Infils = 2 button class

R

Runolaz

Guest
Originally posted by donttouchpoopy
duh

This infil is a number of months old.

And you think I've never got past amg?

Riiiiight......

Go sit down now please.

Only thing that comes to mind is - FotM
 
I

infernalwrath

Guest
Re: Re: Re: Infils = 2 button class

Originally posted by behatch
har de har,an alb telling someone to cry him a river

i THINK u will find albs cry about savages,LA,healers,soon SM

why dont u just stfu and go post some savage whine
unlike u i dont whine i accept the game the way it is
so stfu and cry cause mythic nerfed your precious sb
 
B

behatch

Guest
Originally posted by donttouchpoopy
Was a few nights ago - grove sw of amg. You'd poped a couple of NS, and being the kind and generous soul I am I went for the one you weren't hitting.

Never fought you with my infil though.

Nikki is cocky though - tends to try and take on amg solo.

lol@ the niki comment-maybe she is just trying to get past your zerging arse.Oh and you uncover her,what u want her to run away from 1fg infils-might get away but chances are slim.so if i was u i'd stfu.
 
B

behatch

Guest
Re: Re: Re: Re: Infils = 2 button class

Originally posted by infernalwrath
unlike u i dont whine i accept the game the way it is
so stfu and cry cause mythic nerfed your precious sb

lool....you got to be jokeing,why dont i stop crying? the LA nerf isnt the problem is the zerging infils,and they nerfed shadowzerks,now infil have come up with mercfils-takes piss tbh
 
B

BidAccount

Guest
Originally posted by Runolaz
Only thing that comes to mind is - FotM

LOL - you are dumber than a donkeys ass!

I rolled this infil when the BGs came out! If I'd wanted FOTM at the time I'd have kept the BG SB I rolled on Pryd!

This infil has been around a while - slowly solo'd to 50 during some long nights because i wanted a character I could pick up, solo with, and put down without leaving a group in the lurch.

If I'd wanted an uber overpowered skill free class I'd have kept the SB.
 
B

BidAccount

Guest
Originally posted by behatch
lol@ the niki comment-maybe she is just trying to get past your zerging arse.Oh and you uncover her,what u want her to run away from 1fg infils-might get away but chances are slim.so if i was u i'd stfu.

Nah - nikkis done it more than once. Attacked Aussie on the battlements, and another infil in front of amg. Either very confident, or suicidal.

(And a mid complaining about zerging? Hello pot - meet kettle).
 
B

behatch

Guest
Originally posted by donttouchpoopy
Nah - nikkis done it more than once. Attacked Aussie on the battlements, and another infil in front of amg. Either very confident, or suicidal.

And i suppose she would have still attacked aussie if she new the infil was there-but i suppose you can kind of guess there will be at least one :/
 
B

BidAccount

Guest
Originally posted by behatch
And i suppose she would have still attacked aussie if she new the infil was there-but i suppose you can kind of guess there will be at least one :/

Beats me.

But even I've got the brains not to try and take on mmg solo - I know it'll be crawling with nasty little sb vermin.
 
B

behatch

Guest
Originally posted by donttouchpoopy
Beats me.

But even I've got the brains not to try and take on mmg solo - I know it'll be crawling with nasty little sb vermin.

actually,the only time there is sb at mmg IS because,they are waiting to move amg,or they are waiting for the grp mates to port,etc-if i was to log on now-lets say ported 5 mins i bet there wont be any sb's there,but i`m not going to as my tea's rdy :)
 
B

behatch

Guest
Originally posted by donttouchpoopy
Beats me.

But even I've got the brains not to try and take on mmg solo - I know it'll be crawling with nasty little sb vermin.

actually thats exactly what i'd say about amg,about infils-the warders power lvl'd by necros
 
B

BidAccount

Guest
Originally posted by behatch
actually,the only time there is sb at mmg IS because,they are waiting to move amg,or they are waiting for the grp mates to port,etc-if i was to log on now-lets say ported 5 mins i bet there wont be any sb's there,but i`m not going to as my tea's rdy :)

Hehe - we like it when they come to amg, because frankly the SB stealthzerg sucks ass. The hibs are much better - they can at least take down even numbers. The SBs normally manage a kill then get stomped.
 
