SPAM random annoying things

[Moriath]

None of the local supermarkets have any Haywards Sweet Onions.

Fucking sort it out.

Haywards are the best but i prefer the normal. The sweet i had as a kid.

 

[soze]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFgunWhKWo4


I hate videos like this. I really end up not caring who is right and wrong. The fact this guy just went there looking for the argument boils my piss. I do not care that he says he was trying to film the crash for the news you could hear the joy in his voice when he was asked to stop filming.

 

[Billargh]

What a smug fucking scrotum that guy is.

 

[Tom]

I have discovered that Haywards have rebranded their onions and that there is now no such thing as Sweet Onions. They're probably called something else.

I shall buy the "new" onions and if they taste different, will write a strongly-scented letter of complaint about the lack of onion-related goodness in my cupboard.

 

[Scouse]

he was asked to stop filming.

By a bunch of cunts.

He is a cunt, but they shouldn't have asked him to stop.

 

[soze]

By a bunch of cunts.

He is a cunt, but they shouldn't have asked him to stop.

They should not have told him to stop. Asking him to stop is fine.

 

[Gwadien]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFgunWhKWo4


I hate videos like this. I really end up not caring who is right and wrong. The fact this guy just went there looking for the argument boils my piss. I do not care that he says he was trying to film the crash for the news you could hear the joy in his voice when he was asked to stop filming.

Copper did well, until the point where they tried to make friends, he should have just said 'Look, I've told you the problem, now fuck off'

 

[Scouse]

They should not have told him to stop. Asking him to stop is fine.

And leaving him alone to do what he is fully legally able to do when he says "no" should be their standard response.

They shouldn't have stood about talking to him if they had anything else better to do. They should have made their point and left it at that. He turned the camera on himself out of respect for them.

The fact is if the authorities hadn't kicked off in the first place there wouldn't have been an argument - and his whole raison d'etre is showing the authorities kicking off where they shouldn't be - and that's an important public service.

Your piss should be boiling that the authorities kick off in the first place. Your anger is incorrectly directed.

 

[Gwadien]

And leaving him alone to do what he is fully legally able to do when he says "no" should be their standard response.

They shouldn't have stood about talking to him if they had anything else better to do. They should have made their point and left it at that. He turned the camera on himself out of respect for them.

The fact is if the authorities hadn't kicked off in the first place there wouldn't have been an argument - and his whole raison d'etre is showing the authorities kicking off where they shouldn't be - and that's an important public service.

Your piss should be boiling that the authorities kick off in the first place. Your anger is incorrectly directed.

No-one kicked off though.

The PSO was given a completely justified job, and a guy who's come around to intentionally provoke officers was met with the way that they should react.

 

[soze]

And leaving him alone to do what he is fully legally able to do when he says "no" should be their standard response.

They shouldn't have stood about talking to him if they had anything else better to do. They should have made their point and left it at that. He turned the camera on himself out of respect for them.

The fact is if the authorities hadn't kicked off in the first place there wouldn't have been an argument - and his whole raison d'etre is showing the authorities kicking off where they shouldn't be - and that's an important public service.

Your piss should be boiling that the authorities kick off in the first place. Your anger is incorrectly directed.

Like I said you can tell he was spoiling for that fight so no my anger is directed where it needs to be. The PCSO was an idiot she should never have told him he could not film, she should have just asked him not too. But from that moment on he was an antagonistic prick.

 

[soze]

Copper did well, until the point where they tried to make friends, he should have just said 'Look, I've told you the problem, now fuck off'

Yeah it is a shame he did not just say "I am going to ask you to show some compassion and stop filming one more time if you are not going to show any I am going to stop wasting my time" and just walked away.

 

[Scouse]

The PSO was given a completely justified job, and a guy who's come around to intentionally provoke officers was met with the way that they should react.

They should have asked him if he minded not filming, then when he said "yes" they should have said fair enough.

That's how it should have gone down.

 

[soze]

They should have asked him if he minded not filming, then when he said "yes" they should have said fair enough.

That's how it should have gone down.

But listen to the guy no way he would have left it at that. He would still have gone into the "how dare you ask me to stop filming this is a free country not Nazi Germany" he was spoiling for the fight. Because he is a cunt.

 

[Gwadien]

They should have asked him if he minded not filming, then when he said "yes" they should have said fair enough.

That's how it should have gone down.

But the Police had a legal precedent to stop him from filming, as explained when the film crews rocked up.

 

[Raven]

People who drive at 20 in a 30.

 

[~Yuckfou~]

People who drive at 20 in a 20.

 

[soze]

People who drive at 20 in a 30.

Only beaten for me by the 40 fuckers. The infuriating cunts that do 40 no matter the speed limit. 15mph school zone I better do 40. 60mph zone I better do 40. 30mph oh no I better do 40. Cunts.

Oh but as a bit of a cunt myself if you sit up my arse in a 30 I will slow to 20 and sub 10 for every corner and roundabout. If you back off a bit I will go right back to 30.

