Politics 2024/25 General Election Voting Intention (2022)

Who do you currently intend to vote for in the next UK general election?

  • Conservatives

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • Labour

    Votes: 14 60.9%
  • SNP

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lib Dems

    Votes: 3 13.0%
  • DUP

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • SDLP

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Green

    Votes: 3 13.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 1 4.3%

  • Total voters
    23

Deebs

Chief Arsewipe
Staff member
Moderator
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 11, 1997
Messages
9,077,775
So then. A 5% "tourist tax".

A tax on when you go on holiday, a tax on business travel, a tax on small businesses that already pay income tax, national insurance on their incomes and/or the other related business taxes if they're above the threshold. A tax on big businesses, and on hospitality (pubs with rooms etc).

Growth at all costs eh?

We're in a taxation death spiral.
I am waiting for a tax on every toilet over one.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
39,207
Why don't we do what other countries do and tax foreigners?
Make it more expensive for people who choose to come to Britain to spend their money. Lets squeeze them even more eh?

To be fair - we don't want poor people visiting. They're the "wrong sort".

Good thinking that man.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,779
Make it more expensive for people who choose to come to Britain to spend their money. Lets squeeze them even more eh?

To be fair - we don't want poor people visiting. They're the "wrong sort".

Good thinking that man.

For places that are rammed like York perhaps? and maybe in peak season, where there's not a demand for more tourists.

That being said last time I went to York I was pretty baffled that there was a member of the council staff who stood next to a bollard all day lifting and lowering it which seemed like you don't need a human to be doing that manually...
 

Deebs

Chief Arsewipe
Staff member
Moderator
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 11, 1997
Messages
9,077,775
For places that are rammed like York perhaps? and maybe in peak season, where there's not a demand for more tourists.

That being said last time I went to York I was pretty baffled that there was a member of the council staff who stood next to a bollard all day lifting and lowering it which seemed like you don't need a human to be doing that manually...
Maybe he was a lifelike robot like a Terminator?
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
39,207
For places that are rammed like York perhaps? and maybe in peak season, where there's not a demand for more tourists.
York is already benefitting massively from tourism - and the taxes getting paid by that economic powerhouse of a tourist city will be enormous.

And they want more money off people?

Your post seems to lean towards discouraging tourism - like tourism at peak times is a bad thing. It's clear that you understand that taxes will discourage that. So that comes back to economic death spiral due to taxation. York (and all of us) can benefit massively from all the business that is raking it in from the people who visit. Do we want to reduce the number of visitors (basically, reduce the number of poor families that can afford to visit) and therefore reduce the overall tax take just to shave £100/month off the rich.

Labour's mindset is a poverty mindset.


That being said last time I went to York I was pretty baffled that there was a member of the council staff who stood next to a bollard all day lifting and lowering it which seemed like you don't need a human to be doing that manually...
Just spent 20 minutes waiting for a "convoy car" to take me down the road past some roadworks. There's 4 people involved in that system. They also have traffic lights, a system that seems to be working fine pretty much everywhere else, but it appears Wales wants to spend taxpayers money really very inefficiently.

But I guess we don't have to worry - the tourist tax will enable these people in non-jobs to keep their non-jobs, whilst making the rest of the principality that little bit poorer overall. :rolleyes:
 

Zarjazz

Identifies as a horologist.
Joined
Dec 11, 2003
Messages
2,479
York is already benefitting massively from tourism - and the taxes getting paid by that economic powerhouse of a tourist city will be enormous.

And they want more money off people?
Since I'm actually living in York I can answer that. The council tax I pay in York is actually higher than I was paying in the centre of the City of London. But then the services I'm getting are much better too. From the few years since I've moved here it seems to be a pretty well run council and city that's kept clean and all the historic monuments are well maintained, but it will not be cheap to keep it that way. Frankly the tourist tax is probably something they've wanted to do just to reduce the absolutely absurd number of tourists that visit -- at peak times the streets can be packed shoulder to shoulder -- similar to what Barcelona implemented. Unfortunately that will affected the poorest worst of all.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
39,207
Since I'm actually living in York I can answer that. The council tax I pay in York is actually higher than I was paying in the centre of the City of London. But then the services I'm getting are much better too. From the few years since I've moved here it seems to be a pretty well run council and city that's kept clean and all the historic monuments are well maintained, but it will not be cheap to keep it that way. Frankly the tourist tax is probably something they've wanted to do just to reduce the absolutely absurd number of tourists that visit -- at peak times the streets can be packed shoulder to shoulder -- similar to what Barcelona implemented. Unfortunately that will affected the poorest worst of all.
Yep exactly - it's a massive success, brings in loads of cash and you've got businesses that don't really need to try to succeed. It's a rammed party town. It might not be great for some, but economically?

The only thing that will happen in York with a tourist tax is slightly less tax take overall. It won't make a material difference to the quality of people's lives who live in the centre of York - it'll still be a party town - and the tourist tax will price out people on a margin. It's the same here in Betws Y Coed - it's a party town, and I knew that before I moved here. And most of the locals know that without tourists we wouldn't have seven pubs in the middle of rural wales. In fact, they'd struggle with more than one if it was just the locals.

I knew a guy (a cunt) who moved between Donnington Park Raceway and East Midlands Airport. He then proceeded to complain to the council that Donnington Park Raceway and East Midlands Airport were too loud. And the council took him seriously rather than say "why did you buy a house between the racetrack and the airport". Sometimes you simply accept reality.

What the tourist tax will do is undoubtedly fill the council's coffers to waste inefficiently on pointless shite - but I'd wager that if we introduce this across the country it'll be a net negative in tax take and make struggling businesses struggle more.

You can look at Spain, which was cheap compared to other countries before they introduced their targetted taxes, that's netural to a small positive. Japan's got an exit tax of £5 when you leave, so it doesn't hit the Japanese. Blighty? It's already expensive here, we already charge double or more VAT than most European destinations. If you add 3% on top of that then that tips a poor family from a staycation to a cheap package holiday in Spain - so all that cash goes to Spain, and leaves the UK.

I honestly think Labour can fuck off. They need to cut costs.
 

Zarjazz

Identifies as a horologist.
Joined
Dec 11, 2003
Messages
2,479
Yep exactly - it's a massive success, brings in loads of cash and you've got businesses that don't really need to try to succeed. It's a rammed party town. It might not be great for some, but economically?
York isn't a party town, it's an overly busy tourist hotspot. Slight difference. But when there are so many tourists it's effecting the lives of the local residents it's understandable which the council would (and should) prioritize. Hell, at least two thirds of the flats in recent builds have been bought purely as AirBnB lets which often means they are simply left empty at off-peak times. I'm sure that's the next target on their list.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
39,207
York isn't a party town
I mean. It kinda is now. (By party town I mean tourist hotspot - and when I go there as a tourist, it's to visit the bars, dance, have a nice time. You know - party)..

Was pretty much going that way when I visited in '92. 34 years later it kind of is what it is. I think if you've lived in the centre your whole life and watched succesions of governments - Conservatives, Labour, Coalition, Tory, Labour again - enact policies that have enabled this, then fair enough. But Labour enacting the tourism tax laws isn't because they give a shit about the residents. They just want more moolah to spend.

I look at it this way - at least you're living in a place people want to go. You could live in a shithole town that nobody wants to visit. I know which I'd pick. (And that would be live on the outskirts, and go into the centre when you've got mates around - for bars and nightlife).
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,779
I mean. It kinda is now. (By party town I mean tourist hotspot - and when I go there as a tourist, it's to visit the bars, dance, have a nice time. You know - party)..

Was pretty much going that way when I visited in '92. 34 years later it kind of is what it is. I think if you've lived in the centre your whole life and watched succesions of governments - Conservatives, Labour, Coalition, Tory, Labour again - enact policies that have enabled this, then fair enough. But Labour enacting the tourism tax laws isn't because they give a shit about the residents. They just want more moolah to spend.

I look at it this way - at least you're living in a place people want to go. You could live in a shithole town that nobody wants to visit. I know which I'd pick. (And that would be live on the outskirts, and go into the centre when you've got mates around - for bars and nightlife).

I can't believe how wrong you are.

At 10PM York was dead when I was there (other than students) because it's full of either middle class families or older people, it's already too expensive for the poor, if anything taxing foreign tourists would make it more affordable for them.

That's because it's a cultural city.

Americans on their tour of Europe won't give a fuck about paying an extra 5%.

Maybe they could use the 5% to pay for local schools to visit the sites for free?

Edit - If it is for Brits too then it is silly, yes.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom