Mabs
J Peasemould Gruntfuttock
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 6,869
Well, it sure will be interesting to see what that black box has to say. Here's hoping that the pilot (or anyone else on the plane) didn't deliberately cause it.. The airports are paranoid enough as it is.
Somebody will. Malaysia might give up but China and Australia will find it if somebody else doesn't. It took them two years to find and recover the black box from Air France 447.
Somebody will. Malaysia might give up but China and Australia will find it if somebody else doesn't. It took them two years to find and recover the black box from Air France 447.
Latest industry rumour on this aircraft:
This was an elaborate robbery. There was undisclosed container on-board with valuable items. One of flight crew stepped out and the other intentionally decompressed the aircraft and then flew the aircraft until parachuting out.
The inmarsat story over the past few days stating that Lat/long are not transmitted is completely wrong, they knew exactly where it was (flight track). The security services instructed them not to say anything to the press.
Latest industry rumour on this aircraft:
This was an elaborate robbery. There was undisclosed container on-board with valuable items. One of flight crew stepped out and the other intentionally decompressed the aircraft and then flew the aircraft until parachuting out.
The inmarsat story over the past few days stating that Lat/long are not transmitted is completely wrong, they knew exactly where it was (flight track). The security services instructed them not to say anything to the press.
tbh. yesterday over coffees I had a discussion on the posibility of it being stolen by some oddball country.
It would be hard enough to find them now because of the limitations to detect the ping especially if they are very deep and that is even if they can narrow down the search area, then those pings will stop all together in the next 15 or so days and fall silent after which the amount of luck required to find them will be absolutely massive.
I'm no expert but isn't it possible to detect large objects like parts of a fuselage or wing with sonar?
You don't have to rag on every single link someone posts to the BBC you know, we all know they're a bit shite."A BBC Guide"
So take with a rather large pinch of salt.
It could well be but it does make sense of why it changed course. Also why Imarsat/ARINC did not divulge that they knew exactly where it was and had the tracking information. Basically, they were looking for the people responsible and did not want news agencies getting the information.Some form of that story has been doing the rounds in slightly different versions since the early days of it going missing, personally I just think it a load of old tosh.
They state in the article that it was connected (Sat), therefore had position. Even periodically connected would give position data.So..youre saying they either has good location or non at all.
The aircrafts INS gives position data to the Antenna so it knows where to point (parabolic mechanical) or electrically steer the beam. That same INS data is transmitted as part of the modem data along with signal power, SNR....But inmarsat is 36,000km up, it cant be that accurate simply by pointing.