To be fair - I doubt the US gives a shit about counting them, what with all the other shit they don't care about.
It's just funny how you facepalm stuff but you refuse to talk about it, or give your opinion, you just shut down the argument with NOPE.
Sounds like a criticism of Remainers by Brexiteers, hmm.
But there isnt the charging stations in the uk yet. There are in norway. The tax breaks are great in the uk to out weigh the inconvenience.Yes they will. Tax. Tax is what got people into diesels and its what will (and is) getting people into EVs. The Tesla S isn't one of the most popular cars in Norway because its an EV, its because relative to other cars of a similar size its taxed massively less. BMW expect a quarter of all of the new 3-series sales in the UK to be the hybrid, purely because of the tax benefit. Throw in a an increasing number of ULEV zones in cities and electric will start to get traction in the next couple of years; primarily in plug-in hybrids at first (there are tons about to come to market in the next 12-18 months) and then full EVs.
NB. I don't actually think full battery EVs are the right choice for mass consumer use; hydrogen hybrids is actually the more sustainable choice but the infrastructure numbers don't work yet (they will when existing electrical grids come under pressure), so hydrogen may be the technology for 10-15 years' time, but in the meantime most of us will move to a hybrid or full EV over the next 5-8 years.
US social services suck big time. There isnt any long term unemployment benefit at a federal level.
Typical thermal efficiency for utility-scale electrical generators is around 37% for coal and oil-fired plants, and 56 – 60% (LEV) for combined-cycle gas-fired plants.Yes they fucking are you giant tit.
I'm saying this as someone who a) has a tech environment-related degree and b) someone who worked for 13 years at one of europe's largest power generating and distributing companies.
They're still shit, but way more efficient than internal combustion engines - which is what @Ormorof was actually talking about.
Of course, your lack of basic comprehension skills means you mixed up power generation with distribution and storage. Life must be incomprehensibly difficult when you've only a one-in-six chance of finding your ass with your hands...
But there isnt the charging stations in the uk yet. There are in norway. The tax breaks are great in the uk to out weigh the inconvenience.
Well you aren't saying anything new nor do the bias views you regularly spout show any change in your attitude and thus I see no reason to get in these silly repetitive short sighted arguments on the forum. I've personally avoided the brexit subject because it is the worst example of this but if you want to label me a brexiteer then I'll label you the perfect remoaner, in essence you just keep shouting and blaming everything on brexit and the conservatives until you are the last one talking.
Power stations arent wildly more efficient..those giant chimneys next to them are cooling towers that evaporate off wasted heat, factor in transmission losses, charging losses and battery heat loss...Tesla batteries are water cooled and thats,what powers the heater once you are going..plus the controller which is in the same water cooled circuit.
Then the huge weight of the batteries.
Typical thermal efficiency for utility-scale electrical generators is around 37% for coal and oil-fired plants, and 56 – 60% (LEV) for combined-cycle gas-fired plants.
An internal combusrion from fuel to back wheels is 25%
Grid transmissuon loss 2% which for some reason you think isnt worth factoring in..gets there by magic I guess.
So for a coal plant..36% to charger, then 5% for high current charger losses...34%.
Then heat and transmission loss in the Tesla from battery to wheels 60% efficient
So from the burning coal to driving the back wheels of a Tesla, thats 20%
Worse than a petrol car unless you figure in getting the fuel to the petrol stations.
We used ti do that but environmental concerns pushed the stations out into the country and we just steam it offInfrastructure problem of just evaporating all the heat, in Nordics the excess heat is used for heating water which gets pumped into central heating, incidentally also wildly more efficient than every house having a boiler...
We used ti do that but environmental concerns pushed the stations out into the country and we just steam it off
Forms the basis of a hypothesis but isn't a fact that proves it.US social services suck big time. There isnt any long term unemployment benefit at a federal level.
Ofcourse i havent put a study into the detail. Just the way my extended family have been as all my wifes side of the family live in small town america without great jobs if any jobs. And the social support side is less than the uk for them.Forms the basis of a hypothesis but isn't a fact that proves it.
Rigourous testing might, but until then it's no better than a (reasonable) guess.
But houses aren't in short supply in the US, you can easily pick up a trailer and consider yourself not homeless for $1k.
In the the UK that's virtually impossible.
Look at Germany's homelessness compared to us, that's a good comparison.