- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 36,112
OK @MYstIC G you old bastard. A thread of it's own
@Tom's gonna outlive us all apparently. Well not me, but most of the rest of you.
What amazes me is the number of octogenarians you find at the top of arduous mountain climbs - and I'm glad I've taken the plunge into long-term self-torture and would never turn back. But it seems that when the obvious carrot is dangled a shitload of people simply don't want to push themselves physically.
Socrates is alledged to have said:
But the wize old greek does seem to come second to cadbury's and TV.
Personally, I blame capitalism as the primary base-level contributory factor. As usual. But I'll keep the argument to myself.
These are the NHS minimum recommended activity guidelines - which involve 2.5 hours of moderate aerobic activity every week and 2 hours of weight training (which I currently don't do myself, though I intend to change that very soon). And they're the minimum we should be doing - and most of us don't do that.
So, the question is, for eight years* of additional life a lifelong commitment to hard exercise (not fucking golf) seems to be key. And we're talking quality life, of course, because you're fit and healthy, not weak-muscled and out of breath for it: What could you realistically commit to? Or are the benefits just not worth it to you?
I know @Bodhi and @Raven wouldn't do anything btw, otherwise they wouldn't be giving Tom such a hard time for being a cycling evangelist, which ultimately is a good thing, when they're just lardy motoring 'tards
*yeah yeah, eight years, even if it's an extra 8 days then how about lifelong fitness and ability to walk properly when you're old?...
@Tom's gonna outlive us all apparently. Well not me, but most of the rest of you.
What amazes me is the number of octogenarians you find at the top of arduous mountain climbs - and I'm glad I've taken the plunge into long-term self-torture and would never turn back. But it seems that when the obvious carrot is dangled a shitload of people simply don't want to push themselves physically.
Socrates is alledged to have said:
Socrates said:No citizen has a right to be an amateur in the matter of physical training…what a disgrace it is for a man to grow old without ever seeing the beauty and strength of which his body is capable.
But the wize old greek does seem to come second to cadbury's and TV.
Personally, I blame capitalism as the primary base-level contributory factor. As usual. But I'll keep the argument to myself.
These are the NHS minimum recommended activity guidelines - which involve 2.5 hours of moderate aerobic activity every week and 2 hours of weight training (which I currently don't do myself, though I intend to change that very soon). And they're the minimum we should be doing - and most of us don't do that.
So, the question is, for eight years* of additional life a lifelong commitment to hard exercise (not fucking golf) seems to be key. And we're talking quality life, of course, because you're fit and healthy, not weak-muscled and out of breath for it: What could you realistically commit to? Or are the benefits just not worth it to you?
I know @Bodhi and @Raven wouldn't do anything btw, otherwise they wouldn't be giving Tom such a hard time for being a cycling evangelist, which ultimately is a good thing, when they're just lardy motoring 'tards
*yeah yeah, eight years, even if it's an extra 8 days then how about lifelong fitness and ability to walk properly when you're old?...