Alcohol isn't food. Can you Google a bit harder this time for your usual echo chamber link?This isn't just about poor people - obesity is cross-demographic.
There's good evidence that making junk food more expensive will have the desired outcomes:
The Effectiveness of Tax Policy Interventions for Reducing Excessive Alcohol Consumption and Related Harms
A systematic review of the literature to assess the effectiveness of alcohol tax policy interventions for reducing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms was conducted for the Guide to Community Preventive Services (Community Guide). Seventy-two ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
And frankly, there are costs associated with poor health that the most vulnerable can't afford.
In the absence of banning these foods (freedom of choice!!!) the next lever is clearly financial.
Frankly - we shouldn't be eating that shit. We've had years of public health campaigns and yet 70% of our population is unhealthily fat.
Tough titties if it's nanny-statism - if the british public took personal responsibility for their own health and stopped cramming shit into their puffy, bloated maws (and that's not an 'emotive' description of Brits, but a scientifically verified one) then there wouldn't be a need for government to pull these moves anyway.
Agreed. Except, unfortunately, that isn't what would happen. The funds would never make it back to that cause.What would be good is if unhealthy food was taxed and that revenue used to subsidise healthy food.
There should be a big push to teach more life skills like this, that would be more likely to break the back of all of this.And proper food and cooking education at school, parents don't teach their kids to cook any more.
I was demonstrating that there's good evidence that financial measures drive behaviour.Alcohol isn't food. Can you Google a bit harder this time for your usual echo chamber link?
1) I'm not for increasing the cost of "everything" - I'm for increasing the cost of shit.I'm sure anyone using a food bank, will totally agree with your desires to increase the cost of everything.
I agree with @Raven's statement (and I have previously stated the same, multiple times). Increased tax take should go on subsidy for healthy foods.Agreed. Except, unfortunately, that isn't what would happen. The funds would never make it back to that cause.
Absolutely. The Tories killed off home economics in the 80's. But I don't think this is the only thing - it should be a combination of things - including making bad shit more expensive.There should be a big push to teach more life skills like this, that would be more likely to break the back of all of this.
Problem is that people are not going to, as you can see from these forums, be remotely interested in your sanctimonious way of expressing your point of view - not just this thread either. Empathy is super important - it is a shame you have not learned this life lesson yet and you probably never ever will...I was demonstrating that there's good evidence that financial measures drive behaviour.
Also junk "food" isn't food. It's junk.
1) I'm not for increasing the cost of "everything" - I'm for increasing the cost of shit.
2) It's not all about the poor - as clearly stated: it's a cross section of society
3) You've ignored the high cost of poor health point - which hits the poorest hardest
and 4):
I agree with @Raven's statement (and I have previously stated the same, multiple times). Increased tax take should go on subsidy for healthy foods.
The fact that you believe it'll never make it doesn't make the proposal a bad one.
Absolutely. The Tories killed off home economics in the 80's. But I don't think this is the only thing - it should be a combination of things - including making bad shit more expensive.
Edit:
If personal responsibility worked Meg then we wouldn't be having this conversation - but it clearly doesn't. It's an abject failure. And the outright resistance to framing this as a "freedom+responsibility" issue - even on this very forum - shows that it's not a goer.
If people won't sort themselves out then there are only a few levers left you can pull to fix the situation. Nobody wants to ban food types. It won't float and the public won't accept it. So whilst you await your "utopian" Home Economics classes - which have already been done away with and would take a generation to show any results (which would be mixed at best) - that leaves money or public education messaging.
Public education messaging doesn't work.
Money does.
I don't have sympathy for some on this forum because they clearly spend their lives dodging all personal responsibility.Problem is that people are not going to, as you can see from these forums, be remotely interested in your sanctimonious way of expressing your point of view - not just this thread either. Empathy is super important - it is a shame you have not learned this life lesson yet and you probably never ever will...
Coronavirus: Oxford vaccine triggers immune response
Study shows the vaccine is safe, but it is still too soon to know if it can stop people from being infected.www.bbc.co.uk
I just had a large Big Mac meal with a proper Coke. It was yum.
Not a problem tbh.The real kicker about that double sausage and egg mcmuffin is it was a surprise so I had already had a bowl of shreddies 🤤
This doesn't make any sense as a sentence?Quite ridiculous...for anyone under 50 the potential for health problems far exceeds that of catching covid.
Fingers crossedLooks like Northampton will be in lockdown soon, hopefully the villages aren't affected. Pub opens on the 1st!
I very much hope humans have evolved - if Sweden is correct you are talking about 20+% of the population- have fun locking that quantity of the population away ....Have to wonder what will happen to the people who have no immune system response, or who are totally asymptomatic, to Covid-19. They'll keep on spreading it for the rest of their lives, like a modern version of Typhoid Mary. They locked up Mary for decades.... will we do the same?
But legal. Like your grant applicationWalked in to our local Tesco Express...only me and one other guy wearing a mask, but his was the valve type which are useless.
I very much hope humans have evolved