B

behatch

Guest
Originally posted by donttouchpoopy
Hehe - we like it when they come to amg, because frankly the SB stealthzerg sucks ass. The hibs are much better - they can at least take down even numbers. The SBs normally manage a kill then get stomped.

erm,thats because they have AP,which tbh is uber,wait i min,nerf ap!!!!!! And tbh we hard that stupid run faster in stealth ra,its so shit i carnt even remeber then name.lol :)
 
B

behatch

Guest
oh,and actually my guild had 5 in grp,and almost instant killed 4 infils/scout,dont kow what the fight was like because i unstuck and just seen the rp spam \o/ :)

none of them had below 50% hp aswell,probly Warder zerg imo :O
 
R

Runolaz

Guest
Originally posted by donttouchpoopy
LOL - you are dumber than a donkeys ass!

I rolled this infil when the BGs came out! If I'd wanted FOTM at the time I'd have kept the BG SB I rolled on Pryd!

This infil has been around a while - slowly solo'd to 50 during some long nights because i wanted a character I could pick up, solo with, and put down without leaving a group in the lurch.

If I'd wanted an uber overpowered skill free class I'd have kept the SB.

Yeah, go for the personal insults if that makes you fell better, but your Inf is still FotM. I also made this Savage at the time they came - still, if I had dinged 50 2 mounths ago, it would have been FotM just like you. There are ppl that started their SB a long time ago, dinged 50 b4 you even got out of BG with your INF and called FotM-SB's. Just quess where that puts you.

lol...yeah...SB are overpowered and Inf's not, that a new one.
 
X

Xandax

Guest
Originally posted by donttouchpoopy
<snip>
(And a mid complaining about zerging? Hello pot - meet kettle).

Yeah - pot alread met kettle, that is why pot started to zerg to counter alb... eehh - I mean kettles zerg.
 
X

Xandax

Guest
Originally posted by Runolaz
Yeah, go for the personal insults if that makes you fell better, but your Inf is still FotM. I also made this Savage at the time they came - still, if I had dinged 50 2 mounths ago, it would have been FotM just like you. There are ppl that started their SB a long time ago, dinged 50 b4 you even got out of BG with your INF and called FotM-SB's. Just quess where that puts you.

lol...yeah...SB are overpowered and Inf's not, that a new one.

Give it up Runolaz - you can't use logic with fotms like that :) Double standards and deniel are two very strong features with such players as these :rolleyes:
They will zerg whine us all down into "submission" as they have zerged all other things in this game :)
 
B

BidAccount

Guest
Originally posted by Runolaz
Yeah, go for the personal insults if that makes you fell better, but your Inf is still FotM. I also made this Savage at the time they came - still, if I had dinged 50 2 mounths ago, it would have been FotM just like you. There are ppl that started their SB a long time ago, dinged 50 b4 you even got out of BG with your INF and called FotM-SB's. Just quess where that puts you.

lol...yeah...SB are overpowered and Inf's not, that a new one.

Difference being you knew way in advance that savages were overpowered and the US servers fotm character of choice.

My infil was not fotm when it was created all those months ago. And the only people that seem to think it is fotm now were the holders of the fotm crown for a long time - the shadowjerk.

So I'm afraid - it is official. You are still dumber than a donkeys ass, because if you had read correctly you'd have noticed I levelled a SB through the BGs around the same time as my infil. I just didn't keep it. Notice the use of past tense here - they were a ridiculously overpowered no skill class. Now they're balanced - end of story.

But theres no point arguing with shadowjerks - they will whine and sulk and cry in a vain attempt to regain their 'uber' overpowered status. Sorry girls - isn't going to happen, but keep whining if it helps you.
 
B

behatch

Guest
Originally posted by donttouchpoopy
Difference being you knew way in advance that savages were overpowered and the US servers fotm character of choice.

My infil was not fotm when it was created all those months ago. And the only people that seem to think it is fotm now were the holders of the fotm crown for a long time - the shadowjerk.

So I'm afraid - it is official. You are still dumber than a donkeys ass, because if you had read correctly you'd have noticed I levelled a SB through the BGs around the same time as my infil. I just didn't keep it. Notice the use of past tense here - they were a ridiculously overpowered no skill class. Now they're balanced - end of story.

But theres no point arguing with shadowjerks - they will whine and sulk and cry in a vain attempt to regain their 'uber' overpowered status. Sorry girls - isn't going to happen, but keep whining if it helps you.

why dont u just say ur fotm and be done with it? save a lot of time,tbh who cares what others think apart from pretty boys.
 
