Predictions - Football related

Calaen

I am a massive cock who isn't firing atm!
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,538
Arsenal played well, and tbh who cares if they were kicking the ball as far up the pitch as they could. It got them the win, Arsenal were not as silky as usual but they got the job done.

Its a shame they cant turn up against the smaller clubs because it wouldnt just be a two horse race then.
 

Azurus

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
1,263
Bullshit if all teams were on top form Arsenal would win because we have the most talented starting 11 (not squad).

Ronaldo didn't play badly he was just marked out the game cos Clichey and Eboue played a blinder.

Goalkeeper=Lehman
RB=Eboue
CB=Gallas
CB=Toure
LB=Clichey

CM=Gilberto
CM=Fabregas
LM=Rosicky
RM=Hleb

Henry+Van Persie up front.

Imo best starting 11 in the premiership.
 

soze

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
12,508
Calaen said:
Arsenal played well, and tbh who cares if they were kicking the ball as far up the pitch as they could. It got them the win, Arsenal were not as silky as usual but they got the job done.

Its a shame they cant turn up against the smaller clubs because it wouldnt just be a two horse race then.
I think with Man U effectivly playing a 5 man midfield we did not have much hope of passing through them regularly.
 

Vladamir

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 28, 2003
Messages
15,105
Azurus said:
Bullshit if all teams were on top form Arsenal would win because we have the most talented starting 11 (not squad).

Ronaldo didn't play badly he was just marked out the game cos Clichey and Eboue played a blinder.

Goalkeeper=Lehman
RB=Eboue
CB=Gallas
CB=Toure
LB=Clichey

CM=Gilberto
CM=Fabregas
LM=Rosicky
RM=Hleb

Henry+Van Persie up front.

Imo best starting 11 in the premiership.

Vs

Goalie = Cech
RB = Geremi
CB = Carvalho
CB = JT
LB = A.Cole

DMF= Makalele
CMF = Essien
CMF = Lampard

LWF = Robben
RWF = J.Cole
CF = Drogba

Bear in mind the last two years near enough that team was unstoppable :p
 

Azurus

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
1,263
Against a team like that you are relying on your wingers to put crosses in. Against Clichey and Eboue as shown yesterday this would be difficult. If you went through the middle Gilberto would be tough to get past and even Fabregas puts alot of tackles it. Out of all the midfielders from both squads Fabregas is the most comfortable on the ball with the best distribution imo, and if he can link with Henry and Van Persie no defence will be able to stop that.
 

soze

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
12,508
Vladamir said:
Vs

Goalie = Cech
RB = Geremi
CB = Carvalho
CB = JT
LB = A.Cole

DMF= Makalele
CMF = Essien
CMF = Lampard

LWF = Robben
RWF = J.Cole
CF = Drogba

Bear in mind the last two years near enough that team was unstoppable :p
3 players missing and you play like a sack of shite dose not make your squad look all that good dose it :p
 

cHodAX

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
19,742
Azurus said:
Against a team like that you are relying on your wingers to put crosses in. Against Clichey and Eboue as shown yesterday this would be difficult. If you went through the middle Gilberto would be tough to get past and even Fabregas puts alot of tackles it. Out of all the midfielders from both squads Fabregas is the most comfortable on the ball with the best distribution imo, and if he can link with Henry and Van Persie no defence will be able to stop that.


You are talking bollocks, Chelsea won 2 titles back to back with that squad and they did it beating Arsenal on a number of occasions. The fact is that Arsenal got no where near them in the last 2 years and I honestly think they will be behind Chelsea again this season regardless. Until Arsenal can learn to cope with the more physical sides in the premier league they will continue to be also-rans because they have dropped far too many points this season against lesser sides. Arsenal have a very talented first 11 but they are missing what it takes to be champions right now and that is toughness, if they can change that they will be formidible and really worthy challengers for the league title.
 

cHodAX

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
19,742
soze said:
3 players missing and you play like a sack of shite dose not make your squad look all that good dose it :p

And the great Arsenal side without Veira, Bergkamp and Henry would have fared any better? ;) :p :D
 

Vladamir

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 28, 2003
Messages
15,105
soze said:
3 players missing and you play like a sack of shite dose not make your squad look all that good dose it :p

3?

