it's that cycle snobbery...I' m a proper cyclist, so I'll risk my life as I see fit.
Again?! It only feels like weeks ago you were bragging about seeing them again.Just went to see Rival Sons.
Quite far at the back because late.
People talking all the way through it.
Cunts.
I've been busy!Again?! It only feels like weeks ago you were bragging about seeing them again.
I've only got three coming upI've been busy!
Rival Sons
Manchester Orchestra
Karnivool
Placebo
I've only got three coming up
Retox in Leeds on Friday (assuming I can get the day off).
Arcane Roots in Newcastle in May.
Fall of Troy at ALL THE DATES.
You are allowed just not in this thread you Mr strawbridge monkey.Not being allowed to post pictures of girls.
Bollocks to that.
So, here's a picture of a girl licking a hammer
Not being allowed to post pictures of girls.
Bollocks to that.
Not being allowed to post pictures of girls.
Bollocks to that.
So, here's a picture of a girl licking a hammer
I'm surprised you're looking forward to it after last time.It's bloody derby day too!
Hah I absolutely hate derby day. Even back in the days when we had a chance of winning I hated it.I'm surprised you're looking forward to it after last time.
Good result today lolHah I absolutely hate derby day. Even back in the days when we had a chance of winning I hated it.
I'd like to agree with you but again, I don't understand a word you just said.trying to code up a specialisation via an interface rather than an abstract class. I am such an idiot -.-
programming gubbins my good man. I was trying to find a way to associate two implementations with their parent concept in a specialist rather than a generalist manner.
Think of it like so (maaaaaybe, I'm a bit vague atm): nails and screws are both implementations of an idea for connecting things to each other. you can have different kinds of nails and screws, but there is generally (there you go) a specific way to use them, and they're very good at doing a given job. Now consider a wall-anchor. This is also a thing that can connect other things to each other, and can in some ways be dealt with like a nail or a screw, but in other ways can not. It has to be implemented in a specialist manner or it won't work properly. In programming there often are special ways to describe things, e.g. I need a connector of the type "nail", and I am going to put it in to a wall with a tool of the type "hammer", etc etc etc.
programming gubbins my good man. I was trying to find a way to associate two implementations with their parent concept in a specialist rather than a generalist manner.
Think of it like so (maaaaaybe, I'm a bit vague atm): nails and screws are both implementations of an idea for connecting things to each other. you can have different kinds of nails and screws, but there is generally (there you go) a specific way to use them, and they're very good at doing a given job. Now consider a wall-anchor. This is also a thing that can connect other things to each other, and can in some ways be dealt with like a nail or a screw, but in other ways can not. It has to be implemented in a specialist manner or it won't work properly. In programming there often are special ways to describe things, e.g. I need a connector of the type "nail", and I am going to put it in to a wall with a tool of the type "hammer", etc etc etc.
Just sprayed some stuff in between my toes fro a little bit of athletes foot. It's stinging like fuck, is that right?
I thought it was supposed to cool the area and stop the itching
programming gubbins my good man. I was trying to find a way to associate two implementations with their parent concept in a specialist rather than a generalist manner..