 

[Scouse]

Oh but as a bit of a cunt myself if you sit up my arse in a 30 I will slow to 20 and sub 10 for every corner and roundabout. If you back off a bit I will go right back to 30.

That's both dangerous and selfish. Don't lower yourself to their level - concentrate on your own driving rather than how you percieve other people's.

 

[soze]

That's both dangerous and selfish. Don't lower yourself to their level - concentrate on your own driving rather than how you percieve other people's.

It is actually in the highway code isn't it? If someone is right up your arse you increase the gap in front of you. So if they hit you don't hit the car in front?

 

[Scouse]

It is actually in the highway code isn't it? If someone is right up your arse you increase the gap in front of you. So if they hit you don't hit the car in front?

That's not what you were talking about - you're talking about deliberately slowing down to frustrate tailgaters - which is dangerous.

If you're not already driving with an appropriate gap when the tailgater catches up with you then you're doing two things wrong.

 

[Moriath]

That's not what you were talking about - you're talking about deliberately slowing down to frustrate tailgaters - which is dangerous.

If you're not already driving with an appropriate gap when the tailgater catches up with you then you're doing two things wrong.

The gap was appropriate before the guy behind you got to close. Now you need to extend that gap because you cant break so hard as when there wasnt an arse on yr arse. So you need to slow to extend the gap. Imo

 

[Scouse]

If you have to break hard to ensure that you don't hit the car in front then the gap is already inappropriate.

 

[Raven]

That's not what you were talking about - you're talking about deliberately slowing down to frustrate tailgaters - which is dangerous.

If you're not already driving with an appropriate gap when the tailgater catches up with you then you're doing two things wrong.

Actually it isn't, steadily slowing the situation down would result in a less dangerous crash if one ever happened. If the idiot behind chooses to carry out a dangerous maneuver by overtaking at a stupid time then that is up to them. It's no different from cyclists chugging along at 10 miles an hour (one must always treat them as a car as far as space is involved) it isn't the cyclists fault if someone roars past them and crashes.

If they want to hang a foot off the bumper then the appropriate speed is far less, if they are too stupid to understand that then who cares.

 

[Scouse]

If you're driving correctly the possibility of you crashing into the car in front of you should be approaching nil anyway. If you deliberately slow down unnecessarily because of tailgaters you're increasing the likelihood of them acting like an arse and causing a crash.

If it was necessary for you to make a bigger gap because of tailgaters then you were driving incorrectly anyway.

 

[Raven]

mmm, but when driving you should also consider how others are driving and how that may effect you. Having someone right up your arse and then having to make an emergency stop increases the chance that you might be in an accident, slowing down to a speed appropriate to their distance is the right thing to do.

The official (but admittedly out of date) stopping distance at 30mph is 44 feet, if a car is 1 foot behind you then there is no way on earth they would react in time to stop if a kid stepped out in front of you (44 feet away or whatever). So sensibly, slowing it all down is the only real option.

Obviously not slamming the brakes on...

Although seeing the cunting sales rep's face when you do is pretty hilarious.

 

[Scouse]

The safe thing to do is to drive to the conditions in front of you - you cannot control how close some cunt behind you gets - but you can influence your need to make emergency stops by driving appropriately.

Slowing down in the face of a tailgater, unless you're pulling over to let him past, is a self-defeating action safety-wise. It increases the likelihood of an accident and creates long tailbacks if the situation continues - which again increases the likelihood of accidents.

 

[soze]

If you're driving correctly the possibility of you crashing into the car in front of you should be approaching nil anyway. If you deliberately slow down unnecessarily because of tailgaters you're increasing the likelihood of them acting like an arse and causing a crash.

If it was necessary for you to make a bigger gap because of tailgaters then you were driving incorrectly anyway.

That is not true. If I have the right gap and the car behind has the right gap then my chance of hitting the car in front should be nil. But if the car behind me has no gap he will hit me at almost full speed meaning the gap between me and the car in front needs to be a lot more than normal to allow for him pushing me. And seeing as it does not matter if you got hit or not if you hit someone up the arse it is your fault you need to increase the gap to protect yourself.

I do increase the gap by a lot when some idiot is up my arse especially if it is a van or something. But slowing to 20 is just me driving like a cunt. But increasing the gap is something you need to do.

 

[Scouse]

if the car behind me has no gap he will hit me at almost full speed

IF you have to emergency break, which you shouldn't have to be doing anyway. I've certainly not had to do it so far this year, for example.

The chances of an accident increase under other conditions...


Edit: Under normal driving conditions the gap to the car in front of you should allow for gentle breaking - so are you worried that a tailgater will hit you under your normal gentle breaking? If that's the case you're either a scared driver (which you admit) or aren't leaving enough gap in the first place.

 

[soze]

IF you have to emergency break, which you shouldn't have to be doing anyway. I've certainly not had to do it so far this year, for example.

The chances of an accident increase under other conditions...

That is an annoying technicality that makes it seem like you win but you have not won.

 

[Scouse]

That is an annoying technicality

No, it's just a realistic fact of driving.

If you're driving correctly then you shouldn't need to slow down to increase the gap on the car in front...