200 years is just a "example timeline", more like 50 years or so.
Race, religion, cultural difference...same sh*t, different package.
They don't do "more crimes", they get reported more by the media.
Two drunks fighting isn't news, a muslim beating up a christian is.
and the majority of inmates in american prisons are black or hispanic,
so are you telling me thats due to thier skin colour ?
Aaaaaaaahahahahahaah......... omghahaahahlolololozzzizizizihihihkekekelolol.
Best one yet. So now you're saying that muslims dont actually do more crimes, they're just picked on by the media? Ahahah. Thanks man. Made my day.![]()
"In his book, Nicolai Sennels shares a psychological perspective of this Muslim Culture, its relationship to anger, handling emotions and its religion."
The very famous politician, Naser Khader, who is Muslim and the author of the bestseller “Honor and Shame”, wrote a review of my book and stated that it should be “obligatory reading for students, social workers and teachers.” Jyllands-Posten, the brave newspaper that first published the Mohammed cartoons, calls the book “an original piece of pioneer "
If his methods were not scientific enough then i dont think this would have gotten enough attention let alone praise from some muslims.
His aim was to study how islam affects the offenders thinking. If similar patterns can be found in most of the test subjects then its safe to say that islam is a major contributing factor why muslims are doing so many crimes.
Why is this not good enough?
True, but it doesn't just apply to Muslims. Listen to any group of friends debating something in a pub - the loudest one is usually the one that has the least substance to their point.it does seem that the Muslim's with the loudest voices talk the most shit.
True, but it doesn't just apply to Muslims. Listen to any group of friends debating something in a pub - the loudest one is usually the one that has the least substance to their point.
I think the guy's talking out of his arse. Sure there are SOME Muslims that are trouble-makers. But this doesn't mean all Muslims are impossible to integrate into western society. Yet another example of xenohpobic ignorance.
Right, because this is clearly a religion issue!?
/..plants head on table!
wow they found a danish guy willing to say this, really!?
wonder if this had been news if he was say norwegien..
I bet you the book is full of social stereo types, and it must be the fact that they are muslims, and not the fact that most muslims in denmark live generally in low income areas and ghettos, most come from historic fugetive back grounds ect and so on...No! it must be that theya re muslims!
Really!?
cultural ? sure, middel eastern ? sure, but muslim...really? Really!?!?
sod it cba*
this is jsut as retared as blaming Denmark in general or say Anders fogh for the muhammed pics.
I can Understand why a muslim would be offended, but then be mad at the sorce "that would be the news paper that printed it" yet amazingly...well...you get the general point, oh and i dont even like Anders fjøh!
read whats being said, and in it's context, not what you want it to be,
I said could it be cultural sure, could it be geografical, sure , I actually never said that any where to blame, or did that slip your comprihension ?
you need to look at things in their entirety,
so here's a break down,
Statement 1: young European muslims commint more crimes due to thier choice of religion.
Statement 2: young muslims commint more crimes due to social circumstances.
now wich would you deduct to be the most likely ?
he does a study on 150 people in youth jail and then goes on to conclude about muslims in general .....
tbh he wouldnt even qualify as board troll![]()
Hey, look at me even! I talk utter bullsh*t and post the most :lol:
Ironic that you were the one to post that Tohtori![]()
Actually, it's considered to be qualitative interviews. A comparison would be: If you write a bachelor thesis 4-5 interviews is enough(2 months), if you write a master-thesis it would require maybe the double amount(4-5 months), while a phd-thesis would maybe require 50-100 (3-4 years). So I would say his empirical material is pretty good. Maybe you should read the book before you make any assumptions or judge his findings.
Actually, it's considered to be qualitative interviews. A comparison would be: If you write a bachelor thesis 4-5 interviews is enough(2 months), if you write a master-thesis it would require maybe the double amount(4-5 months), while a phd-thesis would maybe require 50-100 (3-4 years). So I would say his empirical material is pretty good. Maybe you should read the book before you make any assumptions or judge his findings.
I'm not a racist, and I don't have a problem with Oriental People (my wife being Assyrian), but I do seriously distrust anything that has got to do with Islam.
See, that's the error most people make.Then i have to point out that a step from "no muslims" is "no middle-easterns" and that would effect you personally.
See, that's the error most people make.
Middle-Eastern does not automatically mean Muslim.
Did i say they were?
I said that a step from "no muslims" country is a "no middle-easterns period" country.
People already, like you said, don't differentiate between a muslim and a middle-eastern, so it might become a reality that a total anti-ME culture could be born.
Which is exactly why this madness has to stop.
Right...right...
So your answer to this is?
Keep muslims where they are?
Keep people in their own countries for good?
No immigration at all?
Every country in the world where they come, they force the locals to adapt to their traditions, instead of them integrating.
hmm first of all i think you quoted a wrong post.
second , yes his interviews are what you call qualitative interviews , he does them on two different ethnic groups and then compare the two sets.
third , as i allready explained these "qualitative interviews" still has no link or back up for the broad and sweeping statements he makes about muslims and muslim culture in general.
There are certain situations where quantitative takes priority over qualitative. I believe this is one of them.
He's not basing it strictly on the interviews, they are complementary, and he's not making "sweeping" statements without support, he's refering to his own findings and other findings and statistics. An example would be:
"In Germany, only 12% of their 3.5 million Muslims see themselves as more German than Muslim; in France and Denmark, only 14% of the Muslim populations respectively see"
"integration of muslims in western societies not possible" is a rather broad and sweeping statement wich is factually untrue so i doubt he backs it up..
"integration of muslims in western societies not possible" is a rather broad and sweeping statement wich is factually untrue so i doubt he backs it up..