I have an account..but the middus updates it on her PC.
I wouldnt have that evil app on my phone, ffs, it accesses all your contacts...looks at their picture, call history...everything it possibly could..right down to how you hold the phone.
Down at Facebook HQ there is an army of people working out how to extract and corelate every single bit of data they can...all to pay back the money they gave Zitenburger..its a fuckin outrage..the very description of capitalism gone mad.
Google and Mictoshite are no better..all the tech giants need raiding by special forces.
We're not talking about the victims, we're talking about the perpetrator.Well, Im sure the friends and relatives are comforted by the difference.
Thing A isn't bad because Thing B is bad.Well, Im sure the friends and relatives are comforted by the difference.
So Trump admiring Kim's absolute dictatorship is:No..its called treating all political tyrants and murderers the same.
Letting them off for convenience.
So Trump admiring Kim's absolute dictatorship is:
- a.) BAD
- b.) GOOD
I'm not even talking about whether Trump should appear to admire Kim and his regime. That can be a different argument.c) All part of the negotiation. From my experience, if you want to do a deal with someone (which, if we want peace on the Korean peninsula, we do, unless you think bombing Rocket Man to kingdom come will achieve this), you don't generally do this by calling them a bit of a cunt - you pay them compliments and build them up, even if you don't believe it yourself.
I'm not even talking about whether Trump should appear to admire Kim and his regime. That can be a different argument.
Trump plainly does admire him. (c.) is not relevant.
a or b please.
Peace for who? Not the people of North Korea presumably. They can go fuck because Trump thinks human rights don't matter. Strong leaders are all that's important.I'll go for b then, if it secures peace in Korea.
<spoiler>No, they'll still be at war with South Korea, we won't tell them the fighting has stopped. Cos it will be funny.
To be honest, seeing as we are completely guessing, I suspect regime change is on the (hidden) agenda here, but if you're trying to get him to give up his nukes first, then mentioning it now might not be the best idea.
He's bigging him up...I'm sure in reality he thinks he's a fat, short ass chink.I'm not even talking about whether Trump should appear to admire Kim and his regime. That can be a different argument.
Trump plainly does admire him. (c.) is not relevant.
a or b please.
Chink or nigger isn't actually racist, they are ethnic slurs.Oh, so Trumps racist like you now too? If he was black, would Trump think he was a fat short ass chink-nigger?
Maybe Trump privately thinks he's a tyrant and a murderer, but I've not seen overt racism from Trump. Unlike from you.
*queue @Job saying the use of the phrase 'chink' in this context isn't actually racist.
It's not out of respect, it's because they're legitimately terrified of him because of the countless atrocities he's committed against them.He speaks and his people sit up at attention.
Context, you knuckle-dragging fucking idiot.I presume somehow its OK for you to write chink-nigger...because?
And what exactly was my context..I was talking about someone elses inaginary thoughts.Context, you knuckle-dragging fucking idiot.
You have to be able to use the words to talk about them. Are you really that sub-normal?
No..its called treating all political tyrants and murderers the same.
Letting them off for convenience.