Football The 2009/2010 Season Thread

Gray

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 25, 2003
Messages
3,465
Seen this on another forum, boy, Arsenal fans and Arsene might be pissed ;)

UEFA DIVING CLAMPDOWN ENDS WITH EDUARDO
Posted 03/09/09 08:38EmailPrintSave



UEFA's supposed clampdown on diving has been brought to a halt after just one case.


In an admission that is bound to further infuriate Arsenal after Eduardo was suspended for two matches for diving, the governing body has, reports The Times, 'confirmed that there are no plans to institute a regular programme of video referral for matches under its jurisdiction or issue an anti-diving directive'.


Rather than set a precedent that UEFA are determined to follow, the charge and subsequent banning of Eduardo is thus set to remain an arbitrary one-off, principally motivated by what The Times calls an 'unfortunate series of coincidences'. It would appear, as F365 reported at the time, that Eduardo has only been singled out because he committed his dive in a match against Scottish opponents broadcast on free-for-all television on a day of the week when no other high-profile games were being played.


'Article 10 (1c), which was introduced by Uefa as a consequence of the furore that followed Rivaldo's feigning antics when playing for Brazil in the 2002 World Cup, exists to punish the worst offenders, but there is no appetite at Uefa to mount a wholesale campaign against diving through the retrospective use of video technology,' reports the newspaper.


Arsenal have still yet to decide whether to appeal against Eduardo's suspension, with the governing body unable to provide the club with the rationale for banning the Croatian until later today. To date, all UEFA have faxed to the club is a single paragraph of text that reads, 'Having examined all the documents of the case which the player charged had likewise examined the control and disciplinary body decides that the player Eduardo is suspended for two Uefa club competition matches.'


The anomaly in that judgement is that Eduardo has been suspended for an offence that the rulebook stipulates should only receive a caution. Any hope that the governing body would issue an amendment to instigate a wider clampdown has, unfortunately, already been dashed. 'Although Eduardo's suspension is similar to that which might accompany a red card, Uefa will not now ask referees to send players off for such offences,' reports The Guardian.


While the news will meet with general disappointment, Uefa's handling of the Eduardo case perhaps suggests that their withdrawal is just as well. Of the two faxes sent to Arsenal on the matter, one failed to arrive and the other was sent to the offices of Arsenal Ladies at the club's Hertfordshire training ground.

Arsene himself said they where opening a can of worms doing this when it happened, but for them to not follow through on any potential new cases in the future is a bit naughty of them... Unless its just English clubs which are being singled out ;)
 

megadave

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Apr 3, 2006
Messages
11,911
An agreement? As in a legally binding contract? Nope, didn't happen bud. A verbal agreement is generally not legally enforceable as such unless there are extenuating circumstances and/or corroborating witnesses.
Turns out Kakuta was 15 when we signed him, therefore too young for a professional contract and was on the same ‘non-solicitation’ agreement as Pogba.
 

cHodAX

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
19,742
Turns out Kakuta was 15 when we signed him, therefore too young for a professional contract and was on the same ‘non-solicitation’ agreement as Pogba.

Well then we need to wait for all the facts to be revealed then bud, FIFA seem convinced you did something wrong but as far as I am concerned if it turns out that the boy wasn't on a professional contract then he is fair game according to rules at the time of signing. If that does turn out to be the case then Chelsea are being made a scapegoat and I will vocally support them on the matter.
 

megadave

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Apr 3, 2006
Messages
11,911
It might not be the same type of contract, but either way he definately didnt have a proper professional contract since he was 15.
 

soze

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
12,508
Seen this on another forum, boy, Arsenal fans and Arsene might be pissed ;)



Arsene himself said they where opening a can of worms doing this when it happened, but for them to not follow through on any potential new cases in the future is a bit naughty of them... Unless its just English clubs which are being singled out ;)

Arsenal have seemingly submitted over 100 videos of professionals deceiving the ref and asking what Uefa say about it. But a few reports suggest a certain french twat pushed this though to forward a personal agenda and now he has done that it will be stopped.

I do think though that if nothing is done to other players who dive it is shocking.
 

