Well. Biggest news right now: there seem to be some irregularities with the incineration of plastics, not all of it is being re-used and incinerated in a correct manner. One of our main newspapers asked for documents but the company in question were tipped off by some low-level government worker.
That might be it?
Swedish women aren't as fit as they used to be.
#prayforsweden
I mean..ffs, Scandanavia is the white peoples genetic pool base.
You can't send Africans there, we are only a 7th of the planet, Africa is net increasing by a half a million a week.
The maths don't look good for us.
Where is your source of this?I mean..ffs, Scandanavia is the white peoples genetic pool base.
You can't send Africans there, we are only a 7th of the planet, Africa is net increasing by a half a million a week.
The maths don't look good for us.
So are we back to the maths not looking good for us...30 million Africans in one year...Swedens total population..10 million.I think I might have missed a 0 in my math, but don't worry sweetheart, you won't have brown grandkids any time soon anyway.
1) So, you in favour or not of eugenics?
So are we back to the maths not looking good for us...
No I'm not in favour of eugenics, even though it is pretty well government and social policy now.
Downs and most detectable disabilities is now termination time for all but the most forthright parents.
Old people are much more likely to be shown the easy way out.
Euthanasia is creeping into our society..sentencing for assist is falling dramatically.
I believe white people need protecting because we are a highly diverse 'race'.
It could take mere centuries to get rid of us, but take millenia to get us back.
White people come in so many different types, where as the classic other races are almost entirely of one appearance.
Our spread of hair colour, facial features and eye colour is far, far greater than other identifiable 'races'.
We are a unique collection of gene mutations and shared culture, a minority who for a short period changed the world, now we need protecting from it sheer weight of numbers.
You're doing well with the information cherry picking again Job. What's the population growth of Europe?So are we back to the maths not looking good for us...30 million Africans in one year...Swedens total population..10 million.
Yet Africans are a protected minority in Sweden, it kinda looks silly when you zoom out.
No I'm not in favour of eugenics, even though it is pretty well government and social policy now.
Downs and most detectable disabilities is now termination time for all but the most forthright parents.
Old people are much more likely to be shown the easy way out.
Euthanasia is creeping into our society..sentencing for assist is falling dramatically.
I believe white people need protecting because we are a highly diverse 'race'.
It could take mere centuries to get rid of us, but take millenia to get us back.
White people come in so many different types, where as the classic other races are almost entirely of one appearance.
Our spread of hair colour, facial features and eye colour is far, far greater than other identifiable 'races'.
We are a unique collection of gene mutations and shared culture, a minority who for a short period changed the world, now we need protecting from it sheer weight of numbers.
You're doing well with the information cherry picking again Job. What's the population growth of Europe?
Also, anti abortion, anti euthanasia too. or are you pro abortion? Once again your wording is vage, likely due to the fact most of what you type is incoherent enough to put even your friend the potus to shame.
I'm just talking about white people, the genetic mutation will disappear, swamped by sheer numbers, I thinks its sad, thats all, and any other minority around the world would be protected, eventually we will, when we are down to just 10s millions.Not true in every society, certainly not true where I live! And as for old people, maybe, but I don't have a problem with that, especially as "the easy way out" is being shown 10-15 years later than it was even half a century ago.
Point 1. In a very short time genetic engineering will make colour choice irrelevant; chances are you'll be able to manage melanin production on the fly and be any shade you like (particularly useful for Australians, where a third of them get skin cancer), and change eye and hair colour.
Point 2. White people are genetically less diverse than black people, significantly so. There's less genetic diversity between someone from Beijing and someone from Bootle than there is between two African guys living 20 miles apart. Just because whites happen to have a few surface mutations doesn't mean anything, and you're wrong about facial features anyway; compare a Somali to a Nigerian to a San, they look nothing like each other.
The only point you make which is even slightly relevant is about culture, and I've already pointed out that skin colour has nothing to do with it. European culture is doing fine, and Islam aside, people are more than happy to assimilate.
I'm just talking about white people, the genetic mutation will disappear, swamped by sheer numbers, I thinks its sad, thats all, and any other minority around the world would be protected
I'm just talking about white people, the genetic mutation will disappear, swamped by sheer numbers, I thinks its sad, thats all, and any other minority around the world would be protected, eventually we will, when we are down to just 10s millions.
I know no one here cares, but Scouse asked me why and as usual ..racist.
As for Eugenics..not true where I live is hardly an argument...got a higher percentage of Downs kids or something?
The fact that you are happy with old people slowly becoming under more pressure to end it, has little meaning, as you are not old.
It is well known that Eugenics is simple steps towards designer babies, the process has begun and the UK is on the forefront of research.
And could make Swedish women fit again.As for the last point; the very designer babies that make your concerns about the extinction of white people utterly irrelevant.
In support of Job:Just look up racist
He's not said that. He's said he's "sad" that white people are goners.dictionary said:racist
noun
1. a person who believes in racism, the doctrine that one's own racial group is superior or that a particular racial group is inferior to the others
And asked three questions:Edit: I'm not going to dismiss your concerns as "racist" - happy to discuss on this question/answer basis.
1) what do you mean by "protected"?
2) how do you achieve "protection" effectively without causing more upset and upheaval than makes it worthwhile?
3) Why is it worthwhile? Other than "it's a bit sad" I can't see any downsides, and an awful lot of upsides. And surely on-balance the upsides win?
A policy of actively importing a genetic base that is about to become by far the largest on the planet, into a tiny enclave is the same as finding a small group of indigenous bees and saying 'fuck it, let's build a huge commercial bee industry here.I don't know what you mean by "protected" Job?
I pointed out that the "white race" only stops becoming white by choice. I.E. If white men and women decide they want to have babies with non-white people. It's totally voluntary. So, unless you're openly advocating not letting people into a country because of skin colour alone there's no mechanism to slow (you'll never stop) this happening.
If you do that you're telling white people that they can't fall in love with whomever they choose - and you're actively harming our culture - which for a long long time has been open and welcoming.
So two things 1) what do you mean by protected? And 2) how do you achieve "protection" effectively without causing more upset and upheaval than makes it worthwhile? (Even if it's worthwhile).
In fact - third thing: 3) Why is it worthwhile? Other than "it's a bit sad" I can't see any downsides, and an awful lot of upsides. And surely on-balance the upsides win?
Edit: I'm not going to dismiss your concerns as "racist" - happy to discuss on this question/answer basis.