Werewolf WW2 Theme Game 3.0

[Cerb]

nope, merely a mistake.

 

[itcheh]

<Sigh>

I have voted once ... I stated my reason and I have not seen any reason to change ... is that your definition of 'wildly' when others on this boat have voted multiple times already?

At no point have I advocated voting for the silent pig-dogs ... my rants have been to express my distaste at their lack action.

Remember, as I have stated, there is an issue of urgency here.

If me being vocal has stirred your inner-German to take action then GOOD. Who you voted for matters not to me; I am prepared to die for my country. Are you?

I have wasted enough of my time talking to pig-dogs - I think my position and my opinions are quite clear.

 

[Olgaline]

Rubric: 1 vote,
Calaen: 1 vote,
Itcheh: 2 vote,
Sydrik: 1 vote,
Mabs: 3 vote,
Tohtori: 1 vote

6 for majority, 2 are still undecided.

 

[opticle]

Boy, I'm sure glad I made that summary so I could keep track of everything up until now when I come back from working on repairs. They're not going very well in case anyone's interested

So it seems Rubric is continuing to lose it, but no one seems particularly bothered about that.
Itcheh wants to us to take action and kill someone
Toht is suspicious of Mabs, but later votes itcheh due to his aggression
Mabs votes Toht and is suspicious of Nate
Toht votes Mabs and unvotes itcheh
Sydrik votes Mabs
Cerb votes itcheh

I'm at a loss. I don't trust Rubric's attitude. I find Ch3t difficult to read. Uara, Cerb and Sydrik I can't decide if you're being calculating or just quiet, and I'm not sure if Toht / Mabs / Itcheh have just trapped themselves in a net of accusations (based originally on comic votes?) that is ultimately futile..

..But then again, "comic" votes are a relatively safe way for a bad guy to trigger things. There's been a few of those.

We've yet to hear from Uara and Rubric earlier this day.. and I haven't seen anything convince me reliably one way or another from the rest.

I'm going to stick by my vote of Rubric for now, as I don't trust his attitude, even after he's been called out - he's letting us carry on with one another and staying out of the spotlight.

Previous vote summary
Ch3tan has voted Rubric for being a pussy.Calaen has voted Toht for being aggressive
Toht has voted Calaen for his vote
Mabs has voted Nate for sleeping
Nate has voted Sydric for being covered in shitItcheh has voted Calaen
Calaen has unvoted Toht and voted Itcheh
Ch3tan has unvoted Rubric and voted Mabs
Uara has raised suspicion against Nate and Sydrik
Opticle has voted Rubric

 

[Ch3tan]

A clear and obvious attempt to muddy the waters is all your posts are.

I remember you have had quite things sentiments in the past, old comrade. You have changed. Too obvious.

Not to mention the fact that all this claustrophobia is making you either paranoid or you're trying to shift attention or provoke a reaction - either way you are "muddying the waters". I was genuinely trying to help, unlike some. Surprise surprise, you avoid having to summarise to us what is "so obvious for us all to see".

And I don't see what's flawed about it, as summaries go. Look up the definition of the word "summary", if we still have a dictionary on board.

Please tell me where I said it was obvious for all to see?

for meta gaming, dragging up the past, being very dodgy in general (gut feeling) and only seeing yourself as trying to help:

unvote mabs

vote Opti

 

[Rubric]

WHY IS NOBODY TRYING TO FIX THIS BOAT. FOR GODSAKE WE ARE GOING TO DIE DOWN HERE. STOP SQUABBLING AND START FIXING. WE ARE GOING TO SUFFOCATE FFS.

 

[opticle]

Can someone please explain what meta-gaming is to me ? I've asked before but no one ever explained and I don't get it I'm honestly trying my best not to do it so don't bitch about it in game as if it's intentional and I'm a dick for doing so. I think that's worse than me accidentally doing it.

Face it Ch3t, you're an aggressive soldier and you always have been. You were pretty unnecessarily harsh about what was a fairly benign summary earlier. It provokes a reaction - I thought that was your game by being so extreme which is fair enough, clever play, but judging by the above I'm not so sure it is intentional any more.

Please tell me where I said it was obvious for all to see?

Ok, you said the below for starters.. I'm sorry if I misinterpreted you but that's how I took what you said and once again you've taken things 10x further than is reasonable. The quotation marks aren't intended to be there as a direct "quote", they're meant as sarcasm. I think you misunderstood that. Maybe I should have used apostrophes instead 'like this'.

