Politics US Election 2020

[Job]

Are you not frickin interested in looking for yourselves?
You all seem so fucking estatic about him winning but seem to epically fail at considering the Wizard of Oz might be hiding something behind the cutrain, or has Trumpism erased all possibility of him and his team just being the same old fuck it up america

 

[Jupitus]

Are you not frickin interested in looking for yourselves?

Not for the bullshit you claim all the effing time.... I added the warning for your previous post just now. Next time, don't wind us up.

 

[Raven]

Are you not frickin interested in looking for yourselves?

If it's not there, it cannot be found, you utter spaz.

 

[Job]

How about pulling up people for calling me a racist.

Prove it

 

[Aoami]

People around here voted Tory, right?

I did not, but I thought Sunak's father in laws vast wealth was common knowledge and had been probed multiple times before?

 

[Raven]

How about pulling up people for calling me a racist.

Prove it

https://forums.freddyshouse.com/search/3118/

 

[Job]

That doesnt...oh I see.

 

[Job]

I did not, but I thought Sunak's father in laws vast wealth was common knowledge and had been probed multiple times before?

Yes..I would say so..the Mail has covered it many times and that a website with actual viewership.

 

[Raven]

It does have a certain following, yes.

Why not fuck off there?

 

[Gwadien]

How about pulling up people for calling me a racist.

Prove it

It's hard to prove something to someone that rejects factual information

 

[Scouse]

I did not, but I thought Sunak's father in laws vast wealth was common knowledge and had been probed multiple times before?

So, why not on register of interests?

His interest in Infosys alone is a massive conflict of interest.

 

[Gwadien]

So, why not on register of interests?

His interest in Infosys alone is a massive conflict of interest.

Where have you been since the last election?

The tories are hardly making it a secret that there's many conflict of interests.

Cue facepalms

 

[Scouse]

Aye, I thought I'd talk about it, as it's current news.

If I shouldn't bother, I can shut up...

 

[Gwadien]

Aye, I thought I'd talk about it, as it's current news.

If I shouldn't bother, I can shut up...

I knew about Sunak when he was appointed, actually, I'm fairly sure I posted about it at the time.

I don't think people care anymore, so long as it's not Labour.

 

[Raven]

These time they are a changin' as it were.

Even my mum, the must consistent tory voter going (no real political leaning to be fair, just likes the status quo) is starting to get fed up of them.

The way they are going they could seriously faceplant at the next GE, I think Labour have a very good leader for once in Starmer and if they can rid themselves of the truly batshit crazy folk then they are on to a winner.

 

[Scouse]

I think Labour have a very good leader for once in Starmer

Shit white Obama?

Meet the NuLabour Boss, just the same as the Old Boss.

 

[Raven]

I wouldn't go that far, but ultra left (Corbyn and Co) is not something we as a country want atm, nor is it what we need at the moment to be fair. Personally I think far left is as much use as far right, neither get anything done, both get bogged down in the bullshit, one runs out of money, the other gives the money to their Eton mates. Blair was always right wing, cleverly disguised to appease the left.

I'm not running to the hills in adulation for Starmer but I do think he asks the right questions and we aren't ever going to see a sudden, complete change in direction, change takes time.

 

[Jupitus]

How about pulling up people for calling me a racist.

Prove it

Most of the time it's qualified with quotes... of your own posts in fact. They give some backup at least. The issue you have is that you continue on the exact same path of posting unfounded, and unsupported stuff without any evidence or supporting literature. If any other user did it once, twice or maybe 20 times, we'd probably let it go, but you just keep on doing it despite repeated warnings and reminders. Please bear in mind that this is not a commercially supported forum with any overlords to dictate to what policies we enforce. You do NOT have a right to be here and we *could* ban you at any time. I think we have given you plenty of input as to what you are doing wrong, and @Deebs also asked you to join a private conversation with him if you wanted anything from the admins..... did you ever take that up? Certainly not to my knowledge.

 

[Embattle]

A good outcome

Joe Biden gains votes in Wisconsin county after Trump-ordered recount

Milwaukee recount, which cost Trump campaign $3m, boosts Democratic president-elect days before state must certify result

www.theguardian.com

I don't think people care anymore, so long as it's not Labour.

Not really, that sort of comment seems like more JC cover to me.

I think Labour have a very good leader for once in Starmer and if they can rid themselves of the truly batshit crazy folk then they are on to a winner.

I think Starter shows promise however I don't like the game of hide and seek he seems to play at times. It becomes problematic because he leaves the news cycle to the various Tory government failures only to have one hit the Labour party. I also am not convinced by a few members of his cabinet including his shadow chancellor.

 

[Deebs]

 

[caLLous]

 

[Job]

It's hard to prove something to someone that rejects factual information

It's hard to prove something thats just in my head, because job questions propaganda.

Fixed it for you

 

[Job]

View attachment 43176

All part of the new unity I guess.

 

[Deebs]

LOL dumb fucks


View: https://twitter.com/nypost/status/1332577651714875393

 

[Raven]

Well, strictly speaking his dopey supporters have paid 3mil

 

[caLLous]

His dopey supporters probably paid much more than that, he just used the rest to pay off his campaign debts or pocketed it.

 

[Job]

Theyre just trying to save brown people from bombs

 

[Deebs]

Theyre just trying to save brown people from bombs

Look I am getting fucking tired of reading brown people in your posts. Why can't you just say "stop bombs dropping in the Middle East" ?

You are working toward another holiday.....

 

[Raven]

Just get rid of him already, his idiocy is getting extremely boring. I would put him on ignore but that just makes everything hard to read due to the amount of shit he spews and the responses.

 

[Aoami]

Theyre just trying to save brown people from bombs

This is a fucking tiresome trope you thick cunt.

Trump Cancels U.S. Report on Civilian Deaths in Drone Strikes

President Donald Trump revoked a requirement that U.S. intelligence officials publicly report the number of civilians killed in drone strikes and other attacks on terrorist targets outside war zones.

www.bloomberg.com

Trump revokes Obama rule on reporting drone strike deaths

The US will not have to publish how many civilians are killed in drone strikes outside of war zones.

www.bbc.co.uk

Trump tweets apparent confirmation that U.S. drone strike killed top al Qaeda leader

The White House did not comment on whether the president's retweeting was confirmation that the U.S. killed Qassim al-Rimi.

www.nbcnews.com

Trump claims Suleimani was 'saying bad things' about US before deadly strike

President, in audio obtained by CNN from Republican fundraiser at Mar-a-Lago, gives account of drone strike that killed Iranian general

www.theguardian.com

US drone strike ordered by Trump kills top Iranian commander in Baghdad

The commander of Iran's Quds Froce has been killed in a United States strike ordered by President Donald Trump and aimed at "deterring future Iranian attack plans," the Pentagon said in a statement.

edition.cnn.com

Under Donald Trump, drone strikes far exceed Obama's numbers

Trump has escalated the number of U.S. drone strikes overseas, and made the program even more secretive.

chicago.suntimes.com

Trump takes out terrorists, boxes in Biden with drone strikes

President Trump has vastly upped the ante in drone attacks to score decisive wins in the war on terror, a policy that puts pressure on Democratic rival Joseph R. Biden to buck criticism of his role in the Obama administration’s remote-control killings.

www.washingtontimes.com