- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 36,094
Nice to know. TaThat's a shame. I've heard he's a massive fan of yours.
Nice to know. TaThat's a shame. I've heard he's a massive fan of yours.
Back when I played BF, you put in a fuckton of hours just to get a marginally better rifle.
So is the objection to having a paid option at all? Or because it's too expensive? Or because a single over-powered character shouldn't be in the game at all? (which would be my objection). Please don't make me go to reddit to find this shit out.
Yes, DAOC and BF is exactly the sameThats what kinda finished off DAOC, finding yourself playing against ludicrously powerul characters owned by people spending their entire waking hours in Atlantis.
No, its not. If there's "a prize every time", then they skirt the gambling rules (its a tombola not a raffle basically), because the transaction is an exchange (access to the prize pool) not a bet. I agree it sounds like a pretty shitty idea, but I also agree with @Raven, a fool and his money are soon parted. NB. Do loot boxes exist in games below PEGI 16?
Yes, DAOC and BF is exactly the same
I'm talking about in Law, not in dictionary.
Thats what kinda finished off DAOC, finding yourself playing against ludicrously powerul characters owned by people spending their entire waking hours in Atlantis.
I agree. Pay to win is the essence here. But also the kids expecting to get everything from the start. Without workig for it. If it was just the second i would say suck it up and get good. But its the two combined that really are the issueWhat a load of horseshit. For starters you can't compare the games at all since there was no pay to win element in DAoC. Secondly, if someone put in the hours to obtain the items and gain the playing skill necessary to wtfpwn people in DAoC then good on them. I'd say the same to anyone playing BF without paying to win.
Sometimes I think I've witnessed the depths of Human stupidity, then someone lets you near a keyboard.
Back when I played BF, you put in a fuckton of hours just to get a marginally better rifle.
So is the objection to having a paid option at all? Or because it's too expensive? Or because a single over-powered character shouldn't be in the game at all? (which would be my objection). Please don't make me go to reddit to find this shit out.
That's a shame. I've heard he's a massive fan of yours.
Rugby World Cup 2023: Irish 'disappointed' by lack of Scotland & Wales backing
Why?
Seems like that Eurovision 'vote for your neighbour' bullshit. fuck that.
Back when I played BF, you put in a fuckton of hours just to get a marginally better rifle.
[/QUOTE]I like that about Battlefield, but it pissed me off when EA keep fucking with the guns and gameplay dynamics. I'd be fucked off is someone bagged a Martini Henry just by paying for it, I earned that shit!
Lol. The whole point for paying is people like an advantage. Imagine the stigma from playing on paid servers? They wouldn't wear it.They should offer a server config that allows paid or earned players.