So one box in total? What? Even if it's one " box" as in voting station collection point thats absurd, local area of city here has ~10k people and we have 3 come election time
If he's challenging them within the legal system then thee's no problem there though is there.Openly saying he wants legally cast votes to be ignored.
If he's challenging them within the legal system then thee's no problem there though is there.
If they win the legal argument then the votes were cast illegally as there's an expectation that they must be received by a certain deadline (which seems reasonable). If not, then they lose.
Nobody said the system was perfect - the buck has to stop somewhere.Which would be fine if the Supreme Court wasn't packed with politically sympathetic Judges appointed by Trump...
And if the GOP have been doing all they can to deliberately hobble the USPS to slow down mailed ballots?If he's challenging them within the legal system then thee's no problem there though is there.
If they win the legal argument then the votes were cast illegally as there's an expectation that they must be received by a certain deadline (which seems reasonable). If not, then they lose.
Separate issue. The judges can only weigh in on points of law.And if the GOP have been doing all they can to deliberately hobble the USPS to slow down mailed ballots?
Nobody said the system was perfect - the buck has to stop somewhere.
Although I agree there are GoP grandees in there - these people aren't fucking idiots. They've spent a lifetime being impartial and applying the law.
With something as fundamental as election law I really can't see them going full retard over Trump. I think they'd probably take offence at the suggestion.