Serathule said:Hahahahahahahahhahahaahahahaahahahhahhahahaha :kissit:
Muylaetrix said:you make a thread, and get if you are lucky 1 out of 5 serious replies who allow for further debate and 4 out of 5 useless flames
Muylaetrix said:it`s the attitude from the `competitive` players vs the `casual` players that is the source of my `whining`.
Muylaetrix said:to start a debate, unfortunately i don`t seem very good at that. i wanted a debate about the nature of a lot of the posting done here. to me it seems like a place to whine, yell and abuse and do a lot other stuff i am not happy to see in a place that is suposed to have a riendly atmosphere to debate and argument.
ofc i should be the place for debate and argument. but it stopped being that too much imho. it stopped being a forum for the players and became a playground for an ancient elite.
then again, a lot more people left than just the afore mentioned people adn that is regretable...
/irony on
flim !!! bring out the hammer of banzoring, this forum needs cleansing !
right
/irony of
yeah, i think somehow in the process the forum gotten a bit of track.
Shike said:There is this bandcamp who is allergic to all the horrible dreadful nasty evul LEET people.. who the fuck ever those now are.. I honestly dont know. Im starting to think they are lil green men with funny hats running around dragging some weird rumour to people who truly enjoy competative RVR.
Then we have another bandcamp that hate when that first bandcamp come and ruin their "fun" and their "experience" in RvR since they have never done anything in particular to ever hurt the first group. This bandcamp is quite vocal on forums sometimes and yell nasty things on FH!! but generally ingame, they are actually really nice, helpful and genuine people who helps the realm with raids and repairing doors and even getting wood and these evul nasty bastards have actually done this for years, all they get in return for beeing there, for assisting every single raidleader and do as those say they get a big FUCK YOU ASSHOLE in return from the first bandcamp.
Muylaetrix said:funny as you represent it, i tend to agree on a lot of things.
a) the casuals don`t like the leet, because some of the leet are rather abusive towards the casuals for `interfering` in `their` game. this verbal abuse is imho the biggest problem that the casuals have with the competitive players. their (some that is) language, their (...) attitude.
b) the leet don`t like the casuals (unless they can farm the ones from the enemy realm) because they are competition for rp and do all sorts of horrible stuff like join in an ongoing fight, break irvr, run around with more than 8 and do all sorts of other stuff the leet don`t like.
the casuals don`t like the attitude of (some of the) competitive crowd.
the competitive crowd don`t like the ingame actions of the casuals.
from my pov ofc.
Genedril said:If you want people to talk & get along drop the loaded comments, drop the 'you don't deserve to be here' attitudes (I've spent over 4 years on Hib/pryd) & stop behaving like a bunch of hormonal teenagers who think that they will impress their friends by being trying to be cool (pointer: If you're trying to be cool you're not) & giving someone else a load of hassle.
Muylaetrix said:it would be foolish to asume that this is one definable `group`, just like the AC raiders are not 1 definable group with an agenda. it`s an attitude towards fellow players, across all 3 realms. i hate the attitude of `you are either part of the group, or you are walking RP, or you are competition for RP`.
Muylaetrix said:fighting the same foe as a realm mate has nothing to do with respect or the lack of it imho. flaming a fellow player because he broke a unwriten rule of the game within the game is something that makes me puke.
Muylaetrix said:it`s the attitude from the `competitive` players vs the `casual` players that is the source of my `whining`.
Muylaetrix said:i think this thread illustrates my point well enough to a certain degree.
Muylaetrix said:maybe that is part of my statement and maybe i just don`t like the condecending flamers and the leet kids ? and where am i suposed to go for a DECENT debate and not a flame fest then ?
Bible somewhere said:“And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but perceivest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Muylaetrix said:funny as you represent it, i tend to agree on a lot of things.
a) the casuals don`t like the leet, because some of the leet are rather abusive towards the casuals for `interfering` in `their` game. this verbal abuse is imho the biggest problem that the casuals have with the competitive players. their (some that is) language, their (...) attitude.
b) the leet don`t like the casuals (unless they can farm the ones from the enemy realm) because they are competition for rp and do all sorts of horrible stuff like join in an ongoing fight, break irvr, run around with more than 8 and do all sorts of other stuff the leet don`t like.
the casuals don`t like the attitude of (some of the) competitive crowd.
the competitive crowd don`t like the ingame actions of the casuals.
from my pov ofc.
Gahn said:U sir are a mystery to me, u start a thread flaming 90% of peeps posting in the Forums and then ask where u can start a thread for a decent debate and u are amused u get nasty thing thrown at u?
Take an hint, start a thread without flaming your possible interlocutors and maybe u can achieve it. Fook me also for wasting my time explaining the obvious.
kirennia said:I am however more annoyed at the bias of the whole situation. The fact that you yourself said that you want the whole 'leaver' population to die irl; you were reported yet the posts were simply deleted (all references to your comments too)without a banning just backs this whole thing up. Whereas on the other side of things, people have been warned for simple posts nowhere even close to as nasty as the one you wrote.
Eversmallx said:Well, you have one odd pov. As far as it see it, the minority of whining no life crap ruined this server, there werent many boundaries between leet/casual. Casual's can be annoying with there breaking of irvr, red is dead etc. Same as Leet can be annoying with the 'dont kill my kill, but i will add on yours tho majt". All in all it balances out tho, to me it doesnt seem like a big issue.
