Cigies
Fledgling Freddie
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2004
- Messages
- 173
Fedaykin said:the point is friars don't gain utility if they spec as a healer, they are not good enough to warrant a position in a top of the range group anymore, the only thing they might be used for is resists
Wardens can fit into a hib group because they will always bring something i.e. 6 Sec PBT, Resists, backup healing, (soon to get det)
My point is that Friars still gain more utility from speccing healing than Wardens do, also Friars can actually do good damage, something a Warden cannot.
Friar healing spec spells:
Major Heal
Cure Poison
Cure Disease
Ressurrection
Group Heal over time
Warden healing spec spells:
Major Heal
Ressurrection
In fact if you look at the spec level 33 Major Heal for both the Warden and the Friar they are exactly the same delve, yet you consider a warden a good healer and a friar a laughable one ?
As for what wardens bring to an RvR group, PBT is totally nullified by /assist, so what they really bring is passive resists and low utility secondary healing, sadly nothing more.
a friar backup healing is useless and may as well be replaced with a cleric who can do the job 10x better.
Most people realise that any primary healer is better to have than a secondary one anyway don't they ? A lot of groups would much rather have another Druid than a Warden in RvR, and I can't blame them really.
Wardens that play as backup healers in RvR typically spec 49 Nurture / 42 Regrowth. How good a healer would a Friar be if he specced to a similar level, say 49 Enhance/43 Rejuvenation ?