Someone should tell all the states that have bent over backwards to bring these companies in to build - through subsidies, tax breaks, ignoring environmental laws/studies/concerns... - that "no US state would want data centres".
Someone should tell all the states that have bent over backwards to bring these companies in to build - through subsidies, tax breaks, ignoring environmental laws/studies/concerns... - that "no US state would want data centres".
So why did America really want Greenland? Is it because they wanted to deploy their Golden Dome there? Yes and no. They also wanted to turn Greenland into the primary location for housing data centres because it’s naturally cold, has access to virtually unlimited water for additional cooling, and has geothermal energy that would be sufficient to power the data centres.
Trump likely was offered billions if he could secure Greenland by firms like NVIDIA, AMD, and Microsoft, because realistically it’s the only place they could house all of their data centres. No U.S. state would want data centres because they would be a massive drain on already stressed power grids, consume a lot of water (likely significantly impacting drinking water supplies), and produce a lot of pollution in the immediate area.
And for what? All for AI — fucking AI again...
The USA isn’t done with Greenland yet. Mark my words: they will try again.
I'd rather be having a pop at the UK government here - since we're bending over backwards to site US datacentres in blighty, and our electricity bills will end up subsidising them.Someone should tell all the states that have bent over backwards to bring these companies in to build - through subsidies, tax breaks, ignoring environmental laws/studies/concerns... - that "no US state would want data centres".
I'd rather be having a pop at the UK government here - since we're bending over backwards to site US datacentres in blighty, and our electricity bills will end up subsidising them.
For a country with the highest power costs in the G7 that sounds fucking peachy.
I'd rather be having a pop at the UK government here - since we're bending over backwards to site US datacentres in blighty, and our electricity bills will end up subsidising them.
For a country with the highest power costs in the G7 that sounds fucking peachy.
O/H was working on a blue hydrogen plant in Teeside for the past few years. (Blue Hydrogen is a greenwashing scam itself, but hey...). They were going to place it right next to a SSSI.That I didn't know, where abouts?
Who's paying for all the network upgrades?Isn't one of the complaints businesses have is that they pay the highest power costs?
IE not subsidised by the tax payer?
okHow to remove @Scouse from the living, setup a surprise birthday party full of Labour supporters for him. Oh and host it on his farm in the big shed.
Sorry for derailing but thought I would try to inject a little humour, please don't post any replies to this.