Vasconcelos
Part of the furniture
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2003
- Messages
- 4,022
Oh wait...
old?
old?
The whole point of what has happened is that it's not on the books anymore. The debt never had any interest eiher since it was Roman's money. In fact the debt only really existed in the books because being in debt to yourself doesnt really count.Lol Chelsea are such sneaky bastards, they are trying to claim they are now debt free so that they don't fall foul of the new UEFA laws related to debt levels. They are saying the £340 million they owe is no longer a debt because Roman is no longer charging interest, what a load of bollocks, it is still a debt and it resides on the clubs books.
End of the day they are £44 million a year in the red, those losses might be falling but they are still a long way from being self sustaining.
BBC News - Chelsea Football Club now 'virtually debt-free'
fs Soze, how hard is it for your lot to keep a clean sheet against pompey eh? Messing with my fantasy league score. Got a really tight h2h going on and need the points.
Also, 5-0 now, Ronney set up Valencia who finished well.
Our losses are steadily decreasing, once we ship players like deco and ballack we'll be well on our way (they earn like 11m between them)
And it's not debt, it's now equity, there's a difference.
Er no, there is no debt, it is now equity owned by Abramovic. Debt is something you have to pay back.
Lol Chelsea are such sneaky bastards, they are trying to claim they are now debt free
As I understand it they've turned his loan into shares instead. Same thing happens in all manner of companies the world over. Don't know if it is sneaky, but it is realistic.
What can Chel$ki do they only have so much marketability and do not have the support to fill a 60 or 70 k seater week in week out to make the money needed to compete?
Actually i'd say that'd quite easily fill a 60k, you underestimate the popularity of Chelsea these days.
I don't think i do a fair few times in the last 3 years you have had obvious non sell outs so adding another 20k empty seats is not a wise move or they would have looked into it already imo.
Same can be said with all top4 side having none sellouts though? Chelsea are becoming an increasingly popular team, they'll most deff beable to fill those seats if they were going to be added imo.
Wolves fan not Chelsea btw.![]()
Actually i'd say that'd quite easily fill a 60k, you underestimate the popularity of Chelsea these days.
I'm really not happy about Ruud going to you scum suckers, but the guy should be playing football. Real are stupid for wasting his ability.