Makalele, JT, Carvalho & J.Cole, and i suppose to an extent you could say Robben based on saturdays performance, does not equal 3 players :p

Hell why don't we throw in Essien as well as we've been missing his presence in the midfield with the ever underperforming Ballack not pulling his weight.

Once we get our big players back, you'll see Chelsea start to shine. Fact is even without our top starting 11, Chelsea can still grind out a win. Can't remember what the state of your squad was, but you got served pretty badly by Bolton didn't you? :p

As Cho said until Arsenal learn to cope with the physical nature of the premiership and adapt their playstyle to it (don't let this detract from it though, i'll admit Arsenal do play some very attractive football & rightly sos), then you'll go to the Reebok and struggle to get a result, as well as similar teams who come at you like that.
 

Azurus

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
1,263
cHodAX said:
You are talking bollocks, Chelsea won 2 titles back to back with that squad and they did it beating Arsenal on a number of occasions. The fact is that Arsenal got no where near them in the last 2 years and I honestly think they will be behind Chelsea again this season regardless. Until Arsenal can learn to cope with the more physical sides in the premier league they will continue to be also-rans because they have dropped far too many points this season against lesser sides. Arsenal have a very talented first 11 but they are missing what it takes to be champions right now and that is toughness, if they can change that they will be formidible and really worthy challengers for the league title.

Your talking bollocks, we aren't talking consitency or being able to cope with physical sides, we are saying best on their day. We didn't have players like Fabregas or Van Persie anywhere near the age where they could be their best in those seasons.
 

Marc

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 28, 2003
Messages
11,094
Jesus christ. If Arsenal were as good as their one eyed blinkered fans suggest they would be top of the league. As it stands they are fighting for 3rd place. League table doesnt lie.
 

Azurus

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
1,263
Um Marc we are talking about best on their day and the fact we have beaten Man Utd twice this season, the 'best' team as they are top can't be ignored.
 

soze

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
12,508
cHodAX said:
You are talking bollocks, Chelsea won 2 titles back to back with that squad and they did it beating Arsenal on a number of occasions. The fact is that Arsenal got no where near them in the last 2 years and I honestly think they will be behind Chelsea again this season regardless. Until Arsenal can learn to cope with the more physical sides in the premier league they will continue to be also-rans because they have dropped far too many points this season against lesser sides. Arsenal have a very talented first 11 but they are missing what it takes to be champions right now and that is toughness, if they can change that they will be formidible and really worthy challengers for the league title.
After the away win at blackburn Cesc did say they have spent alot of time working of training for the tougher games and it worked against a physical side when we only had 10 men so Saturday vs Bolton will be a test if we have that part of the game sorted. But it looked good vs Blackburn.

cHodAX said:
And the great Arsenal side without Veira, Bergkamp and Henry would have fared any better?
Shut up :)

Vladamir said:
3?

Makalele, JT, Carvalho & J.Cole, and i suppose to an extent you could say Robben based on saturdays performance, does not equal 3 players :p

Hell why don't we throw in Essien as well as we've been missing his presence in the midfield with the ever underperforming Ballack not pulling his weight.

Once we get our big players back, you'll see Chelsea start to shine. Fact is even without our top starting 11, Chelsea can still grind out a win. Can't remember what the state of your squad was, but you got served pretty badly by Bolton didn't you?

As Cho said until Arsenal learn to cope with the physical nature of the premiership and adapt their playstyle to it (don't let this detract from it though, i'll admit Arsenal do play some very attractive football & rightly sos), then you'll go to the Reebok and struggle to get a result, as well as similar teams who come at you like that.

Ok i will give you 4 players out ok ;)

And go easy im not saying any different i know Arsenals problems come from ginding out wins and consistancy but we are a young squad so the future could be bright.