Lethul

FH is my second home
Joined
Jan 25, 2004
Messages
8,433
Same :( Interesting game for Sweden tomorrow tho. To bad i miss it cause of work :(
 

Urgluf

Part of the furniture
Joined
Jun 27, 2004
Messages
2,900
get a life..

and belgium is going to get his ass kicked by spain :(
 

cHodAX

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
19,742

Talivar

Part of the furniture
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
2,057
Its all getting confusing atm, the way they talking is that both chelsea and united lured away minors from their clubs. As said before we will have to wait to see all the details
 

Ch3tan

I aer teh win!!
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
27,318
Yeah we both did, the sticking point here is that apparently we did it within the rules (full of flaws as they are) and you did not.

To be honest Chelsea should just be fined and Lens given a fair value for the player, and FIFA and UEFA should rewrite the rules to stop young players being exploited or fought over by clubs.
 

soze

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
12,508
I think Uefa were talking about stopping "free" transfers before the age of 18 or 21 I can't remember which i read. That could help stop some of this kind of problem and means the parent clubs get some money for their work.
 

Talivar

Part of the furniture
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
2,057
Thing is tho club united got player from is going through same motions as lens did to chelsea and claiming same things. Its united that say they did it all above board in same way chelsea deny doing any wrong and are going to appeal. The problem lies with the silly way the FIFA rule is worded, no proof is needed just need a youth to leave club early then join anoither club.
 

Ch3tan

I aer teh win!!
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
27,318
Not at all Talivar, we had a complain filed against us and it was not followed up as we did not actually break the rules.
 

Talivar

Part of the furniture
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
2,057
Well according to available evidence we didnt break rules either, its a presumption that fits the fifa rule, and its because of this ruling you also being looked at again. At a wild guess they appealing the decision to try get u punished in same way chelsea appealing to try get away with it. Imo in the end neither of us will end up being punished except for the chelsea fine.
 

Ch3tan

I aer teh win!!
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
27,318
Well according to available evidence we didnt break rules either, its a presumption that fits the fifa rule, and its because of this ruling you also being looked at again. At a wild guess they appealing the decision to try get u punished in same way chelsea appealing to try get away with it. Imo in the end neither of us will end up being punished except for the chelsea fine.


Once again, the fifa rule was not used in this judgement as far as I understand it. The DRC ruled against chelsea after considering the facts. They did not simply impose a penalty on you after two years without gathering any facts.
 

megadave

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Apr 3, 2006
Messages
11,911
Not at all Talivar, we had a complain filed against us and it was not followed up as we did not actually break the rules.
Wouldnt be so sure, according to La Havre, Pogba was on the same contract type as Kakuta and they have evidence of this. Guess we'll have to wait and see. Doubt anything will come of it.
 

Talivar

Part of the furniture
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
2,057
Ch3tan i know but i dont think you realise that le havre havent dropepd it and are appealing or trying again in light of recent chelsea decision. Its not about the decision made at time its about fact they trying again now and trying to point out their player was on same style contract as lens player.
 

megadave

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Apr 3, 2006
Messages
11,911
Also can you link to where it says La havre filled a case and were turned away? Statement from the club just says the intend to file the case but havent yet
 

Talivar

Part of the furniture
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
2,057
It all remidns me of a witch hunt where everyone will crawl out of woodwork now and try drag down as many teams as possible lol. Bit like when all the people come forward and try claim they had an affair with a celebrity. Well kinda like that lol
 

Genedril

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 29, 2003
Messages
1,077
It all remidns me of a witch hunt where everyone will crawl out of woodwork now and try drag down as many teams as possible lol. Bit like when all the people come forward and try claim they had an affair with a celebrity. Well kinda like that lol

I was poached from Man Utd to play for my local rugby club at an early age. I shall sue everyone!!!! Then I'll sell my story to the papers & make even more money.


.... Umm do I absolutely need to have sex in my story to sell it to the tabloids? I don't think I could stomach making up 'sex with Fergie etc' stories.

Back on football - I completely forgot to gloat about the victory over Derby last w/e. Probably 'cause I was in the pub.
 

Wonk

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
4,155
huarh, just got home! Niiiicklaaas Beeeendtneeeer :D
 

CorNokZ

Currently a stay at home dad
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
19,780
Shame we didn't get all 3pts, but I was still cheering when the ref made the final whistle
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom