old.Tohtori
FH is my second home
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2004
- Messages
- 45,210
Interesting mix of sex-offender-asylum-seekers you got going on here folks
Hmm welcomed them. I don't know what planet you are on but the abuse and racism that happened in the 50-80s before anti racism laws came in can hardly be called welcoming.I disagree, as I say, my friends family claim they came because they were practically fleeing a nation who didn't necessarily like them, a lot stayed yes, but arguably, that's like the whites in South Africa after the ANC got into power - they left voluntarily, but maybe not willingly.
The initial independence wave meant that you could trade your British passport for a Kenyan passport, but after that some Indians kept their British passport, but decided to stay in Kenya, after that there were some reprisals.
My point is, that they came to this country in the same respect that Somalians come to this country today - with relatively nothing and we welcomed them, and let them live in the UK and make a living for their selves, I find it highly hypocritical when an 'immigrant' says that we shouldn't allow asylum seekers.
Hmm welcomed them. I don't know what planet you are on but the abuse and racism that happened in the 50-80s before anti racism laws came in can hardly be called welcoming.
Watch the tv of the time like Alf Garnet and rising damp too I think.
I like our little public private story, you've pretty much ruined it.
No necessarily. They may have come with skilled jobs or just normal immigration. Not heard of many Indians or Kenyans seeking asylum.
I know several Ugandan Indians who's families came over in the 70s. There are lots of "coloureds" (as the South Africans called them) who came to the UK after working for the Empire in Africa who were forced out of African countries after decolonisation.
Which is better; snack sized bite, or bite sized snack?
Yes but you never see them repeated because of the language usedAlf Garnet wasn't racist. He purposely made a mockery of racism and racists. So did rising damp.
Bite sized snack. If you only take a snack sized bite out of a bigger thing and you love it then you're tempted to have more.
Either have a snack or have a meal
I disagree, as I say, my friends family claim they came because they were practically fleeing a nation who didn't necessarily like them, a lot stayed yes, but arguably, that's like the whites in South Africa after the ANC got into power - they left voluntarily, but maybe not willingly.
The initial independence wave meant that you could trade your British passport for a Kenyan passport, but after that some Indians kept their British passport, but decided to stay in Kenya, after that there were some reprisals.
My point is, that they came to this country in the same respect that Somalians come to this country today - with relatively nothing and we welcomed them, and let them live in the UK and make a living for their selves, I find it highly hypocritical when an 'immigrant' says that we shouldn't allow asylum seekers.
Disagree all you want, you are still talking shit Gwad.
My mate said....
Try first hand experience, both my parents and their extended families came to the UK from Kenya int he 60's and 70's.
You haven't a clue what you are on about.
My dad's parents stayed in Kenya because they had a very good life there and didn't feel under pressure to leave.
I am not saying some didn't leave because they felt their way of life was under threat, but comparing it to asylum is ridiculous. It was a side effect of the end of Empire.
Wikipedia said:Kenya achieved independence from Britain in 1963, and thereafter followed a period of volatility in African and Asian relations. Asians, along with Europeans, were given two years to acquire Kenyan citizenship which in turn would renounce their British passports. Out of approximately 180,000 Asians and 42,000 Europeans in Kenya at the time, fewer than 20,000 had submitted their applications by the deadline.[5]This in turn lead to growing animosity and distrust from Africans, and those who failed to take up Kenyan citizenship were deemed disloyal by their fellow countrymen.[6]
Those without Kenyan citizenship soon became subject to increasing discrimination by the ruling government. Asians in the civil service were sacked in favour of Africans, the Kenyan Immigration Act 1967 required them to acquire work permits, whilst a Trade Licensing Act passed in the same year limited the areas of the country in which non-Kenyans could engage in trade.[7]In the late 1960s and early 1970s, faced with a dim future in Africa, many Asians choose to utilise their British passport and settle in the United Kingdom. There are now sizeable communities of Kenyan Asians in London andLeicester.
*pushes DaGaffer forward & grins at Ch3t*Kind of thing that would be legitimate grounds for asylum in 2014...
Ops, not you...Your*
Damn polish and bulgarians coming here with their useful economic contributions!
http://m.bbc.com/news/business-29910497
uncontrolled immigration?
Freedom of movement is part of the cost of not going to war.
Instead of invading each others countries and killing each other we're pissed off that they make cheaper plumbers than us...
Sadly the same report also points out that non-EU migrants cost us an absolute bloody fortune (£120 billion iirc). Not that I think migration is a bad thing (far from it in fact), but uncontrolled immigration? Not such a great idea, mainly as it gives frothing mouth breathing Nationalists (UKIP, SNP, BNP etc) a stick to beat everyone with.