The Sun are reporting that we are in a £40m bidding war with United for Cesc. I can't help but see that as a mistake. He does not want to leave Barce, so this will be Barce wanting to cash in. But I bet Cesc will still see Barce as his home. So while we could have him for two years and get him back on track to become one of the best midfielders in the world when Barce want him back they will come back and unsettle him again to buy him on the cheap.
Apparently in his contract Arsenal have first refusal anyway, so it's probably all just guff at the moment.
The Sun are reporting that we are in a £40m bidding war with United for Cesc. I can't help but see that as a mistake. He does not want to leave Barce, so this will be Barce wanting to cash in. But I bet Cesc will still see Barce as his home. So while we could have him for two years and get him back on track to become one of the best midfielders in the world when Barce want him back they will come back and unsettle him again to buy him on the cheap.
Only if they are prepared to pay his buyout clause and meet his wage demands. They're making all the right noises about being a real player in the transfer market, but I really don't know if Arsenal would be prepared to stump up 26m for Fabregas.
I don't think any quality player just wants to sit on the bench, especially with a World Cup coming up. I also don't think he's stupid; if he came back to England I can't see him bouncing back to Barca when he's 28-29 to once again be fighting to fit into the system. Of course if Villanova goes, everything could change.
Well if the England U21s are any thing to go by it seems we will be waiting for sometime for the main team to improve in the future.
That's the bit that matters though you fucking pleb.To look only at the result doesn't really tell the whole story.
There's no technique, even at a very young age its all about results. we need to get kids playing fusbal on small pitches and make it all about 1-2 touch football.
Fuck me, my mind boggles at the audacity of the backhanders that must have happened to justify some of these builds.
Was reading the Economist the other month and they were whining about how Brazil's government is using a portion of it's huge oil wealth to help fund all sorts of social projects. The Economist didn't like that, not one little bit.
Maybe this is what happens when a market economy is set up so that not all of the wealth goes to line the pockets of a tiny amount of individuals?
Scouse, what's the point of building a 43,000 seater football stadium in the Pantanal, where the local football clubs get attendances in the hundreds? Or a stadium in Manaus, where no-one plays football because the heat and humidity will fucking kill you in about ten minutes if you try? Even in cities with a football culture like Sao Paulo and Porto Alegre they've built completely unnecessary new stadia rather than using existing facilities. In Porto Alegre's case Gremio only opened their new stadium six months ago.
I've got no problem with spending money on public works, I think it would be a better solution for Britain than blinkered austerity, but I've been to Brazil, more white elephant football stadia isn't what they need.
"I damaged Spanish football by being the manager that broke Barcelona dominance," the Portugese coach said.
"They were dominant and dominant and dominant and it looked like it was a dominance without an end.
"Real Madrid won the cup final against Barcelona, Real Madrid win the Super Cup against Barcelona, Real Madrid won in Barcelona and Real Madrid won the championship which is the historical championship of 100 points and 121 goals."
Scouse, what's the point of building a 43,000 seater football stadium in the Pantanal, where the local football clubs get attendances in the hundreds?