Muylaetrix said:funny as you represent it, i tend to agree on a lot of things.
a) the casuals don`t like the leet, because some of the leet are rather abusive towards the casuals for `interfering` in `their` game. this verbal abuse is imho the biggest problem that the casuals have with the competitive players. their (some that is) language, their (...) attitude.
b) the leet don`t like the casuals (unless they can farm the ones from the enemy realm) because they are competition for rp and do all sorts of horrible stuff like join in an ongoing fight, break irvr, run around with more than 8 and do all sorts of other stuff the leet don`t like.
the casuals don`t like the attitude of (some of the) competitive crowd.
the competitive crowd don`t like the ingame actions of the casuals.
from my pov ofc.
Cromcruaich said:Its time you stopped perpetuating this now. Drop it, walk away from it, reform your world view, its getting oh so tired. Your looking like a crusader with nothing to crusade against. Go get your friends on here, do something positive and get some new blood in here and along the way drop you're preconceptions.
Muylaetrix said:flaming a fellow player because he broke a unwriten rule of the game within the game is something that makes me puke.
Sharkith said:if thats the case why not just say this? Why do you attach these attitudes to some sort of group that doesn't actually exist - if they existed you could define them but since you can't then what the fuck are you talking about Muly?
Like I said to Braken before - call a spade a spade. If it is attitude your on about then call it attitude. At least Bracken had the sense to clarify himself. Something you have yet to learn. Sorry but you started this looking a discussion, you did it by opening with an attack on a group you now admit don't really exist.
Sharkith said:Now this is important Muly. What is your point with this thread?
Sharkith said:because Muly you do sound like your being hypocritical. One of the things FH is good for is smelling hypocrisy a mile off. Look at many of the flames and counter flames they highlight hypocrisy and they react to it.
cmr said:And ofcourse its back to the old
"Im a nice guy because i add and zerg on everything and dont give a shit whether anyone else has fun but myself and my di bot"
and
"Your a wanker irl because you were/are a better player than me and even though you played fg vs fg rvr and didnt interfere in my type of rvr i still hate you! because you physically force me to click any post with the word agramon and then proceed to copy and paste my whine from my storage bank of whine while i wait for moc3 to come back up"
Muylaetrix said:i vaguely remember writing such a post at 6 o clock in the morning bleeding drunk, in a very destructive and hatefull mood, 2 days after my dad died, yes, i am glad that thing got deleted, yes.
i apologize in shame for that one.
and you can`t say i didn`t get a few days of suspension or warning or whatever cause you woulnd`t know, know would you ?
Muylaetrix said:funny as you represent it, i tend to agree on a lot of things.
a) the casuals don`t like the leet, because some of the leet are rather abusive towards the casuals for `interfering` in `their` game. this verbal abuse is imho the biggest problem that the casuals have with the competitive players. their (some that is) language, their (...) attitude.
Muylaetrix said:b) the leet don`t like the casuals (unless they can farm the ones from the enemy realm) because they are competition for rp and do all sorts of horrible stuff like join in an ongoing fight, break irvr, run around with more than 8 and do all sorts of other stuff the leet don`t like.
the casuals don`t like the attitude of (some of the) competitive crowd.
the competitive crowd don`t like the ingame actions of the casuals.
from my pov ofc.
elbeek said:Just when things were calming down Muy has to fucking shit stir. WTF is wrong with you these days?
kirennia said:I think this is where your argument becomes flawed. Some people don't like other people. Some FGers don't like other FGers as some casuals don't like other casuals. It is you pigeonholing everyone saying THE casuals don't like THE leet which is all crap. There are as many 'leet' people in the casual crowd as there are in the FG scene; it's a bad usage of quotation to reference all FGs as leetists. In fact, most FGers are simply casual players who don't play that often but enjoy a different aspect of the game.
When in TT in albion, I played for 3 hours, 2 nights a week and as a FGer.
That would in essence come under your catagory of 'leet' despite the fact I'm so unleet the irony isn't even that funny. I am simply enjoying another aspect of the game these days. Before in lod I played some 8 hours, 5 days a week in pve yet by your term of phrase, being a pver would then have made me me casual?
6hours is less casual then 40 hours?
kirennia said:The 'leet' by which I presume you still mean the FG crowd, by no means don't like the casuals and to say that is silly. Most of my closer friends come from the casual crowd. The people who get on the 'leets' tits are the people who go around CALLING them leet in the first place and purposefully ruining their fights with malice.
kirennia said:I'm not talking about adding at a bridge, running in a zerg or taking keeps/towers. I'm talking about when asked politely to not add, respond saying 'FO, I'LL PLAY HOW I WANT, COC MATES!'. They're within their rights to do so and most people realise this but a polite request shouldn't be responded to like this.
Muylaetrix said:it is an attitude of a group of players. that group of players might be hard to define as a group, the attitude is not. i find most people with that attitude in the `competitive` camp, while i have no doubts that there are are people with that very attitude in the `casual` camp.
with group i mean `a selection of people` not a group/guild/alliance/camp/realm.
Muylaetrix said:people flame too much and use too much profanity, can`t we try to be more civilized ? that must be about it.
Muylaetrix said:hard to judge myself i guess, the reactions in this thread already made it clear to me that the original question was phrased in a much too agresive way, yeah.
Oh yes, and i am soo guilty of overgeneralizing and stuff, but at least i try not to trhow shit at indiviuals. but maybe that is just as bad, i don`t know.
Muylaetrix said:the terminology used is sometimes a bigger obstacle than what we are trying to say.
Muylaetrix said:flaming a fellow player because he broke a unwriten rule of the game within the game is something that makes me puke.