SPAM This thread is for random spam!!

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,625
The best evidence you can find is to walk into the nearest city.

Except it doesn't, and is the pretty much the worst way to understand what's going on in different countries or cities. If you went to San Francisco today you'd think the US had a homeless crisis of epic proportions, but the reality is that it has a couple of intense hotspots of homelessness but actually a very tiny problem at a national level. US poverty isn't about homelessness at all. In every country the causes, extent and measurement of homelessness are very specific, often down to city or even district level.
 

Embattle

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
13,737
I can see you facepalming gwadien Emb, but so far only Gaff has attempted to bring additional fact to the argument. You continue to poo-poo his argument offering only your opinion.

You mean the ones that back up at least part of my so called opinion, neither of which will change the narrative he wants to pursue as proven by his following comment.
 

Zarjazz

Identifies as a horologist.
Joined
Dec 11, 2003
Messages
2,437
Except it doesn't, and is the pretty much the worst way to understand what's going on in different countries or cities. If you went to San Francisco today you'd think the US had a homeless crisis of epic proportions, but the reality is that it has a couple of intense hotspots of homelessness but actually a very tiny problem at a national level. US poverty isn't about homelessness at all. In every country the causes, extent and measurement of homelessness are very specific, often down to city or even district level.

I'm been told by locals that the whole San Francisco / San Jose area is a peak homeless density for one simple reason. The weather.

"Come to California for your Homeless Holiday Hotspots."
 

Syri

FH is my second home
Joined
Jan 4, 2004
Messages
1,019
Typical thermal efficiency for utility-scale electrical generators is around 37% for coal and oil-fired plants, and 56 – 60% (LEV) for combined-cycle gas-fired plants.

An internal combusrion from fuel to back wheels is 25%

Grid transmissuon loss 2% which for some reason you think isnt worth factoring in..gets there by magic I guess.
So for a coal plant..36% to charger, then 5% for high current charger losses...34%.
Then heat and transmission loss in the Tesla from battery to wheels 60% efficient
So from the burning coal to driving the back wheels of a Tesla, thats 20%


Worse than a petrol car unless you figure in getting the fuel to the petrol stations.
Worse than a petrol car unless you figure in getting the fuel to the petrol stations.
Yes, of course, so let's just get rid of the stats that don't feed the view we're trying to portray! If you're factoring in the efficiency of getting the electricity to the charging point, then you have to factor in getting the fuel to the filling point. If you conveniently leave one out, that's called "fiddling the stats", and makes the entire point invalid. But then again, I can't really say that came as a shock to me by now...
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Yes, of course, so let's just get rid of the stats that don't feed the view we're trying to portray! If you're factoring in the efficiency of getting the electricity to the charging point, then you have to factor in getting the fuel to the filling point. If you conveniently leave one out, that's called "fiddling the stats", and makes the entire point invalid. But then again, I can't really say that came as a shock to me by now...
What even is that..what?

I broke it down for you..true I started with coal, but feel free to adjust it for more efficient generation.

Is it you just dont like to hear the truth.

I left it out because I cant find the losses from oil to forecourt fuel...took a reasonable guess that it adds enough to make even the worse generation slightly better.
Regardless, its not about Ecars its about the grid, that has to improve, the cars arent going anywhere without a massive battery tech improvement.
 

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,625
What even is that..what?

I broke it down for you..true I started with coal, but feel free to adjust it for more efficient generation.

Is it you just dont like to hear the truth.

I left it out because I cant find the losses from oil to forecourt fuel...took a reasonable guess that it adds enough to make even the worse generation slightly better.
Regardless, its not about Ecars its about the grid, that has to improve, the cars arent going anywhere without a massive battery tech improvement.

If you don't use coal as the start point, EVs immediately become more efficient than ICE, even using your own figures. You used coal because it made your argument work.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
I was pointing out that the efficiency advantage is nowhere as good as people think.
You burn fossil, turn it into steam, which spins a generator, that creates 3 phase, which is then transformed up to 25OKV, then back down to 250 single phase with transformers that are oil cooled, then the charger converts that to DC for the batteries, then the car controller makes it into 3 phase again...Teskas use gears and diffs rather than direct drive.
The losses along the way are 80% for coal..obviously irrelevent for nuclear.

Advantages no local pollution and with regen braking very little brake dust..just the tyres...oh and massive industrial strip mining for lithium.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
So Greta Thunbergs much heralded yacht trip across the atlantic actually requires two crew members to fly to bring it back...so she might as,well have flown herself.

Yes it was symbolic...but its also symbolic of how entrenched burning fuel is.
 

georgie

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
2,291
oh and massive industrial strip mining for lithium.

Whereas the Coal and Oil fairies bring the black stuff from the ground by magic.

This is one of those times where I can *kind* of see where you're coming from, but once again things are more nuanced than your back of the fag packet maths allows.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,092
Wasn't she invited along rather than them making a special trip of it?
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
If capitalism is your goal it will disappear.
Its a myth that its the 'lungs' of the planet and the farmers are rightly complaining that the jobs they are offered wont gets their kids through college.
No ones crying about the lost forests of Europe.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,092
If capitalism is your goal it will disappear.
Its a myth that its the 'lungs' of the planet and the farmers are rightly complaining that the jobs they are offered wont gets their kids through college.
No ones crying about the lost forests of Europe.

So we don't need trees for oxygen?

Okay.

Good to see the EU showing its global power though and getting Brazil to change its tune.

I wonder if the UK would have similar clout. Obvs not.
 

Embattle

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
13,737
If capitalism is your goal it will disappear.
Its a myth that its the 'lungs' of the planet and the farmers are rightly complaining that the jobs they are offered wont gets their kids through college.
No ones crying about the lost forests of Europe.

Not really, unless you believe in short term capitalism only.
It isn't exactly on the same scale as phytoplankton but it also isn't something you can afford to lose.
No one knew at the time as there wasn't a great deal of scientific evidence around.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,092
So Netflix & Bear Grylls did a programme on Modi where they're basically licking his arse a little bit.

That's a bit politically insensitive considering what's going on.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
But still.

You would think they were both products of the same marketing company.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,092
Y'all should watch American Factory on Netflix.

China is scary man.

Super scary.
 

Yoni

Cockb@dger / Klotehommel www.lhw.photography
Joined
Dec 11, 2003
Messages
5,028
From what i gather they aren't reliable long distance but rather be used in cities (as constant stop-go driving devours gas) to reduce particle emission and make for cheaper driving. Win-win would be a hybrid, gas for long mileage and electric for city-driving.
We have just got a petrol hybrid. Kris’ commute is 60km - c.10km per day is petrol (pure petrol 0.5l per 100km) - we charge at either end (2.5 hours) 2.50gbp per day as at work it is free. Instead of filling up the car every 2 weeks (with diesel we now fill up ever 2 months with petrol) - when only commuting. We took the car recently from Stockholm to Åre 650 km - we used 1.3 tanks for the return and used only electric for the 6 days - charging each evening. As well as the reduced fuel cost - the leasing cost (co car) is lower and the taxable benefit is 1/3rd of the last car. If we lived in a house in the ‘burbs we would have a full electric car. If we would go to Åre we would charge whilst taking a break from driving :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom