No you havent..you took the figures and because you didnt like me posting them..wandered off into side issues, while saying I didnt understand them, then descended into farce and finally posted a detailed breakdown of terrorism trends, which is hardly the point the article I posted from was making.
Thus ensued pages of trying to worm out of the plain fact that 5% of the world is causing more than 50% of the terrorism.
It was posted from the Guardian..hardly a right wing rag.
The article, quite simply pointed out that the ME terrorism figures/stats don't make good reading.
Thus ensued pages of trying to worm out of the plain fact that 5% of the world is causing more than 50% of the terrorism.
It's hardly a shock or gross fudging of figures is it, the 'its only high because the others have dropped' was a classic.
And if you read back you can see several people making suggestions for the figures and then deciding it was all bollocks and I was an idiot for posting it.
Possible because this is a thread about terrorism I am guessing.
Remember?
I could just copy and paste it.
That's called paraphrasing.
Institute for National Security Studies (Israel) - Wikipedia
They seem to have a sober methodology and are world respected...and also ..who doubts it..
100% of Muslims are obsessed with a small, Scottish fish and chip shop.
Allan's Snack Bar, Paisley - Restaurant Reviews, Phone Number & Photos - TripAdvisor
I watched it, was pretty goodIt's not surprising suicide bombers are Islamic. How that came about and why is the more interesting subject of conversation.
And, in fact, of fantastic documentaries that nobody can be arsed watching.
I thought the Japanese invented suicide bombing, surely the Kamikazee was the original.
I mean..with a bomb, as in suicide bomber.I thought the Japanese invented suicide bombing, surely the Kamikazee was the original.