Marc said:
Jesus christ. If Arsenal were as good as their one eyed blinkered fans suggest they would be top of the league. As it stands they are fighting for 3rd place. League table doesnt lie.

Do not gerealise toffe im not saying we have the best squad!
 

Marc

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 28, 2003
Messages
11,094
Azurus said:
Bullshit if all teams were on top form Arsenal would win because we have the most talented starting 11 (not squad)..


Lehman vs Cech = Cech
Eboue Vs Geremi = Tied
Gallas vs Terry = Terry
Toure vs Carvalho = Toure
Cole vs CLichy = Cole

Gilberto vs Essien = Essien
Fabregas vs Lampard = Lampard
Rosisky vs Joe COle = Joe Cole
Hleb vs Robben = Robben

Henry vs Schev = Henry
Van Persie vs Drogba = Drogba
 

Azurus

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
1,263
Imo Fabreagas>Lampard and Clichey>Cole.

Anyway you can't look at it player for player you have to do it in pairs really.

E.g. Gallas+Toure=Carvalho+Terry.

Imo we have equal defence and i would take Fabregas and Gilberto over Lampard/Essien anyday.

We are also stronger up front. Henry+Van Persie>Drogba+Shevchenko.

Chelsea are stronger on the wings and in goal so the teams are fairly equal but Arsenal are *slightly* ahead.
 

Vladamir

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 28, 2003
Messages
15,105
Azurus said:
Imo Fabreagas>Lampard and Clichey>Cole.

Anyway you can't look at it player for player you have to do it in pairs really.

E.g. Gallas+Toure=Carvalho+Terry.

Imo we have equal defence and i would take Fabregas and Gilberto over Lampard/Essien anyday.

We are also stronger up front. Henry+Van Persie>Drogba+Shevchenko.

Chelsea are stronger on the wings and in goal so the teams are fairly equal but Arsenal are *slightly* ahead.

That why we're above you in the table then? :p
 

soze

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
12,508
Vladamir said:
That why we're above you in the table then? :p
No your above us because we have not mastered the boring grinding out a result style of football you became famous for ;)
 

Fatload BoysDoCry

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Jun 18, 2006
Messages
759
Azurus said:
Um Marc we are talking about best on their day and the fact we have beaten Man Utd twice this season, the 'best' team as they are top can't be ignored.

Iirc Bolton beat Chelsea both times in their championship season, Bolton the best team on their day now?

The views of some are funny, the league table doesn't lie, Arsenal are a good team don't get me wrong, but its only losses by Bolton and Portsmouth this month that have allowed them to crawl into 4th.
 

Azurus

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
1,263
Urgh the old whose higher in the table argument, always the Chelsea/man Utd fan way. You have a better squad as you can throw shit loads of money at it=you are higher? Not hard to understand IMO. We are talking about first 11, which means jack shit in the premiership, its all about the squad in such a physical league with so many injuries. You have a better squad as i have said.
 

Marc

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 28, 2003
Messages
11,094
Azurus said:
Imo Fabreagas>Lampard and Clichey>Cole.

Anyway you can't look at it player for player you have to do it in pairs really.

E.g. Gallas+Toure=Carvalho+Terry.

Imo we have equal defence and i would take Fabregas and Gilberto over Lampard/Essien anyday.

We are also stronger up front. Henry+Van Persie>Drogba+Shevchenko.

Chelsea are stronger on the wings and in goal so the teams are fairly equal but Arsenal are *slightly* ahead.

Fabregas and Gilberto over Essien and Lampard. Are you for real???? Obviously its your opinion, but still. I cant quite see how. Essien is 10 times the holding player Gilberto is and Fabregas still has some way to go to be as good as Lampard. There is no doubt Fabregas has the potential, but at the moment hes not the Player Lampard is.
 

Vladamir

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 28, 2003
Messages
15,105
Fatload BoysDoCry said:
Iirc Bolton beat Chelsea both times in their championship season, Bolton the best team on their day now?

The views of some are funny, the league table doesn't lie, Arsenal are a good team don't get me wrong, but its only losses by Bolton and Portsmouth this month that have allowed them to crawl into 4th.

