opticle
Part of the furniture
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 1,201
You were right about Rubric through pure chance, you should have been wary as hell about him. He accepted both of us as good without a second thought, that is dodgy as hell. He wasn't.. but his behaviour was not that of a innocent.
False statement 1: "[Rubric's] behaviour was not that of a innocent."
Rubric's behaviour WAS that of an innocent. Duh.
False statement 2: "You were right about Rubric through pure chance, you should have been wary as hell about him."
I WAS wary as hell about him - I voted him. Until logic indicated that he was most likely good (that logic derived from wanting you, a bad guy, dead). I was not right about him through pure chance, I was right about him because I am right.