Smackboy said:You cant do anything about PD, but the pet can be CCed or taken out by other means. Saying 75% intercepts = 75% meele damage reduction all the time is false.
When you exaggerate its just makes people more prone to try to shoot you down as a whiner in my experience. So lets stick to the facts obtained from the test where you showed that a pet intercepts roughly 3 out of 4 hits not that a SM is granted some super PD.
Puppet said:Well a mezzed/stunned pet still intercepts. So in that way it cant be taken out. If you put it on Passive and Follow there's only 3 ways to bypass the pet as tank-class (where PD is effective)
Smackboy said:Did you test that? I have never ever seen my pet intercept a hit while messed, and i have fought (and died) a hundreds times vs minstrels.
And as far as i know, the pet only intercepts while stunned when it intercepts a meelestun directed to the SM. Thou im not 100% sure that it dosent intercept under other circumstances while stunned.
Puppet said:It does, mezzed SM pet various times to only break mezz on it a combat-round later.
Azathrim said:Other casters spend RSP for Concentration to rewin the interruption battle between casters. Bainshees get it for free with their taunt spell. Other casters gets it for free as well with insta spells.
Necros have long ranged high damage spells. They have 90% melee absortion and the ability to cast in melee (while meleeing).
Mids/Hibs spends gold on AF charges. Albs gets it for free on their bot.
You see, we can keep trying to find silly comparisions on how to "convert" abilities into other realms. Does that make us anymore clever? No, not really.
Azathrim said:Archers have long range (actually, closest to being THE longest in the game. They are by far less fragile than their stealther brethern, the assassins.
Azathrim said:And you see, that's the entire point in this. An ability is overpowered if it cannot be countered (mind you, not limiting my personal definition of "overpowered" to just that) .
The SM pet can be countered.
Azathrim said:I fail to follow you. Yes, I can see the pet intercept rate is "high". The majority of tests and the official documentation says 50%.. A single test done by a player with an agenda says 70%+. If you can statisticly prove it's more than 50% you have an argument. Otherwise it's just a whine.
Azathrim said:Im no expert on testing. One can only assume the Mythic appointed person to test the class, The SM TL, knows how to test.
miracle-mm said:pet is uber ay but qq from hibs is zz.....
http://f.nu/~madition/daoc/smpetqq1.jpg
http://f.nu/~madition/daoc/smpetqq2.jpg
Ethild said:So a decent RR, decent SC bainshee, hitting you twice on a screenshot, is your counter argument for all these logs.
Go you!
I got hit by a sorc for 900 in one screeny, so I should get errr stealth! See the logic? No me neither.
blejs said:So why shouldnt us middie have some opted classes as the other realms have?
NN!
gwal said:...
ending up with:
a caster that doesnt get touched by meleers - the ONLY caster in the game that doesnt (as soon as he stays by his ml9 pet, like said earlier)
I fail to remember having talked about pre-nerf zerkers/savages in this thread. I used the necro as an example to show differences, still the same. That the necro pet system makes the class very hard to play due to the bugs is a matter for Mythic to fix. Something they actually have been working on in later patches.gwal said:yes, i think most know the bainshee ability is powerfull, and prolly overpowered, do smth about it then....
but how the hell can u actually compare to a silly bugged necro who is crap in rvr, or .... spec AF... jesus christ....
yes every realm has advantages and disadvantages, but some are too big to be balanced, or did u actually think the pre nerf zerker was just fine too cause albs had spec af or dirty tricks on mercs?.....
and ur the one who is comparing realms and not getting more clever, not us.
gwal said:dont be so stupid, u know what he means......
gwal said:ok, so lets get those pre nerf zerkers and savages back in game, u can counter them with bodyguard, so its no problemo
Uhm... can you actually read? My assumption was on the abilities of Vilna. Ofcourse, you struggle to find an argument to try to flame instead. Good work (sarcasm).gwal said:u assume, others test.. u loose, ok?....
u have a thread filled with ppl saying its too powerfull (including several SMs), yet ur ASSUMPTION is the right one - ofc it is....
gwal said:but if ur so sure, why dont u or one of ur friends go test it with puppethealer, and prove him and the rest of us wrong.
gwal said:i do perfectly well agree that the pet can be nuked down, which would be quite lovely to do, but thats still not fair, since u spend time nuking a pet, while he spends time nuking u. which i can only imagine any caster would find quite sucky.
gwal said:and before u go there, yes, a sorc ml9 pet has to be delt with too, but that is no different than the SM pet, as any SM can use his pet in the excact same way (tho there are differences in the abilities and dmg of the pets from class to class).