I wouldnt even attempt such a summary because a) people should know what is happening via paying attention

I thought you were playing an intelligent game, but with that vote I feel like you're either just as paranoid as anyone else or you've got your own agenda.

If I were a traitor, I like to think I'd have better things to do and more fun ways to behave sabotaging the boat and our hopes for survival than spend 30+ minutes counting votes and trying to draw wiggly lines between people.

When all this is done, if you're really on our side (i.e. good / Germany), I think you need to get your radar checked, soldier, because its way off.
I am only trying to help, you cnut

 

[opticle]

Comrade Rubric, seriously, what the fuck. Your behaviour is not normal.

Someone find the psychologist, the doctor, anyone.

 

[Ch3tan]

What a sneaky bastard you are opti! You took something I said and changed it so it could mean something else. You quoted me, quoted with quote marks as having said "obvious for all to see" when I didn't. I said a summary is not necessary, especially from someone so politically minded. My vote for you certainly stands now, and you think you know someone!

 

[Ch3tan]

"Comrades" vote opti, kill ze spy!

 

[Uara]

Right I've been busy cleaning my bunk. Just had a read through of the goings on onboard, apologies for the slowness of reply.itcheh you seem eager to get a vote on someone and you don't seem to carewho gets it as long as we all vote. A bit bloodthirsty but not towards any one in particular which I suppose alleviate a bit of suspicion off of you.
Opti-chet shouldn't have to summarisee for us, we can all read and draw our own symptoms without it being tainted by others opinions. Nor do I think he is muddying the water, he's stated his ideas on the matter and voted accordingly. I don't like the fact you think he's acting differently from how you think he should behave and I also think you're trying to get others to think that he's trying to confuse.

vote opticle

 

[opticle]

Did you even read what I said ?? I said they were not meant as a direct quotation, I did not need to change a thing because I wasn't changing anything.

I meant it as sarcasm, like this you "intelligent" and "rational" man. People do that all the time. If I'd wanted to use a direct quote I would have used the quote function.

A bad attempt at starting a bandwagon based on nothing other than twisting my words in the most extreme way possible. If you're not a traitor, you're an idiot.

 

[Ch3tan]

No, by not using the direct quote you gave yourself a get out. It's spin, plain and simple, you took what I said and manipulated it it for your own ends, whatever they may be.

 

[opticle]

Pretty quick to jump on the bandwagon there, Uara..

His interpretations don't make sense, they're always far above the appropriate level of reaction, I've said that's a fair game to play because it provokes a reaction ?

Odd.

 

[opticle]

No, by not using the direct quote you gave yourself a get out. It's spin, plain and simple, you took what I said and manipulated it it for your own ends, whatever they may be.

Giving myself a get out; spin, plain and simple; manipulation for my own ends..

Ever try considering both points of view ? Once again, the most extreme possible interpretation with no consideration of the alternatives.

Irrationally paranoid or bad, plain and simple

 

[Ch3tan]

No, you took a simple thing I said, about your summary, which annoyed you as a I reveleaed your little game, and then tried more spin. You backtrack each time someone challenges you, and keep on with the same old blah blah blah.

You are not a friend of this u-boat and it's crew.

 

[opticle]

Revealed your little game; more spin; backtracking..

Again with the alternative point of view. Consider, maybe it's not backtracking, maybe it's just being genuine after all ?

Your blind and misleading attitude is no friend of this U-Boat and its crew. One way or another people will see that eventually.

I used to just think you were just being you, but now I don't trust either you or Uara.

When we complete our mission and make it out of this alive, if you're not a traitor, you're still alive and you're wrong about me and everything else you've said, you suck my balls.. Deal ?

Edit: And you didn't say a simple thing about my summary, you accused me of being flawed and playing games. Who's twisting things now ?

 

[Rubric]

TELL US WHAT YOU DID TO THE SUB OPTICLE. TELL US AND MAYBE WE CAN LET YOU FACE A COURT MARTIAL INSTEAD OF CH3TAN JUSTICE. I SWEAR I WILL HURT YOU UNLESS YOU TELL ME WHAT YOU DONE.

 

[Ch3tan]

Well I've said my peace, tie for others to speak. I am certain that opti is not right, I will not switch from him, but I am happy for the day to end at an impasse. We have gained a lot of knowledge IMO, lots of talk and voting to look at.

