Wij
I am a FH squatter
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2003
- Messages
- 18,404
He's totally undermined Putin. Your underling deciding to spare you isn't a good look for a dictator. Some follow up will occur. Hope they both end up with Polonium teas tbh.Seems Prigozhin is going on holiday to Belarus where he'll no doubt encounter a very dangerous cuppa.
Rather odd, unless you consider the people involved I guess:
Wagner boss Prigozhin is in Russia, Belarus ruler Lukashenko says
Alexander Lukashenko says Prigozhin, who led a short-lived mutiny in Russia, is in St Petersburg.www.bbc.co.uk
Jesus. Weak sauce. They plan to use them for what they were designed for, taking out columns of tanks and infantry and by happy coincidence, practically de-mining the area. They aren’t planning to use them in civilian areas like Russia does. Every Russian thing blown up in Ukraine saves Ukrainian lives.US plans to send controversial cluster munitions to Ukraine
The White House defends the move, while acknowledging that such unexploded ordnance can harm civilians.www.bbc.co.uk
War criminals
We can't claim higher ground if we use this shit.
We all hate Russia. But we shouldn't be using banned munitions.Jesus. Weak sauce.
Proper Glem Greenwald bollocks.
Double standards.Early on in the war, the White House was asked about allegations that Russia was using cluster bombs, and then-press secretary Jen Psaki said it would be a "war crime" if true.
Breaking their own laws.the cluster munitions America will send to Ukraine have a dud rate of less than 2.5%...
...US law prohibits the transfer of cluster munitions with bomblet failure rates higher than 1%
So anything is justified?The russian soldiers have invaded the country, it wouldnt matter if they used bombs that deployed the Blob to melt their flesh and eat them, it would still be justified.
We all hate Russia. But we shouldn't be using banned munitions.
Would you justify the use of chemical weapons if Russia used them on civilians and we "only" used them on soldiers?
To their disgrace - but they're still breaking their own laws because of the failure rates of the weapons. As is clearly spelled out. And that's on Biden, specifically.But they aren't, since neither the USA, Russia or Ukraine are signatories of the ban.
I don't understand this sentence? What do I use?It isn't the same type of weapon, but I'm not surprised people such as yourself use it.
Yeah, I don't like the cluster bomb business either. I think UAF can do fine without this type of weapon. They seem to get a lot of materiel support and funding, outclassing the russians in logistics and combined arms tactics. Don't think the cluster bombs are the missing element to freeing up more land quicker.
To their disgrace - but they're still breaking their own laws because of the failure rates of the weapons. As is clearly spelled out. And that's on Biden, specifically.
I don't understand this sentence? What do I use?
Really need to knock out the main central span though:
Two dead after explosions on Kerch Bridge linking Crimea and Russia
Only direct overland link damaged as Russia says it will pull out of UN-brokered grain dealwww.theguardian.com