Azathrim said:Since Mythic apparently wanted to stress the "melee" oriented aspect of Midgard, they didn't give Spiritmasters ranged damage on their pets. Instead they got the intercept ability.
Puppet said:a) The intercept-rate is NOT capped at 50%
Puppet said:b) The trade-off of no bugged nuking pet ability to get this intercept-rate is silly.
Puppet said:So if some retard of Mythic said 'Midgard is the melee-realm, Hibernia is the caster-realm. Due to Mids having access to Warlocks with chambers, we from now on give all casters of the caster-realm, Hibernia, access to a passive 50% chance to outright bounce off offensive spells on the caster.
Puppet said:They would give that to Hibernia (hey its fair! Mythic said they would do it) but instead accidentally all casters get a 75% chance to shake-off spell-effects.
Would you argue this would be overpowered AND not living up the description Mythic did? Probably. And Im doing the same. With me loads of others gave arguments why it is not right to get such an ability AND it's not 50% as said, but its 75%.
Azathrim said:I don't know excactly how the intercept chance is calculated. Nor do you. You created a test that is open for a great deal of critizism on it's execution....
My suggestion stands: Talk with Vilna, ask how to test things properly.
Azathrim said:A bit like the bainshee ablative, although not as effecient?
Azathrim said:You say it's 75%.. I say all accepted tests so far claims 50%. Once again, go do some proper tests with an acknowledged tester, then come back
we all know its OP and we all admitt it, But i wanna se a test of banshee dmgBelomar said:On a more serious note, I actually think it's a bit laughable to see the reactions of some of my fellow Mids (not everyone, but some) who immediately get a knee-jerk reaction when someone mentions this issue. Everyone knows SM pet intercept is over the top. Just own up and admit it.
Konstantin said:we all know its OP and we all admitt it, But i wanna se a test of banshee dmg
Puppet said:Im curious where those accepted tests are and in what way they differ from my test.
Puppet said:Or are accepted tests tests which show its 50% even tho the sample-size is often too small to make even a claim about it ?
Puppet said:Anyhow, care to explain how suddenly on the 600 swings I did with the berserker it came out around 74% ?
If you say ML9'ing the pet is an issue which might skew the result, well you might be right. However mentioned TL's say it has no impact on the intercept-rate. Furthermore a ML9 pet isnt exactly uncommon in RvR either.
Puppet said:You also claim I got an agenda, and I agree with that partially. I dont have an agenda on the %, I do have an agenda with the result. Obviously.
However what guarantees me the mentioned TL's doesnt have an agenda (he even plays a SM for crying out loud!) and isnt it ironic that TL's arent exactly the persons which the community has a huge believe in. If I remember correctly a now retired TL asked ME for some information about artifacts because they lacked the tools to get those on their (closed) testserver where I, as simple E&E had access to them.
If TL's lack simple tools like that, I dont see how you can put such great belief in them. Then again, you got an agenda, and its not exactly too hidden: Bashing me and make sure Midgard's overpowered abilities dont get touched.
Belomar said:On a more serious note, I actually think it's a bit laughable to see the reactions of some of my fellow Mids (not everyone, but some) who immediately get a knee-jerk reaction when someone mentions this issue. Everyone knows SM pet intercept is over the top. Just own up and admit it.
well seenm rr3 banshe 3 shot rr5 troll zerker whit 48% resists ^^Dorin said:548(-89) - 26% resist
484(-153) - 26% resist + yellow buff
385(-240) - 26% resist + red buff
rr4l8 bainshee 9% dmg, 10% resist pierce, 300 int, mom2
iirc
got news for you m8 Warden need to be deleted from the game ore just give grappel timer to make them useless well all pry wardens would be useless then GAH!Tuorin said:Nice post.
Not everyone qqs and nice to see that we have some discerning posters from all realms!!!
Easy fix imo is make warden have the absorb/af of the SM pet, then see how that goes with zerkers hitting for 65.