For me it's either kill him or do nothing, but the rest of you hold sway on that.

*sits down and lights pipe*

 

[opticle]

TELL US WHAT YOU DID TO THE SUB OPTICLE. TELL US AND MAYBE WE CAN LET YOU FACE A COURT MARTIAL INSTEAD OF CH3TAN JUSTICE. I SWEAR I WILL HURT YOU UNLESS YOU TELL ME WHAT YOU DONE.

Rubric's either cabin-crazy, a traitor who is idiotically persistent to the point of genius, or there's more going on here right now than we're totally aware of.

unvote Rubric.

That doesn't mean that I trust you in the slightest though, comrade.

Right now my money's on either Uara or Ch3tan. More so Uara. I think Ch3tan might just be retarded.

Edit: So you agree, if you're wrong, you're going to suck my balls ? Say nothing if you mean yes.

 

[Calaen]

Well reading back through the people I have issues with are Itcheh (already explained) and Mabs for being a hypocrite, I don't mind that he changed his vote as that could have just been unfortunate timing and I understand his need to stir things up. BUt to then call me on voting without having any evidence. It seems strange to me.

 

[Mabs]

*ahem*
opticle..
<meta gaming is the application of knowledge that you the PERSON has to your CHARACTER. its most common in RPG activities but applies to anything similair. In this instance, saying so-and-so is a twat cos they posted something in another thread, or so-and-so always votes early, or whatever, is meta gaming. basically. if its not in THIS thread, its irrelevant. >

 

[Uara]

Pretty quick to jump on the bandwagon there, Uara..

His interpretations don't make sense, they're always far above the appropriate level of reaction, I've said that's a fair game to play because it provokes a reaction ?

Odd.

anyone who doesn't make first vote will be seen as bandwagonning. Not my fault that chet recently said those things as I was reading the ships logs.

 

[old.Tohtori]

..But then again, "comic" votes are a relatively safe way for a bad guy to trigger things. There's been a few of those.

I don't know about previous vessels you've served upon, but this whole voting for death is a new thing to me. You do however raise a good point, even if my vote is on Mabs already;

Comic vote, especially calling it as such, does bring up stuff and i for one nibbled on it like a frauline on a bratwurst. Now saying outright, after i did bite, that aha, i got you now with my superior fact fiding vote is a bit silly. Surely you'd want more info then just one vote and even more shirley you'd keep the "trap" as a secret.

Or am i completely out in the forest without a jägermeister(huntmaster, dayily learning quota) with this?

 

[old.Tohtori]

Please tell me where I said it was obvious for all to see?

for meta gaming, dragging up the past, being very dodgy in general (gut feeling) and only seeing yourself as trying to help:

I think that's a pretty poor reason to kill someone, opticle seems like a person who's actually trying to figure this out with logic.

(not quoting the vote so the dead captain hass an easier time counting )

 

[itcheh]

<Man-hugs Rubric>Calm down - you're not helping the situation. I know you're scared (we all are) but we are Germans ... we can get out of this - but we MUST find the spies quickly. Take some deep breathes and think about contributing to the solution rather than becoming another problem.

 

[Sydrik]

Im sticking with Mabs, I dont like his 'joke vote' or some of his reasoning.

Ch3t and Opticle's little spat has indeed given all the crew a lot to think about.

 

[Calaen]

I'm happy to head into tonight without anyones blood on my hands if that is the way it unfolds! That being said my vote stands.

 

[opticle]

Im sticking with Mabs, I dont like his 'joke vote' or some of his reasoning.

Ch3t and Opticle's little spat has indeed given all the crew a lot to think about.

Well I'm glad it achieved something And I'm glad someone sees some kinda sense in what I've been saying, Toht, I was beginning to think maybe it was just me or something..

You're right, the voting to kill is an odd concept - I don't know where it sprung from.. somewhere out West maybe ? I hear it's wild over there.. This is my first tour of duty on a U-Boat

Does no one else find Rubric's inability to do anything but respond as he does, just a little bit odd ? Is it really just me ? Why is it bugging no one else ?!

Can whoever the hell is the psychologist or the doctor please fix him ? Sedate him ? Unless he's crazy with remorse and guilt, in which case you have my permission to shoot him.

 

[Ch3tan]

Oh, I have major problems with Rubric's non-committal pyscho approach, I have more with yours right now is all.