B

BidAccount

Guest
Originally posted by behatch
why dont u just say ur fotm and be done with it? save a lot of time,tbh who cares what others think apart from pretty boys.

lol - yeah I'm fotm - I ditch the fotm SB and keep the infil that was outclassed for months by SBs.

And the irony that seems to be lost on many is that it is the very definition of fotm (or ex fotm), the SB with its overpowered damage, ease of play and huge population influx, now pointing fingers blindly.
 
A

Apprentice

Guest
Givf More whine!!!!!!11!!

Whine about buffbots, stealtherzergs, lagg, more zerg's, mom tells you to go to sleep.....


more whine more whine......





+1
 
B

behatch

Guest
Originally posted by donttouchpoopy
lol - yeah I'm fotm - I ditch the fotm SB and keep the infil that was outclassed for months by SBs.

And the irony that seems to be lost on many is that it is the very definition of fotm (or ex fotm), the SB with its overpowered damage, ease of play and huge population influx, now pointing fingers blindly.

why have u suddenly started playing your shadowblade when its fotm? because you are fotm,people like remi etc are not fotm all though there chars are.I just dont think you understand tbh.
 
B

BidAccount

Guest
Originally posted by behatch
why have u suddenly started playing your shadowblade when its fotm? because you are fotm,people like remi etc are not fotm all though there chars are.I just dont think you understand tbh.

If you had a brain you'd read correctly.

I started a lot of chatracters when the BGs came out - my armsman had hit 50, my cleric was semi retired and I just wanted some low level rvr. I think I went through most Alb characters, some Mids and a few Hib ones. Now if trying out as many characters as possible to see what they're like and gauge strengths and weaknesses is fotm, then you have a definition misconception.

Some of those characters I took thru to BG3.

One made it throught to 50 - my infil, purely because at that time I needed a solo class and it was a toss up between scout and infil.
 
B

behatch

Guest
Originally posted by donttouchpoopy
If you had a brain you'd read correctly.

I started a lot of chatracters when the BGs came out - my armsman had hit 50, my cleric was semi retired and I just wanted some low level rvr. I think I went through most Alb characters, some Mids and a few Hib ones. Now if trying out as many characters as possible to see what they're like and gauge strengths and weaknesses is fotm, then you have a definition misconception.

Some of those characters I took thru to BG3.

One made it throught to 50 - my infil, purely because at that time I needed a solo class and it was a toss up between scout and infil.

this doesent prove your not fotm,ye savages rolled there chars because it was a toss between sav and warrior,honest.They told me so.this therefore means,they arent fotm.Think again m'fer
 
B

BidAccount

Guest
So basically your argument is I'm fotm because you said so?

riiiiiiiight.....
 
B

behatch

Guest
Originally posted by donttouchpoopy
So basically your argument is I'm fotm because you said so?

riiiiiiiight.....

er duh,ofc,what i say goes! understand? :)
 
B

BidAccount

Guest
Lol - says the man with a Sb, Healer and savage in his sig....
 
K

knoll

Guest
Originally posted by donttouchpoopy
If you had a brain you'd read correctly.

I started a lot of chatracters when the BGs came out - my armsman had hit 50, my cleric was semi retired and I just wanted some low level rvr. I think I went through most Alb characters, some Mids and a few Hib ones. Now if trying out as many characters as possible to see what they're like and gauge strengths and weaknesses is fotm, then you have a definition misconception.

Some of those characters I took thru to BG3.

One made it throught to 50 - my infil, purely because at that time I needed a solo class and it was a toss up between scout and infil.


to bad hewhotoucheothersgenitals suck so bad.

yes u do u DF abusing fotm ;P
 
B

behatch

Guest
Originally posted by donttouchpoopy
Lol - says the man with a Sb, Healer and savage in his sig....

hang on,savage lvl 29 now :p

btw,i dont understand how healers can really be fotm,there required in grps? thus u exspect ppl not to play them because there fotm,lool stfu imo
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Similar threads

B
Replies
43
Views
1K
belth
B
M
Replies
71
Views
2K
knoll
K
N
Replies
17
Views
740
quinthar
Q
P
Replies
98
Views
3K
Rollie
R
X
Replies
28
Views
2K
J
Top Bottom