- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 36,725
1) Easy to factor for that. (They have to do it for all studies).It's not about not liking the outcome of the study, I just refuse to believe that study is 100% accurate given how shite most Americans health is anyway due to the poor quality of American foods.
2):
the literal classic smoker denialist "my nan smoked 20 a day and lived to be a hundred" argument...My nan has been using weed for decades for pain, she's 97 now, way above the average lifespan of people - never had a stroke or heart issues and eats healthy.
3)
This is just a science fail on your part tbh.Had that study been done almost anywhere but America, It'd hold more water.
Look. I get it. You smoke weed. (I used to myself). But why not simply accept that it's likely as bad for you as smoking tobacco and then do one of two things:
1) Crack on with your pungent hobby; or
2) Take a look at the evidence and decide to do something about it
Make a choice, one way or the other. That's way better than becoming an annoying smoker-denialist type.