causing some grief to some other players, so I think the whine is unjustified.
Dyvet is going bad atm, I know you are monitoring the situation, more and more people will leave unless there is something we can look forward to soon though.
This is more an expression of opinion rather than a direct argument. Lame play is not grief play. This is a crucial distinction. It is the specific 'intent' of the player to upset someone and spoil their game that is the crucial thing about grief play. There is an important difference.
Horner for example is a grief player he /rudes everyone he kills using his lame play. The move from lame to grief is actually quite clear. He gets away with it and GOA do nothing that escapes me. Although I have to admit I find him funny and he is after all mostly harmless
Not defining the problem and not dealing with clear cases if it that go on repeatedly simply astounds me especially when it was clearly damaging the population. I hope we can nail this down once and for all I really do.
Another example perhaps when I was soloing on Sharkith I got ganked one evening by a certain mid Zerg I think 5 times in a row. In the end they made a surrender sign to me and did not kill me the next time I went out. I got killed five times by lame play and in the end they recognised what they were doing and stopped. The grief player does not stop.
The only case of a relic raid recently by Albs that was not an AC raid was Muly's raid which just happened to go on longer than usual. In no way was this grief play or lame in my book - they deserved their relic. Kinetix and others have understood that it is griefing players. Why GOA do not escapes me at the moment. We can debate that issue and we will be debating the real problem here.
What has happened here is that a lot of people have been afraid to call it what it is. Once you stop calling it and AC raid and directly call it griefing it opens up a much more direct line of discussion. So lets have it. Lets not evade the question by asking why I feel upset and then asking me if my feelings are legitimate which is what you are doing Requiel. Ask the real question is it griefing?
By definition it is because we have had expressed here by several invidiauls that they fully intended to upset others and spoil their game when they took relics in the early hours. Other have admitted something that GOA could not prove i.e. that they did it over a sustained period of time. I for one had no idea it was 6 times.
Now rather than get into a witch hunt against people who have admitted this. I applaud Blow and Kinetix and kagato for being honest it help us see what is happening. Now we should stick to the point of the discussion. I hope for once it achieves something productive because this has cost me an awful lot of time to debate.