Arrogant? In what respect am I arrogant? I am not the one telling people how a person HAS to play.
Not thinking but wishing ill for everyone... It clearly jusifies all action against you.Go PvE and don't pretend to spit bs about the health of a community or a server. At this point i'd really like to see the core of the pvp hardcore guilds back on Dyvet for 3 months running a bg per realm every night kicking the shit out of u and the likes of u from server. Just to let u taste what does it mean being griefed.
Shike: if you stay as stupid as you are now, you will win some. You lie, flame, but yet to post anything else. Shows how stupid you are.
Not thinking but wishing ill for everyone... It clearly jusifies all action against you.
Again: While people said not all people who solo or 8v8 are the same as problematic ones, and we agreed and looked for a way to separate troublemakers.
The likes of you proved you are the most abusive and arrogant bunch, and the definition defined you and the likes of you well, and there is need for actions against the likes of you, and all negative comments against the likes of you are well deserved.
I am happy to see that the likes of you will vanish from the server.
the funny shit is, if you came to me ingame and asked for my help Essen, I would still give it to you, thats the funniest with all this, that you just cant get into your head that people are separating forums, irc, ingame and the ordinary life..
Just have to say that your whole definition theory is as valid as saying
"-I saw a black cat, thus all cats have to be black".
I have to say the same again: Even the a little bad experience with soloers is enough to see some problems happen. If trusted friends who still play on dyvet speaks about the same problem, people who are soloing say not all soloers are like this, that is enough reason to say such soloers exists.
It is your choice to decide:
You recognize yourself from this definition.
You support people who support this behavior.
You say such soloers are rare, you solo and you are different, and you would like a way to solo somewhere.
The first two gets one kind of response, the 3rd gets a whole different story.
Of course you can also say you aren't soloing at all.
Soloers are rare now, very very rare, at least on Dyvet. Cant say Ive seen many at all in the sessions Ive played and its not so odd either, most have given up by now because of all the people steamrolling them and im one of those too more or less, I gave up solo since it was too hard to find likeminded enemys inbetween all my encounters with lifetapping adding casters and such who just never ever spare anything nor do they respect ongoing fights either since its lost RPs watching a fight.
Lol, wtf, is this esse guy for real? No wonder the game's gone to shit
Unfortunately so Gear.
Read my reply to his then read his very last reply to mine .. TRY and make sense of it or something for me. I can not see how he has answered any of my questions.
Reignfire:
clueless? You said as a soloer and FG player I seek to be superior? I asked who what right have you to categorise me when you dont even KNOW me or why I soloer or prefer Fg v FG.. (this statement means SOMETIMES I solo and SOMETIME I run in a fg NOT THAT I am in the Either/Or camp)
Essen:
people who look for superiority in reaching some in game goal in specific set of playing styles.
8v8 and 1v1 people are both subgroups of the 2nd group
Then he comes up with yet another version of the same thing
Essen:
As people said before not all people who do 8v8 or like 8v8 are the "8v8 players" most of the complaints are made against. For this, there is a common understanding: To speak about a group we should define that group.
And should know: not all people who sometimes solo are in the group of soloers we define.
Reignfire:
Arrogant? In what respect am I arrogant? I am not the one telling people how a person HAS to play. I have nowhere pressumed that I am the best at anything. Care to explain? this is the definition of Arrogance WordNet Search - 3.0
Essen:
arrogant: but you claim your argument that has no definitions, no reasoning, but flame is inherently better since it is made by you and likes of you not members of other groups
Once again please tell me from the definition of arogance where have i behaved that i was superior to anyone or implied anyone was inferrior?
Essen:
When you say "we soloers" and then question how people categorize you as soloer, and flame, insult, flame, throw abusive comment, flame, insult, then question when any soloer (including you)
To which I replied:
please please please show me something in game or in game where I have insulted a player for 'adding' / ' zerging'
Essen:
moron: you want to prove that you never make abusive comments anywhere so staing that soloers who meet the definition doesn't make either. While this way of arguing would be flawed, but if you combine it with abusive comments and posts, that shows what kind of person you are and your actions support the definitions.
So basically because he made an allegation that I abused people for adding / zerging and i asked him for proof that he couldnt provide ANYWHERE then this makes me a moron ...and asking for him to prove an allegation or slander is a flawed arguement ...
Yes. If they respect my PVE fights
Mutual respect works.
Claiming an area as their own solo land where other people has legitimate bussiness and harasshing, attacking, etc. them won't work, and will end up in people going back and crashing the fights of this two people.
So demanding exlusive access to places and disrespecting others won't work and will result in getting more adds.
THe trouble starts with iRVR.
Wrong in 2 things: NF had some pretty significant positive changes as well, BUT it isn't enough and it should change. OF was wrong in one way, and it was wrong to the extremes. NF is almost as bad to the other way. Now we would need an expansion that is almost as bad as NF (but better) but to the OF way, then a change to NF way, and get closer and closer to the balance. This is how the nerfbat in many games works to balance things, and this is what we seen from Mythic and others for ages. Sadly with NF they stoped working on most problems.If you really sit down and think about how NF is buildt up you will eventually realize that NF is and always been the problem.
.
.
.
Mainly b/c comparing and arguing floating semantics is impossible since they are floating, as in having diffrent meaning to diffrent people.
You speak about intelligence in some of your posts. Most intelligent people realize that putting ppl in diffrent groups or sub groups is valid when making general arguments to make a general point wich doesn't narrow down specific individuals, like you seem to do.
LOL @ another thread hyjacked by solo discussion, and I thought I had too much time at work...
LOL @ another thread hyjacked by solo discussion, and I thought I had too much time at work...
how can a soloer be called a soloer when he has got a bb sitting at a castle giving buffs? - surely that should be called a semi-soloer
How about because at the time they are fighting, for the entire fight, they are only controlling one character. Dont think we'd class horner as solo when he has scarlatina stuck to his sorry french ass.