What if Rooney gets injured?
All he can do is hold the ball up and he's not even great at that.Heskey couldn't hit a cows arse with a banjo, which is a bit of a poor thing from a striker, but the rest of his game is class A.
All he can do is hold the ball up and he's not even great at that.
Carlton Cole played half a good season for West Ham. Unfortunately it was the first half of the season, he's been pish since January. Darren Bent is a good premier league forward but without the ball over the top to run onto he looks very ordinary in an England shirt.
England don't play any other way
Without Rooney we'd win nothing anyway, so why include somebody on that basis?
I hear that a lot but personally I dont believe it - I think the key will be midfield.
We have many players who can score goals but at the top level its about posession - if you constantly give it away you will get punished.
The hype around Rooney is getting silly.
We very rarely play with a ball over the top :S We generally play looking for a flick on to Rooney. We tried something new in the last two games using Rooney as the targetman: it failed, it is a waste of his talents and a perfect use of Heskey's. Crouch can do the job if Heskey's form or fitness suffers, his recovery time between games being his biggest weakness imho.
If England are going to get anywhere in the competition they need their big players (Rooney, Gerard and Lampard) to stay fit. Without Rooney we'd win nothing anyway, so why include somebody on that basis?
Agbonlahor would have been a better option for a lone striker, he plays that role very well. Plus he is pretty decent on right wing if all else fails.
I present to you...Inter Milan. There's more to the game than pretty possession football, ask Arsenal.
You think England have an Inter Milan quality defence then? Otherwise they are f00ked![]()
Inter Milan's strengths come from having some very skilled, very determined, positionally aware and highly disciplined DMs.
Something England does not have at all, so attempting to recreate that style of football would be akin to suicide.
Just because one team has success with a certain style doesn't mean we should adopt it. We have to work with what we've got. Like has been said above, we're not going to start playing like Barcelona or Arsenal as we can't pass, keep possession and work attacks well. The same goes for Inter's style, we simply don't have what's required to emulate their European tactics.
Best footballing centre half England have by a country mile though.
Lol @ our defence being good, Ferdinand is a fucking donkey, he's the captain for gods sake and he is not even worthy of being in the squad.
Best footballing centre half England have by a country mile though.
Yeah I guessed the Man Utd supporters would blindly defend him, he is a pile of shit, he used to be good (at Leeds and early Man Utd) but fuck me if you think he is world class you need your head looking at.
All will be revealed in just over a weeks time.
As ST also said how is JT still in the squad?
Trust me, we are going to crash and burn as soon as we play anyone half decent......and I wouldn't bet against the USA beating us either.
I agree Ch3t I would not have taken Upson and went with 5 strikers and took Bent and Heskey. No one can deny what Heskey brings.
But if Rooney gets injured we got no like for like replacement now.
@ Trem nowt to do with supporting United there aint no better english centre halfs around.
Dawson over Upson, Johnson over SWP, Parker/Huddlestone over Carrick, Baines over Warnock, Bent over Defoe. All of these players were on better form, although obviously Capello didn't even bother giving some of them a try at all.Trem stick to DIY, you clearly have far more knowledge of it than football.
Please tell us who Capello should have taken? As far as I can see the only contentious decisions he has really made are over Walcott and Johnson and Hesky/ Bent. The rest of the squad is right, we don't have better players in those positions than those that have gone.
edit:// This post applies to Calean as well, as he has been whining like a woman over Capello.
Sorry Trem, but that's just total bollocks. Rio has had an injury plagued season and the back thing is a worry, but the season before speaks for itself, him and Vidic, with the exception of that bloody Liverpool game, were the best CB paring in the world that season, never mind the Prem. And much as I loathe Terry, he played almost every game for Chelsea last season and only United (bizarrely given their injuries) conceded fewer goals. He's not shit. A total tool, but not a shit footballer.
Trem stick to DIY, you clearly have far more knowledge of it than football.
Please tell us who Capello should have taken? As far as I can see the only contentious decisions he has really made are over Walcott and Johnson and Hesky/ Bent. The rest of the squad is right, we don't have better players in those positions than those that have gone.
Dawson over Upson, Johnson over SWP, Parker/Huddlestone over Carrick, Baines over Warnock, Bent over Defoe. All of these players were on better form, although obviously Capello didn't even bother giving some of them a try at all.
Dawson over Upson, Johnson over SWP, Parker/Huddlestone over Carrick, Baines over Warnock, Bent over Defoe. All of these players were on better form, although obviously Capello didn't even bother giving some of them a try at all.