Vladamir
FH is my second home
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2003
- Messages
- 15,105
it is a unfair advantage by definition...
why is that so hard to comprehend?
if you have a buffbot, you have a significant edge over someone who cant afford/cant run a second account.
Last i checked it wasn't a pre-requisite to buy 2 accounts to play daoc
Just because alot of people have buffbots doesnt make it any less of a unfair advantage over people who cant afford/run a second account. The fact of the matter is the majority of the playerbase dont have one, meaning it is not the norm
why would they be? you can get buffs in cl lines now, and ae buffs ableit(sp?)timered will still come up as "x has lost x", when they die.censi said:you dont have to have a buffbot to get buffs mate. The fact that about 1/3 of players have them and you can buff 3 people on one bot should give you a rough idea of how many people are actually running without them!!
Or your seeing something I aint? because I cant remeber the last unbuffed opponent I fought in like years. Its a non-point. Like I say go with the "I pay my subs meight" arguement instead chronic.
censi said:like I say everyone has buffs now. Its not an unfair advantage. If you have any aspirations of playing this game solo you need buffs. Thats just a fact of daoc (right or wrong). Again your missing my point, I cba to keep spelling it out. next time just reply "he pays his subs meight" or summin.
Vladamir said:No they don't?![]()
Kagato said:Personally I think buff shears should not remove a buff but make it invalid for 1 minute/longer. Just make it red out like your immunity time, so your buffs will be ineffective until the duration has worn off and you cannot be rebuffed either as technically you still have the effect its just waiting to come back.
This way it will still offer the same effect, still stack with debuffs, still be good in FG rvr if not stronger because you cannot be rebuffed until the timer is up but it wont ruin the winners game or the soloers life because after the battle the buff will eventually come back again.
actually mate you underestimate its effect,Vladamir said:No fun when i mocshear zergers then![]()
Chronictank said:actually mate you underestimate its effect,
timered buff shearing means you can shear more than once, if it worked like a champion debuff something like a s/c shear will take away their con and they dont get the health back soon as they are no longer "sheared" do it again :X
you could shear someone to death!
the only problem would be that all the whine would result in immunity timers, making shears pretty useless after the first cast going back to pre-shear shammys for example which quite frankly were boring to play
It would make it really ridicolous(sp?) in fg fights. Wouldn't be so bad though if you were able to rebuff it during that 1 minute timer.Kagato said:Personally I think buff shears should not remove a buff but make it invalid for 1 minute/longer. Just make it red out like your immunity time, so your buffs will be ineffective until the duration has worn off and you cannot be rebuffed either as technically you still have the effect its just waiting to come back.
This way it will still offer the same effect, still stack with debuffs, still be good in FG rvr if not stronger because you cannot be rebuffed until the timer is up but it wont ruin the winners game or the soloers life because after the battle the buff will eventually come back again.
No. It's not the same. It's totally different. The point is that clerics who are buff specced can rebuff in combat. It's part of your spec. It's not like there are loads of soloing de-buffers anyhow. You all whine too much, seriously.Kagato said:Personally I think buff shears should not remove a buff but make it invalid for 1 minute/longer. Just make it red out like your immunity time, so your buffs will be ineffective until the duration has worn off and you cannot be rebuffed either as technically you still have the effect its just waiting to come back.
censi said:yer asha ive said a couple of times your arguement is valid. but also Ive said several times that im talking about players that have no intenstion of fighting back just buff sheer and sit etc (after a couple of /laughs).
Kagato said:Personally I think buff shears should not remove a buff but make it invalid for 1 minute/longer. Just make it red out like your immunity time, so your buffs will be ineffective until the duration has worn off and you cannot be rebuffed either as technically you still have the effect its just waiting to come back.
This way it will still offer the same effect, still stack with debuffs, still be good in FG rvr if not stronger because you cannot be rebuffed until the timer is up but it wont ruin the winners game or the soloers life because after the battle the buff will eventually come back again.
ebenezer said:I think this is a really good idea tbh![]()
Asha said:No. It's not the same. It's totally different. The point is that clerics who are buff specced can rebuff in combat. It's part of your spec. It's not like there are loads of soloing de-buffers anyhow. You all whine too much, seriously.
Kagato said:Of cause its the same, if your buff spec'd your spec'd for shearing too and your advantage and utility here comes from being able to shear the enemies buffs.
The only differance with my idea is that you will be even more powerful in FG because they cannot get their buffs back until the timers up.
However the buffs are not completely lost because they timer will even eventually and they will become active again, every body wins.
You just have your personal vendetta against BB's and wont accept anything else.
Kagato said:You just have your personal vendetta against BB's and wont accept anything else.
Asha said:Yes I have a vendetta against bbots![]()
Funny that I've been using them alot longer than you and iirc you used to complain about them aswell. I don't have a problem with bbots. I have a problem with everyone constantly whining about everything. :touch:
What you're suggesting doesn't work. Buff shearing adds another dimension to the game for buffing classes. This includes rebuffing mid-fight. That makes the buffer important to have in the group. It makes people want to group them and since it's very difficult for them to solo, this is important.
I don't think a class should be nerfed to suit those who choose to run solo with the bonuses of a bot. I think people should be encouranged to play with "group classes" not given more ways to avoid them. I think if you want your buffbot buffs instead of playing with a real player, then you should have the consequence of running back to your bot if you get sheared by a real player. If that constitutes a vendetta, whoop-de-do-da.
Kagato said:And my suggestion is not a nerf, it actually makes buff shearing more powerful for the actual fight, therefore making the buff-shear classes more important. However theres also no longterm penalty for the sheared player after the fight is over.
Vodkafairy said:the thing you suggest is to take away skill from fights, yeah, good plan!
...or maybe not![]()
Kagato said:errrrr...wtf?
![]()
Kagato said:Your wrong, I never complained about buffs, I said I enjoyed killing people who were buffed before I had a BB myself, as it felt good, just like killing higher level players before I was 50. Back then this was possible before perfect templates and spellcrafting.
TBH i find it hilarious - especially if youre goign to be really harsh and slap a stun on them from the minstrel while they get totally sheared by the cleric, then mezzed by the sorc, then we run off again.Andrilyn said:So basically it comes down to Censi attacking a solo support character, killing it but losing a few buffs in the process, therefor shearing is lame but attacking a solo support character which can't fight back other than MoC1 shearing is "cool".
Puppet said:Getting slightly annoyed by the goold-old 'You're a stealther you can pick your fights so its fine!'. Probably the most stupid argument ever.