Erm what? :p

Chelsea effectively won the title at the Reebok twice the last two years, and he won there this year too :p
 

cHodAX

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
19,742
Azurus said:
Your talking bollocks, we aren't talking consitency or being able to cope with physical sides, we are saying best on their day. We didn't have players like Fabregas or Van Persie anywhere near the age where they could be their best in those seasons.

Oh I am sorry, aren't you 4th in the league with those same players you are extoling the virtues of? They are as good as they have ever been and yet you are 4th, the points total doesn't lie, you aren't a better side than your postition because you can't beat hard physical sides like Bolton. Come back when you can make a post grounded in reality and not through rose tinted specs.
 

Azurus

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
1,263
Lampard is so over rated its ridiculous. Fabregas is better on the ball and with better distribution. The only thing Lampard has over Fabregas is a better shot.
 

Calaen

I am a massive cock who isn't firing atm!
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,538
Azurus said:
Imo Fabreagas>Lampard and Clichey>Cole.

Anyway you can't look at it player for player you have to do it in pairs really.

E.g. Gallas+Toure=Carvalho+Terry.

Imo we have equal defence and i would take Fabregas and Gilberto over Lampard/Essien anyday.

We are also stronger up front. Henry+Van Persie>Drogba+Shevchenko.

Chelsea are stronger on the wings and in goal so the teams are fairly equal but Arsenal are *slightly* ahead.

You cannot compare them in pairs, because Chelsea play with 3 up front. Best player on the park for Arsenal was Adebayor, he caused us the biggest problems.

Eboe and Clichy played ok, but come up against Kevin Davies and Boltons direct style of play and he looks average even on his day. I also recall Christian Nade leaving toure for dead a few weeks ago :p
 

Azurus

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
1,263
cHodAX said:
Oh I am sorry, aren't you 4th in the league with those same players you are extoling the virtues of? They are as good as they have ever been and yet you are 4th, the points total doesn't lie, you aren't a better side than your postition because you can't beat hard physical sides like Bolton. Come back when you can make a post grounded in reality and not through rose tinted specs.

No actually. We have had Henry, Van Persie and Gallas out long term, so thats where your argument falls down.
 

Aile

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 21, 2004
Messages
518
I'd rather take Essien and lampard over Fabregas and Gilberto though,
Essien has been one of the outstanding players of the season for me so far and hes a match winner, and we all aware of what Lampard can do when hes on song, still one of the best players in the Premiership.. They generally contribute alot more to attack, but if you were gunna compare like for like, then Makelele > Gilberto as a defensive midfielder for me any day. Noone has played that role as well as he has in the span of the Premiership
 

cHodAX

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
19,742
Azurus said:
Lampard is so over rated its ridiculous. Fabregas is better on the ball and with better distribution. The only thing Lampard has over Fabregas is a better shot.

I agree, Fabregas is developing in a true world class midfielder and I honestly think he has a better all round game than Lampard.
 

Calaen

I am a massive cock who isn't firing atm!
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,538
Marc said:
Fabregas and Gilberto over Essien and Lampard. Are you for real???? Obviously its your opinion, but still. I cant quite see how. Essien is 10 times the holding player Gilberto is and Fabregas still has some way to go to be as good as Lampard. There is no doubt Fabregas has the potential, but at the moment hes not the Player Lampard is.

I think Lamps is the most over rated midfielder in the country. I know he scores goals but he does shit all else :) Fabregas is a much better technical player, he also has a better eye for what is going on around him.
 

Azurus

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
1,263
Calaen said:
You cannot compare them in pairs, because Chelsea play with 3 up front. Best player on the park for Arsenal was Adebayor, he caused us the biggest problems.

Eboe and Clichy played ok, but come up against Kevin Davies and Boltons direct style of play and he looks average even on his day. I also recall Christian Nade leaving toure for dead a few weeks ago :p

Not really 3 up front, havn't seen Robben or Cole play that far up more attacking wingers imo.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom