- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 38,818
First they came for...Dislike that you think it's appropriate and proportionate to use that poem in the context of locking a couple of hundred protestors up. They're not being sent to the camps ffs.
First they came for...Dislike that you think it's appropriate and proportionate to use that poem in the context of locking a couple of hundred protestors up. They're not being sent to the camps ffs.
Dislike that you think it's appropriate and proportionate to use that poem in the context of locking a couple of hundred protestors up. They're not being sent to the camps ffs.
Academy of Medical Royal Colleges compared social media and screen time use to the issue of smoking or seatbelts in previous decades, calling it a "unifying force for the medical profession".
While it acknowledged causal evidence between device usage and health harms was scant
Perhaps she should check down the back of her sofa.As gooder place as any...
![]()
Nicola Sturgeon showed 'lack of curiosity' over missing funds, Cherry says
The former SNP MP has called for an independent inquiry into how Peter Murrell was able to embezzle more than £400,000.www.bbc.co.uk
Murky, very very murky.
As gooder place as any...
![]()
Nicola Sturgeon showed 'lack of curiosity' over missing funds, Cherry says
The former SNP MP has called for an independent inquiry into how Peter Murrell was able to embezzle more than £400,000.www.bbc.co.uk
Murky, very very murky.
That is the same thing I said to someone, she may not have been involved, but how come it never seems to have occurred to her at all.
And here's the final ID&V play from Labour:
![]()
Starmer gives tech firms ultimatum to block explicit images on children’s phones
Companies such as Apple and Google have until September to install software or face legislation, says PMwww.theguardian.com
No, it sounds like the phone manufacturers have to install a system which would allow the Government to enforce censorship. First make it sound like it is to protect the children, then roll it out to other groups and eventually everyone. And I bet it will be logging any attempt to visit a site blocked by this "solution".It sounds like it would be a setting on a phone you can put on for your kids? How else would it be enforced?
What's your issue?
How do you Hard ID everyone whilst preserving their right to privacy?What's your issue?
How do you Hard ID everyone whilst preserving their right to privacy?
How would you stop criminals avoiding this?
This is a transparent surveillance grab for the whole population (that wouldn't catch criminals) under the standard "think of the children" paean.
Won't make anyone safer. Will make us all a bit less safe.
Through a 'kid's phone' setting, but we don't know how they're going to apply it, obviously it would be concerning if they do it in the way that Deebs suggested, but there's no outline on implementation.
Porn websites must be pretty good at scanning videos and ensuring that everyone is of age and it's probably at the top of their priorities, why not apply the same kind of technology on a 'kid's phone'?
It's also not just about criminals, kids send the photos to each other then they spread like wildfire through the school which is devastating and happens far more regularly than you think regardless of how many assemblies kids have about don't do this shit and the amount of lessons that is spent on it.